Team response to workload transition: The role of team structure

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 1769-1773

  Jobidon, M E ^a   Breton, R ^a   Rousseau, R ^a,b   Tremblay, S ^b  

^a DEFENCE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CANADA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TEAM RESPONSE; TEAM STRUCTURES; WORKLOAD TRANSITION;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; SENSORY PERCEPTION;

HUMAN ENGINEERING;

EID: 44349083227     PISSN: 10711813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (8)

1. Alberts, D.S., Garstka, JJ., Hayes, R.E., & Signori, D.A. (2001). Understanding information age warfare. Washington, DC: CCRP Publications.
2. Diedrich, F.J., Hocevar, S.P., Entin, E.E., Hutchins, S.G., Kemple, W.G., & Kleinman, D.L. (2002). Adaptative architectures for command and control. Paper presented at the Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium, Monterrey, CA.
3. Entin, E.E., Diedrich, FJ., Kleinman, D.L., Kemple, W.G., Hocevar, S.P., Rubineau, B., & Serfaty, D. (2003). When do organizations need to change (part II)? Incongruence in action. Proceedings of the Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium, Washington, DC.
4. 3Fire microworld. In Y. Waern (Ed.), Co-operative process management (pp. 91-101). London: Taylor & Francis.
5. Hollenbeck, J.R. (2000). A structural approach to external and internal person-team fit. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49(3), 534-549.
6. Huey, B.M., & Wickens, C.D. (Eds.). (1993). Workload transition. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
7. Rousseau, R., Breton, R. (2005, May). Cost/benefit issues in team decision making in relation with team structure. Proceedings of the NATO TG23 Team Effectiveness group Human in Command Workshop, Amersfoort, Netherlands.
8. Salas, E., & Fiore, S.M. (2004). Team cognition. Washington, DC: APA.