Integration of virtual reality and conventional skills trainers: A mixed resource model

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 132, Issue , 2008, Pages 446-450

  Seagull, F Jacob ^a   Moses, Gerald ^a   Park, Adrian E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Simulation; Skill acquisition; Training modality

Indexed keywords

CURRICULA; DIAGNOSIS; PHYSIOLOGY;

INTEGRATED APPROACH; INTEGRATED PROGRAMS; PERFORMANCE FEEDBACK; RESOURCE UTILIZATIONS; SIMULATION; SKILL ACQUISITION; TRAINING EFFICIENCY; TRANSFER OF TRAININGS;

VIRTUAL REALITY;

ARTICLE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EDUCATION; HUMAN; SURGERY; UNITED STATES;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; MARYLAND; SURGERY; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 44249120835     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Seymour N.E., Gallagher A.G., Roman S.A., O'Brien M.K., Bansal V.K, Andersen D.K. and Satava R.M. Virtual Reality Training Improves Operating Room Performance: Result of a Randomized, Double-Blinded Study. Annals of Surgery 2002;236(4):458-64.
2. Datta V, Chang A, Mackay S, Darzi A. The relationship between motion analysis and surgical technical assessments. American Journal of Surgery 2002; 184: 70-73.
3. Montgomery K, Stephanides M, Schendel S, Ross M. User interface paradigms for patient-specific surgical planning: lessons learned over a decade of research. Computerized Medical Imaginging and Graphics. 2005 Mar-Apr;29(2-3):203-22.
4. Scott DJ, Bergen PC, Rege RV et al. Laparoscopic training on bench models: better and more cost effective than operating room experience? Journal of the American College of Surgeons 2000; 191: 272-83.
5. Lathan, C.E., M.R. Tracey, M.M. Sebrechts, D.M. Clawson, G.A. Higgins. "Using Virtual Environments as Training Simulators: Measuring Transfer," in K. Stanney (Ed) Handbook of Virtual Environments: Design, Implementation, and Applications; 2001. New York: Erlbaum.
6. Reznick, RK, MacRae, H., Teaching surgical skills -changes in the wind. New England Journal of Medicine, 2006; 355:2664-2669.
7. Riva, G. Applications of virtual environments in medicine. Methods of Information in Medicine 2003; 42: 524-534.
8. Munz Y, Kumar BD, Moorthy K, Bann S, Darzi A. Laparoscopic virtual reality and box trainers: is one superior to the other? Surgical Endoscopy 2004; 18: 485-94.
9. Kimura, T. Kawabe, A. Suzuki K., Wada H. Usefulness of a virtual reality simulator or training box for endoscopic surgery training. Surgical Endoscopy 2006; 20: 656-659.
10. Merrill, M. D. Instructional Design Theory. 1994; Englewood Cliffs: Educational Technology Publications.
11. Risucci D, Cohen JA, Garbus JE, Goldstein M, Cohen MG. The effects of practice and instruction on speed and accuracy during resident acquisition of simulated laparoscopic skills. Current Surgery, 2001; Mar;58(2):230-235.
12. Champion, HD. (Submitted). Objective assessment of surgical skills. Annals of Surgery. (under review).
13. Youngblood PL, Srivastava S, Curet M, et al. Comparison of training on two laparoscopic simulators and assessment of skills transfer to surgical performance. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2005;200: 546-51.