Quasistatic computer simulation study of the shear behavior of bi- and trilayer water films confined between model hydrophilic surfaces

Langmuir

Volumn 24, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 4750-4755

  Pertsin, Alexander ^a,b   Grunze, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b A N NESMEYANOV INSTITUTE OF ORGANOELEMENT COMPOUNDS   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; HYDROPHILICITY; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MONOLAYERS; PHASE SEPARATION;

MOLECULAR MOBILITY; WALL-TO-WALL SEPARATIONS; WATER FILMS;

LIQUID FILMS;

EID: 44249113378     PISSN: 07437463     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/la7036313     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Yoshizawa, H.; Israelachvili, J. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 113000.
2. Brushan, B.; Israelachvili, J. N. Nature 1995, 374, 607.
3. Gee, M. L.; McGuinnan, P. M.; Israelachvili, J. N.; Homola, A. M. J. Chem. Phys. 1990, 93, 1895.
4. Kumacheva, E.; Klein, J. J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 108, 7010.
5. Raviv, U.; Laurat, P.; Klein, J. Nature 2001, 51, 413.
6. Raviv, U.; Perkin, S.; Laurat, P.; Klein, J. Langmuir 2006, 22, 6142.
7. Granick, S. Phys. Today 1999, 52, 26.
8. Demirel, A. L.; Granick, S. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 2261.
9. Demirel, A. L.; Granick, S. J. Chem. Phys. 2001, 115, 1498.
10. Zhu, Y.; Granick, S. Langmuir 2003, 19, 8148.
11. Sakuma, H.; Otsuki, K.; Kurihara, K. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 96, 046104.
12. Raviv, U.; Klein, J. Science 2002, 297, 1540.
13. Klein, J.; Raviv, U.; Perkin, S.; Kampf, N.; Chai, L.; Giasson, S. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2004, 16, S5437.
14. Dhinojwala, A.; Granick, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 241.
15. Zhu, Y.; Granick, S. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001, 87, 096104.
16. Bordarier, P.; Schoen, M.; Fuchs, A. H. Phys. Rev. E 1998, 57, 1621.
17. Schoen, M.; Cushman, J. H.; Diestler, D. J. Mol. Phys. 1994, 81, 475.
18. Schoen, M.; Diestler, D. J.; Cushman, J. H. J. Chem. Phys. 1994, 100, 7707.
19. Curry, J. E.; Zhang, F.; Cushman, J. H.; Schoen, M.; Diestler, D. J. J. Chem. Phys. 1994, 101, 10824.
20. Curry, J. E.; Cushman, J. H. Mol. Phys. 1995, 85, 173.
21. Schoen, M.; Hess, S.; Diestler, D. J. Phys. Rev. E 1995, 52, 2587.
22. Bock, H.; Schoen, M. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2000, 12, 1545.
23. Schoen, M.; Bock, H. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2000, 12, A333.
24. Bock, H.; Schoen, M. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2000, 12, 1569.
25. Bock, H.; Diestler, D. J.; Schoen, M. Phys. Rev. E 2001, 64, 046124.
26. Pertsin, A.; Grunze, M. Langmuir 2008, 24, 135.
27. McGuiggan, P. M.; Israelachvili, J. N. J. Mater. Res. 1990, 5, 2232.
28. Stapleton, M. R.; Panagiotopoulos, A. J. Chem. Phys. 1990, 92, 1285.
29. Swendsen, R. H.; Wang, J.-S. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1987, 58, 86.
30. Shelley, J. C.; Patey, G. N. J. Chem. Phys. 1995, 102, 7656.
31. zy was defined with the opposite sign in terms of the force exerted by the film on the upper wall.
32. Jorgensen, W. L.; Chandrasekhar, J.; Madura, J. D.; Impey, R. W.; Klein, M. L. J. Chem. Phys. 1983, 79, 926.
33. Curry, J. E. J. Chem. Phys. 2000, 113, 2400. Note that the author interpreted the transition from the shear resisting to shear assisting ranges as an atomic-scale stick-slip transition. Such an interpretation implied that the upper wall would slip during the shear assisting range, if it would be allowed to move.