Technoeconomic assessment and strategic analysis of heat and power co-generation (CHP) from biomass in Greece

Biomass and Bioenergy

Volumn 32, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 558-567

  Bakos, G C ^a   Tsioliaridou, E ^a   Potolias, C ^a  

^a DEMOCRITUS UNIVERSITY OF THRACE   (Greece)

Author keywords

Energy planning model; Power and heat co generation (CHP)

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURE; BIOMASS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

ENERGY PLANNING MODEL; STRATEGIC ANALYSIS;

COGENERATION PLANTS;

AGRICULTURE; BIOMASS; COGENERATION PLANTS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

BIOMASS; CROP RESIDUE; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; ESTIMATION METHOD; HEAT PRODUCTION; MODELING; POWER GENERATION; STRATEGIC APPROACH;

EURASIA; EUROPE; GREECE; SOUTHERN EUROPE;

CHANDIPURA VIRUS;

EID: 44249100686     PISSN: 09619534     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.11.014     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Boyle G. Renewable energy power for a sustainable future (1996), Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
2. Wereko-Broddy C., and Hagen E.B. Biomass conversion and technology (1996), Wiley, England
3. WEC, Survey of energy resources, 2004.
4. Hoogwijk M, den Broek R, Berndes G, Faaij A. A review of assessments on the future of global contribution of biomass energy. First world conference on biomass energy and industry, Sevilla, James & James, London, 2001.
5. Downing M., and Graham R.L. The potential supply and cost of biomass from energy crops in the Tennessee valey authority region. Biomass and Bioenergy 11 4 (1996) 283-303
6. Graham R.I., Liu W., Downing M., Noon C.E., Daly M., and Moore A. The effect of location and facility demand on the marginal cost of delivered wood chips from the energy crops: a case study of the state of Tennessee. Biomass and Bioenergy 13 3 (1997) 117-123
7. Venendaal R., Jorgensen U., and Foster C. European energy crops: a synthesis. Biomass and Bioenergy 13 3 (1997) 147-185
8. Borjesson P.I.I. Energy analysis of biomass production and transportation. Biomass and Bioenergy 11 4 (1996) 305-318
9. Jerkins B.M. A comment on the optimal sizing of a biomass utilization facility under constant and variable cost scaling. Biomass and Bioenergy 13 1-2 (1997) 1-9
10. Fiala M., Pellizzi G., and Riva G. A model for the optimal dimensioning of biomass-fuelled electric power plants. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 67 (1997) 17-25
11. Invert Simulation Tool. International workshop, 4 March, Athens, 2005.
12. INVERT project, Altener Program of the European Commission, website 〈www.invert.at〉.
13. Resch G, Faber T, Haas R, Huber C. Experience curves vs dynamic cost-resource curves and their impact on the assessment of the future development of renewables. ENER Forum 5, Market reform and climate policies, Bucharest, Romania, 16-17 October 2003.
14. Stadler M, Kranzl L, Huber C. The INVERT simulation tool, user manual. Altener Program of the European Commission, DG TREN, January 2005.
15. Voivontas D., Assimacopoulos D., and Koukios E.G. Assessment of biomass potential for power production: a GIS based method. Biomass and Bioenergy 20 (2001) 101-112
16. Vamvuka D., and Tsoutsos T.D. Energy exploitation of agricultural residues in Crete. Energy Exploration and Exploitation 20 1 (2002) 113-121