Combining multiple Bayesian data analyses in a sequential framework for quantitative fisheries stock assessment

Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences

Volumn 65, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 962-974

  Michielsens, Catherine G J ^a,e   McAllister, Murdoch K ^b   Kuikka, Sakari ^c   Mäntyniemi, Samu ^c   Romakkaniemi, Atso ^a   Pakarinen, Tapani ^a   Karlsson, Lars ^d   Uusitalo, Laura ^c  

^a FINNISH FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^d INSTITUTE OF FRESHWATER RESEARCH   (Sweden)

^e Pacific Salmon Commission   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; DATA INTERPRETATION; ESTIMATION METHOD; MODELING; SALMONID; SMOLT; STOCK ASSESSMENT;

ATLANTIC OCEAN; BALTIC SEA;

SALMO SALAR;

EID: 44149116953     PISSN: 0706652X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/F08-015     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Bengtsson, B., Hill, C., Bergman, A., Brandt, I., Johansson, N., Magnhagen, C., Sodergren, A., and Thulin, J. 1999. Reproductive disturbances in Baltic fish: a synopsis of the FiRe Project. Ambio, 28: 2-8.
2. Best, N., Cowles, M.K., and Vines, K. 1995. CODA manual, version 0.30. MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge.
3. Börjeson, H., and Norrgren, L. 1997. M74 syndrome: a review of potential etiological factors. In Chemically induced alterations in functional development and reproduction of fishes. Proceedings from a session at the 1995 Wingspread Conference. Edited by R.M. Rolland, M. Gilbertson, and R.E. Peterson. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC), Pensacola, Florida. pp. 153-166.
4. Chen, Y., Chen, L., and Stergiou, K.I. 2003. Impacts of data quantity on fisheries stock assessment. Aquat. Sci. 65: 92-98.
5. Elliott, J.M. 1993. A 25-year study of production of juvenile sea trout, Salmo trutta, in an English Lake District stream. Can. Spec. Publ. Fish. Aquat. Sci. No. 118. pp. 109-122.
6. Geiger, H.J., and Koenings, J.P. 1991. Escapement goals for sockeye salmon with informative prior probabilities based on habitat considerations. Fish. Res. 11: 239-256.
7. Gelman, A., Carlin, J.B., Stern, H.S., and Rubin, R.B. 1995. Bayesian data analysis. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.
8. Hampton, J., and Fournier, D.A. 2001. A spatially disaggregated length-based, age-structured population model of yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) in the western and central Pacific Ocean. Mar. Freshw. Res. 52: 937-963.
9. Hilborn, R., and Liermann, M. 1998. Standing on the shoulders of giants: learning form experience in fisheries. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 8: 273-283.
10. International Council for the Exploration of the Sea. 2006. Report of the Baltic salmon and trout assessment working group. International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES), Copenhagen, Denmark.
11. Karlsson, L., and Karlström, Ö. 1994. The Baltic salmon (Salmo salar L.): its history, present situation and future. Dana, 10: 61-85.
12. Koljonen, M-L. 2006. Annual changes in the proportions of wild and hatchery Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) caught in the Baltic Sea. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 63: 1274-1285.
13. Koljonen, M-L., Pella, J.J., and Masuda, M. 2005. Classical individual assignments versus mixture modeling to estimate stock proportions in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) catches from DNA microsatellite data. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 62: 2143-2158.
14. Kullback, S., and Leibler, R.A. 1951. On information and sufficiency. Ann. Math. Stat. 22: 79-86.
15. Mace, P.M., and Doonan, I.J. 1988. A generalized bioeconomic simulation model for fish population dynamics. N.Z. Fisheries Association Research Document No. 88/4.
16. Madsen, A.L., Jensen, F., Kjærulff, U.B., and Lang, M. 2005. HUGIN - the tool for Bayesian networks and influence diagrams. Int. J. Art. Intel. Tools, 14: 507-543.
17. Mäntyniemi, S., and Romakkaniemi, A. 2002. Bayesian mark-recapture estimation with an application to a salmonid smolt population. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 59: 1748-1758.
18. Maury, O., and Restrepo, V. 2002. FASST: a fully age-size and space-time structured statistical model for the assessment of tuna populations. Col. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT, 54: 1682-1692.
19. McAllister, M.K., and Ianelli, J.N. 1997. Bayesian stock assessment using catch-age data and the sampling-importance resampling algorithm. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 54: 284-300.
20. McAllister, M.K., and Kirchner, C.H. 2002. Accounting for structural uncertainty to facilitate precautionary fishery management: illustration with Namibian orange roughy. Bull. Mar. Sci. 70: 499-540.
21. McAllister, M.K., Pikitch, E.K., Punt, A.E., and Hilborn, R. 1994. A Bayesian approach to stock assessment and harvest decisions using the sampling/importance resampling algorithm. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 51: 2673-2687.
22. McAllister, M.K., Pikitch, E.K., and Babcock, E.A. 2001. Using demographic methods to construct Bayesian priors for the intrinsic rate of increase in the Schaefer model and implications for stock rebuilding. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 58: 1871-1890.
23. McAllister, M.K., Hill, S., Agnew, D., Kirkwood, G., and Beddington, J. 2004. A Bayesian hierarchical formulation of the De Lury stock assessment model for abundance estimation of Falklands squid. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 61: 1048-1059.
24. Michielsens, C.G.J., and McAllister, M.K. 2004. A Bayesian hierarchical analysis of stock-recruit data: quantifying structural and parameter uncertainties. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 61: 1032-1047.
25. Michielsens, C.G.J., McAllister, M.K., Kuikka, S.M., Pakarinen, T., Karlsson, L., Romakkaniemi, A., Perä, I., and Mäntyniemi, S. 2006a. Bayesian state-space mark-recapture model to estimate fishing mortality rates within a mixed-stock fishery. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 63: 321-334.
26. Michielsens, C.G.J., Mäntyniemi, S., and Vuorinen, P.J. 2006b. Estimation of annual mortality rates caused by early mortality syndromes (EMS) and their impact on salmonid stock-recruit relationships. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 63: 1968-1981.
27. Minte-Vera, C.V., Branch, T.A., Stewart, I.J., and Dorn, M.W. 2004. Practical application of meta-analysis results: avoiding the double use of data. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 62: 925-929.
28. Myers, R.A., and Mertz, G. 1998. Reducing uncertainty in the biological basis of fisheries management by meta-analysis of data from many populations: a synthesis. Fish. Res. 37: 51-60.
29. Myers, R.A., Barrowman, N.J., Hilborn, R., and Kehler, D.G. 2002. Inferring Bayesian priors with limited direct data: application to risk analysis. N. Am. J. Fish. Manag. 22: 351-364.
30. Niemelä, J. 1999. Fecundity of Baltic salmon (Salmo salar L.) in the river Tornionjoki. Finnish Game and Fisheries Research Institute, Helsinki, Finland.
31. Ó Maoiléidigh, N., McGinnity, P., Prévost, E., Potter, E.C.E., Gargan, P., Crozier, W.W., Mills, P., and Roche, W. 2004. Application of pre-fishery abundance modelling and Bayesian hierarchical stock and recruitment analysis to the provision of precautionary catch advice for the Irish salmon (Salmo salar L.) fisheries. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 61: 1370-1378.
32. Parma, A.M. 2002. Bayesian approaches to the analysis of uncertainty in the stock assessment of Pacific halibut. In Incorporating uncertainty into fisheries models. Edited by J.M. Berkson, L.L. Kline, and D.J. Orth. Am. Fish. Soc. Symp. 27: 113-133.
33. Potter, E.C.E., MacLean, J.C., Wyatt, R.J., and Campbell, R.N.B. 2003. Managing the exploitation of migratory salmonids. Fish. Res. 62: 127-142.
34. Punt, A.E., and Hilborn, R. 1997. Fisheries stock assessment and decision analysis: the Bayesian approach. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 7: 35-63.
35. Punt, A.E., Pribac, F., Walker, T.I., Taylor, B.L., and Prince, J.D. 2000. Stock assessment of school shark Galeorhinus galeus based on a spatially-explicit population dynamics model. Mar. Freshw. Res. 51: 205-220.
36. Raftery, A.E., Givens, G.H., and Zeh, J.E. 1995. Inference from a deterministic population dynamics model for bowhead whales. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 90: 402-416.
37. Romakkaniemi, A., Perä, I., Karlsson, L., Jutila, E., Carlsson, U., and Pakarinen, T. 2003. Development of wild Atlantic salmon stocks in the rivers of the northern Baltic Sea in response to management actions. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 60: 329-342.
38. Salminen, M., Kuikka, S., and Erkamo, E. 1995. Annual variability in survival of sea-ranched Baltic salmon, Salmo salar L.: significance of smolt size and marine conditions. Fish. Manag. Ecol. 2: 171-184.
39. Schnute, J.T., and Hilborn, R. 1993. Analysis of contradictory data sources in fish stock assessment. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 50: 1916-1923.
40. Spiegelhalter, D.J., Dawid, A.P., Laurizen, S.L., and Cowell, R.G. 1993. Bayesian analysis in expert systems. Stat. Sci. 8: 219-247.
41. Thomas, A., Spiegelhalter, D.J., and Gilks, W.R. 1992. BUGS: a program to perform Bayesian inference using Gibbs sampling. In Bayesian Statistics 4. Edited by J.M. Bernardo, J.O. Berger, A.P. Dawid, and A.F.M. Smith. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK. pp. 837-842.
42. United Nations. 2002. Report of the World Summit on Sustainable Development, Johannesburg, South Africa, 26 August - 4 September 2002. United Nations, New York.
43. Uusitalo, L., Kuikka, S., and Romakkaniemi, A. 2005. Estimation of Atlantic salmon smolt carrying capacity of rivers using expert knowledge. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 62: 708-722.
44. van der Gaag, L. 1996. Bayesian belief networks: odds and ends. Comput. J. 39: 97-113.