Predicting major adverse cardiac events after percutaneous coronary intervention: The Texas Heart Institute risk score

American Heart Journal

Volumn 155, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 1068-1074

  Madan, Pankaj ^a   Elayda, MacArthur A ^a   Lee, Vei Vei ^a   Wilson, James M ^a  

^a ST LUKE S EPISCOPAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACUTE HEART INFARCTION; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; DATA BASE; DEATH; DRUG ELUTING STENT; FEMALE; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; INDEPENDENT VARIABLE; KIDNEY FAILURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE; PREDICTION; PREDICTOR VARIABLE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REOPERATION; REVASCULARIZATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK REDUCTION; STENT; STROKE; THROMBUS; UNSTABLE ANGINA PECTORIS; VALIDATION STUDY; VASCULAR LESION;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANGIOPLASTY, TRANSLUMINAL, PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; FEMALE; FORECASTING; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; TEXAS;

EID: 44149107804     PISSN: 00028703     EISSN: 10976744     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.01.034     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Hannan E., Racz M., Ryan T., et al. Coronary angioplasty volume-outcome relationships for hospitals and cardiologists. JAMA 277 (1997) 892-898
2. Ellis S., Weintraub W., Holmes D., et al. Relation of operator volume and experience to procedural outcome of percutaneous coronary revascularization at hospitals with high interventional volumes. Circulation 95 (1997) 2479-2484
3. O'Connor G., Malenka D., Quinton H., et al. Multivariate prediction of in-hospital mortality after percutaneous coronary interventions in 1994-1996. Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group. J Am Coll Cardiol 34 (1999) 681-691
4. Moscucci M., Kline-Rogers E., Share D., et al. Simple bedside additive tool for prediction of in-hospital mortality after percutaneous coronary interventions. Circulation 104 (2001) 263-268
5. Resnic F., Ohno-Machado L., Selwyn A., et al. Simplified risk score models accurately predict the risk of major in-hospital complications following percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 88 (2001) 5-9
6. Shaw R., Anderson H., Brindis R., et al. Development of a risk adjustment mortality model using the American College of Cardiology-National Cardiovascular Data Registry (ACC-NCDR) experience: 1998-2000. J Am Coll Cardiol 39 (2002) 1104-1112
7. Qureshi M., Safian R., Grines C., et al. Simplified scoring system for predicting mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol 42 (2003) 1890-1895
8. Singh M., Lennon R., Holmes D.J., et al. Correlates of procedural complications and a simple integer risk score for percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol 40 (2002) 387-393
9. van Houwelingen J., and le Cessie S. Predictive value of statistical models. Stat Med 9 (1990) 1303-1325
10. Singh M., Rihal C., Lennon R., et al. Prediction of complications following nonemergency percutaneous coronary interventions. Am J Cardiol 96 (2005) 907-912
11. Rathore S., Rhys J., Buchalter M., et al. Impact of age on the outcomes of women following percutaneous coronary intervention in the bare-metal stent era. J Interv Cardiol 19 (2006) 245-249
12. Singh M., Rihal C., Lennon R., et al. A critical appraisal of current models of risk stratification for percutaneous coronary interventions. Am Heart J 149 (2005) 753-760
13. Singh M., Rihal C., Selzer F., et al. Validation of Mayo Clinic risk adjustment model for in-hospital complications after percutaneous coronary interventions, using the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute dynamic registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 42 (2003) 1722-1728
14. Matheny M., Ohno-Machado L., and Resnic F. Discrimination and calibration of mortality risk prediction models in interventional cardiology. J Biomed Inform 38 (2005) 367-375