The future of ESWL;Die zukunft der ESWL

Urologe - Ausgabe A

Volumn 47, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 569-577

  Kohrmann K U ^a   Neisius, D ^b   Rassweiler, J ^c  

^a St Hedwig Klinik GmbH   (Germany)

^b KRANKENHAUS DER BARMHERZIGEN BRÜDER   (Germany)

^c SLK Kliniken Heilbronn GmbH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Endourology; ESWL; Lithotripsy; Shock wave; Urinary stones

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; ENDOSCOPY; EXTRACORPOREAL LITHOTRIPSY; NON INVASIVE PROCEDURE; UROLITHIASIS;

COMBINED MODALITY THERAPY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FORECASTING; HUMANS; KIDNEY CALCULI; LITHOTRIPSY; NEPHROSTOMY, PERCUTANEOUS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URETERAL CALCULI; URETEROSCOPY;

EID: 44149083032     PISSN: 03402592     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00120-008-1731-4     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bailey MR, Pishchalnikov YA, Sapozhnikov OA et al. (2005) Cavitation detection during shock-wave lithotripsy. Ultrasound Med Biol 31: 1245-1256
2. Basillote JB, Lee DI, Eichel L, Clayman RV (2004) Ureteroscopes: flexible, rigid, and semirigid. Urol Clin North Am 31: 21-32
3. Cartledge JJ, Cross WR, Lloyd SN, Joyce AD (2001) The efficacy of a range of contact media as coupling agents in extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. BJU Int 88: 321-324
4. Chandhoke PS (2002) When is medical prophylaxis cost-effective for recurrent calcium stones? J Urol 168: 937-940
5. Chang CC, Manousakas I, Pu YR et al. (2002) In vitro study of ultrasound based real-time tracking for renal stones in shock wave lithotripsy: part II - a simulated animal experiment. J Urol 167: 2594-2597
6. Chaussy C, Schmiedt E (1984) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for kidney stones. An alternative to surgery? Urol Radiol 6: 80-87
7. Chow GK, Streem SB (2000) Extracorporeal lithotripsy. Update on technology. Urol Clin North Am 27: 315-322
8. Clayman RV (1998) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for lower calyceal stones: can clearance be predicted? J Urol 160: 629
9. Cleveland RO, Lifshitz DA, Connors BA et al. (1998) In vivo pressure measurements of lithotripsy shock waves in pigs. Ultrasound Med Biol 24: 293-306
10. Evan AP, Willis LR, McAteer JA et al. (2002) Kidney damage and renal functional changes are minimized by waveform control that suppresses cavitation in shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 168: 1556-1562
11. Graber SF, Danuser H, Hochreiter WW, Studer UE (2003) A prospective randomized trial comparing 2 lithotriptors for stone disintegration and induced renal trauma. J Urol 169: 54-57
12. Hamid A, Dwivedi US, Singh TN et al. (2003) Artificial neural networks in predicting optimum renal stone fragmentation by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a preliminary study. BJU Int 91: 821-824
13. Hesse A, Brandle E, Wilbert D et al. (2003) Study on the prevalence and incidence of urolithiasis in Germany comparing the years 1979 vs. 2000. Eur Urol 44: 709-713
14. Joseph P, Mandal AK, Singh SK et al. (2002) Computerized tomography attenuation value of renal calculus: can it predict successful fragmentation of the calculus by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy? A preliminary study. J Urol 167: 1968-1971
15. Krambeck AE, Gettman MT, Rohlinger AL et al. (2006) Diabetes mellitus and hypertension associated with shock wave lithotripsy of renal and proximal ureteral stones at 19 years of followup. J Urol 175: 1742-1747
16. Lee YH, Tsai JY, Jiaan BP et al. (2006) Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy for management of large upper third ureteral stones. Urology 67: 480-484
17. Leistner R, Wendt-Nordahl G, Grobholz R et al. (2007) A new electromagnetic shock-wave generator.,SLX-F2" with user-selectable dual focus size: ex vivo evaluation of renal injury. Urol Res 35: 165-171
18. Loske AM, Fernandez F, Zendejas H et al. (2005) Dual pulse shock wave lithotripsy: in vitro and in vivo study. J Urol 174: 2388-2392
19. Lotan Y, Cadeddu JA, Pearle MS (2005) International comparison of cost effectiveness of medical management strategies for nephrolithiasis. Urol Res 33: 223-230
20. McAteer JA, Williams JC Jr, Cleveland RO et al. (2005) Ultracal-30 gypsum artificial stones for research on the mechanisms of stone breakage in shock wave lithotripsy. Urol Res 33: 429-434
21. Pace KT, Ghiculete D, Harju M, Honey RJ (2005) Shock wave lithotripsy at 60 or 120 shocks per minute: a randomized, double-blind trial. J Urol 174: 595-599
22. Rassweiler J, Schmidt A, Gumpinger R et al. (1990) ESWL for ureteral calculi. Using the Dornier HM 3, HM 3+ and Wolf Piezolith 2,200. J Urol (Paris) 96: 149-153
23. Rassweiler JJ, Renner C, Chaussy C, Thuroff S (2001) Treatment of renal stones by extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: an update. Eur Urol 39: 187-199
24. Rubin JI, Arger PH, Pollack HM et al. (1987) Kidney changes after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: CT evaluation. Radiology 162: 21-24
25. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA et al. (1996) Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ 312: 71-72
26. Sheir KZ, El Diasty TA, Ismail AM (2005) Evaluation of a synchronous twin-pulse technique for shock wave lithotripsy: the first prospective clinical study. BJU Int 95: 389-393
27. Talic RF, Rabah DM (2006) Effect of modification of shock-wave delivery on stone fragmentation. Curr Opin Urol 16: 83-87
28. Tiselius HG (2005) Removal of ureteral stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic procedures. What can we learn from the literature in terms of results and treatment efforts? Urol Res 33: 185-190
29. Zhou Y, Cocks FH, Preminger GM, Zhong P (2004) Innovations in shock wave lithotripsy technology: updates in experimental studies. J Urol 172: 1892-1898
30. Zhou Y, Cocks FH, Preminger GM, Zhong P (2004) The effect of treatment strategy on stone comminution efficiency in shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 172: 349-354
31. Zhu S, Dreyer T, Liebler M et al. (2004) Reduction of tissue injury in shock-wave lithotripsy by using an acoustic diode. Ultrasound Med Biol 30: 675-682