International agricultural research as a global public good: Concepts, the CGIAR experience, and policy issues

Journal of International Development

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 347-379

  Dalrymple, Dana G ^a  

^a Bureau for Economic Development   (United States)

Author keywords

Agricultural R D; CGIAR; Foreign aid; Global international public goods; International agricultural research; Public goods

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH; DEVELOPING WORLD; FOOD PRODUCTION; POLICY DEVELOPMENT; PUBLIC GOODS; PUBLIC SECTOR; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; SPILLOVER EFFECT;

EID: 44049092184     PISSN: 09541748     EISSN: 10991328     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jid.1420     Document Type: Article

References (160)

1. Alston J. 2002. Spillovers. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 46(3): 336, 337.
2. Alston JM, Pardey PG. 1996. Making Science Pay: The Economics of Agricultural R&D Policy. The AEI Press: Washington; 265-273, 297-303, 338-340.
3. Anderson J. 1997. Development and the Agricultural Knowledge System: National and International Imperatives. Synder Memorial Lecture, Purdue University, 4.
4. Anderson J. 1998. Selected policy issues in international agricultural research: on striving for international public goods in an era of donor fatigue. World Development 26: 1149.
5. Anderson J, Dalrymple D. 1999. The World Bank, The Grant Program, and the CGIAR; a retrospective review. The World Bank (Washington), Operations Evaluation Department, OED Working Paper Series No. 1, 1-1-97.
6. Angelsen A, Kaimowitz D. 1999. Reducing the costs of deforestation: lessons from economic models. The World Bank Research Observer 14: 82, 84-85, 87, 91.
7. Angelsen A, Kaimowitz D (eds). 2001. Agricultural Technologies and Tropical Deforestation. CABI Publishing: Wallingford; 1-422.
8. Anonymous. 2001. Saint Bill: how to give away riches beyond the dreams of avarice. The Economist, June 16, 15.
9. Anonymous. 2006. Meeting global challenges: international cooperation in the national interest, Report of the International Task Force on Global Public Goods, Stockholm [http://www.gpgtaskforce.org/bazment.aspx]
10. Aristotle. 1943. Aristotle's Politics, Trans. by Benjamin Jowett (Bk VII, Ch. 9, 1328). The Modern Library: New York; 294.
11. Arrow KJ. 1962. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors. Universities-National Bureau Committee for Economic Research, Conference Series 13. Princeton University Press: Princeton; 609-625.
12. Bacon F. 2000. The New Organon, Jardine L, Silverthorne M (eds). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge; Introduction, xiv, and book I, aphorism 129 (CXXIX), 99-100.
13. Barrett S. 2007. Why Cooperate? The Incentive to Supply Global Public Goods. Oxford University Press: New York.
14. Barnes A. 2001. Towards a framework for justifying public agricultural R&D: the example of U.K. Agricultural Research Policy. Research Policy 30: 667, 668, 670.
15. Barton J, Berger P. 2001. Patenting agriculture. Issues in Science and Technology 17: 47.
16. Baum W. 1986. Partners Against Hunger: The Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research. World Bank: Washington; 27-53. (Published for the CGIAR.)
17. Bell D, Clark C, Ruttan V. 1991. Global research systems for sustainable development: agriculture, health, and environment. In Agriculture, Environment, and Health, Ruttan V (ed.). University of Minnesota Press: Minneapolis; 360-370.
18. Burnside C, Dollar D. 2000. Aid, policies, and growth. The American Economic Review 80: 864.
19. Byerlee D. 2000. Targeting poverty alleviation in priority setting for agricultural research. Food Policy 25: 429-445.
20. Byerlee D, Traxler G. 2001. The role of technology spillovers and economics of size in the efficient design of agricultural research systems. In Agricultural Science Policy: Changing Global Agendas, Pardey P, Taylor M (eds). Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore; 161-186.
21. Byerlee D, Echeverria R (eds). 2002. Agricultural Research Policy in an Era of Privatization. CABI Publishing: Wallingford and New York.
22. Callon M. 1994. Is science a public good? Science, Technology and Human Values 19: 416.
23. Cernea M, Kassam A. (eds). 2006. Researching the Culture in Agri-Culture: Social Research for International Development. CABI Publishing: Wallingford.
24. Chapman A. 2005. England's Leonardo: Robert Hooke and the Seventeenth-Century Scientific Revolution. Institute of Physics Publishing: Bristol and Philadephia; 34; drawn from book I, aphorism 99 (XCIX) in an 1860 edition of The New Organon.
25. Chavas J, Alber M, Cox T. 1997. An analysis of the source and nature of technical change: the case of U.S. agriculture. The Review of Economics and Statistics 79: 482-493.
26. Coe D, Helpman E. 1995. International R&D spillovers. European Economic Review 39: 859-887.
27. Cohen J. 1999. Philanthropy's rising tide lifts science. Science 286: 214-233.
28. Cohen J. 2002. Gates foundation rearranges public health universe. Science 295: 2000.
29. Cohen W, Levinthal D. 1989. Invention and learning: the two faces of R&D. The Economic Journal 99: 569.
30. Commission. 1990. Health Research: Essential Link to Equity in Development. Commission on Health Research for Development. Oxford University Press: Oxford; 59.
31. Commission. 2002. Integrating intellectual property rights and development policy; Report of the Commission on Intellectual Property Rights. Commission on Intellectual Property Rights: London; [www.iprcommission.org]
32. Cook L, Sachs J. 1999. Public regional goods in international assistance. In Kaul I, Grunberg I, Stern M (eds). 436-439.
33. Cooper R. 1985. International economic cooperation: is it desirable? Is it likely? Bulletin, American Academy of Arts and Sciences 39: 31.
34. Cornes R, Sandler T. 1996. The Theory of Externalities, Public Goods, and Club Goods. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge; 4.
35. CGIAR. 1994-2000. 2002 (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research), CGIAR Financial Reports, Annual. CGIAR Secretariat, World Bank, Washington.
36. CGIAR. 2000. Summary of Proceedings and Decisions, CGIAR International Centers Week, Washington, D.C., October 23-27. CGIAR Secretariat, World Bank, Washington, 41.
37. CGIAR. 2001. Designing and managing change in the CGIAR: Report to the Mid-Term Meeting 2001, Change Design and Management Team, April, 6-7, 9(quote)-11.
38. CGIAR. 2005. Investment proposals and financing of the 2006 CGLAR research agenda, CGLAR Secretariat, Washington, October, 8-9.
39. CGIAR. 2006. 'Financial Report 2005', 2005 CGIAR Annual Report, CGIAR Secretariat, World Bank, Washington, D.C., 50-60 and enclosed CD, 16-17, 42.
40. Cummings R, Dalrymple D. 1989. Development assistance and exports: the case of the United States. Agricultural Economics 3: 293-307.
41. Dalrymple D. 1980. Development and spread of semi-dwarf varieties of wheat and rice in the United States: an international perspective. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Economic Report 455, June.
42. Dalrymple D. 2002. International Agricultural Research as a Global Public Good: A Review of Literature, Issues, and the CGIAR Experience. In Proceedings of the Warren E. Kronstad Symposium, Reeves J, McNab A, Rajaram S (eds). CIMMYT: Mexico, D.F.; 59-72.
43. Dalrymple D. 2003. Scientific knowledge as a global public good: contributions to innovation and society. In The Role of Scientific and Technical Data and Information in the Public Domain, Esanu J, Uhlir P (eds). National Academies Press: Washington, D.C.; 35-51 fwww.nap.edu/catalog/10785].
44. Dalrymple D. 2005. Scientific knowledge as a public good. The Scientist 19(12), June 20, 10 (Opinion).
45. Dalrymple D. 2006a. Social science knowledge as a public good. In Researching the Culture in Agri-Culture: Social Research for International Development, Cernea M, Kassam A (eds). CABI Publishing: Wallingford; 431-446.
46. Dalrymple D. 2006b. Impure public goods and agricultural research: toward a blend of theory and practice. Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture 45(1): 71-89.
47. Dalrymple D. 2006c. Setting the agenda for science and technology in the public sector: the case of international agricultural research. Science and Public Policy 33(4): 277-290.
48. Dalrymple D. 2006d. Artemisia, agriculture and malaria in Africa: the interplay of tradition, science and public policy. U.S. Agency for International Development, Office of Environment and Science Policy, July. Posted as a working paper at [http://rollbackmalaria.org/docs/mmss/ Artemisia AgricultureMalariapdf]
49. Dalrymple D. 2007. International Health Policy Research for developing nations: needs, opportunities, and relevant experience; an annotated outline and bibliography, U.S. Agency for International Development, Office of Environment and Science Policy, July (unpublished working paper), 7.
50. Dalrymple D, Srivastava J. 1994. Transfer of plant cultivars: seeds, sectors, and society. In Anderson (1994) 194-195.
51. David P. 2002. The political economy of public science. In The Public Regulation of Science and Technology, Smith H (ed.). Palgrave: New York; 36, 54.
52. de Gorter H, Zilberman D. 1990. On the political economy of public goods inputs in agriculture. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72: 136.
53. de Janvry A, Kassan A. 2001. Regional Approach to Research for the CGIAR and its Partners. TAC Secretariat, FAO: Rome, 16.
54. Dreze J, Sen A. 1989. Hunger and Public Action. Clarendon Press: Oxford; 252.
55. Evenson R, Gollin D (eds). 2003a. Crop Variety Improvement and its Effect on Productivity. CABI Publishing: Wallingford and Cambridge.
56. Evenson R, Gollin D. 2003b. Assessing the impact of the green revolution. Science 300: 758-762.
57. Falcon W. 2002. Globalizing germplasm: barriers, benefits, and boundaries. In Tomorrow's Agriculture: Incentives, Institutions, Infrastructure and Innovations. Proceedings, Twenty-Fourth International Conference of Agricultural Economists, Peters G, Pingali P (eds). Ashgate: Aldershot; 41-60.
58. Ferroni M. 2001. Regional public goods in official development assistance. Inter-American Development Bank (Washington), Integration and Regional Programs Department, INTAL-ITD-STA Occasional Paper 11, Washington, 1-27.
59. Fisher F, Temin P. 1973. Returns to scale in research and development: what does the Schumpeterian Hypothesis imply? Journal of Political Economy 81: 56-70.
60. Fuglie K, Zhang L, Salazar L, Walker T. 1999. Economic Impact of Virus-Free Sweet Potato Planting Material in Shandgong Province, China. International Potato Center: Lima, Peru; 1-27.
61. Fuglie K, Schimmelpfenning D (eds). 2000. Public-Private Collaboration in Agricultural Research. Iowa State University Press: Ames; 219-299.
62. Gardner B, Lesser W. 2003. International agricultural research as a global public good. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85(3): 696.
63. Gerrard C, Ferroni M, Mody A. 2001. Global Public Policies and Programs: Implications for Financing and Evaluation. The World Bank: Washington, Operations Evaluation Department, 1-244.
64. Geroski P. 1995. Markets for technology: knowledge, innovation and appropriability. In Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technical Change, Stoneman P (ed.). Blackwell: Oxford; 93.
65. Gerpacio R (ed.). 2001. Impact of Public- and Private-Sector Maize Breeding Research in Asia, 1966-1997/98. CIMMYT: Mexico, D.F; 40-43.
66. Gisselquist D, Grether J. 2000. An argument for deregulating the transfer of agricultural technologies to developing countries. The World Bank Economic Review 14: 111-127.
67. Greenland DJ. 1997. International agricultural research and the CGIAR system - past, present, and future. Journal of International Development 9(4): 459-482.
68. Gryseels G, Anderson J. 1991. International agricultural research. In Agricultural Research Policy: International Quantitative Perspectives, Pardey P, Roseboom J, Anderson J (eds). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge; 329-335.
69. Hardin G. 1968. The tragedy of the commons. Science 162: 1243-1248.
70. Hardin R. 1982. Collective Action. Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore; 1-2. (Published for Resources for the Future.)
71. Harwood R, Place F, Kassam A, Gregerson H. 2006. International public goods through integrated natural resources management research in CGIAR partnerships. Experimental Agriculture 42(1): 375-397.
72. Hassan R, Mekuria H, Mwani W. 2001. Maize Breeding Research in Eastern and Southern Africa: Current Status and Impacts of Past Investments Made by the Public and Private Sectors 1997-97. CIMMYT: Mexico, D.F.; 40-43.
73. Heisey P, Srinivasan C, Thirtle C. 2001. Public sector plant breeding in a privatizing world, U.S. Department of Agriculture (Washington), Economic Research Service, Information Bulletin 772, 1-19.
74. Heisey P, Lantican M, Dubin H. 2002. Impacts of International Wheat Breeding Research in Developing Countries, 1966-97. CIMMYT: Mexico, D.F.; 1-73.
75. Heisey P, Renkow M. 2003. Agricultural R&D, resources, and productivity. In Land Quality, Agricultural Productivity, and Food Security, K Weiby (ed.). Edward Elgan: Cheltenham (U.K.) and Northampton (U.S.); 404-430.
76. Henry J. 2002. Knowledge is Power; Francis Bacon and the Method of Science. Icon Books: Cambridge; 6, 8.
77. Henzell T, Byerlee D, Mateo N. 2000. Review of Systemwide Programs With an Ecoregional Approach. TAC Secretariat, FAO: Rome, vii, xxiv, 28, 31.
78. Herdt R. 2001. Changing priorities for International Agricultural Research. CMIMYT (Mexico, D.F.), Economies Program, Fifth Distinguished Economics Lecture, 37.
79. Huffman W, Just R. 2000. Setting efficient incentives for agricultural research: lessons from principal-agent theory. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 84: 828-841.
80. IFAD (International Fund for Agricultural Development). 2001. Rural Poverty Report 2001: The Challenge of Ending Rural Poverty. Oxford University Press: Oxford; 135, 136.
81. ISC (Interim Science Council). 2002. Assessment of challenge program pre-proposal: the pilot process. Interim Science Council Secretariat (formerly the Technical Advisory Committee Secretariat), FAO, Rome, January, 1-11.
82. Jefferson T. 1984. Letter to Isaac McPherson, August 13, 1813. In Thomas Jefferson, Writings. The Library of America: New York; 1291.
83. Kanbur R. 2004. Cross-border externalities and international public goods: implications for aid agencies. In Global Tensions: Challenges and Opportunities in the World Economy, Berneria L, Bisnath S (eds). Routledge: New York and London; 73-74.
84. Kanbur R, Sandler T, Morrison K. 1999. The future of development assistance: common pools and international public goods. Overseas Development Council: Washington, Policy Essay No. 25, 70-71.
85. Kapur D. 2002. The common pool dilemma of global public goods: lessons from the World Bank's net income and reserves. World Development 30: 337-354.
86. Kaul I, Grunberg I, Stern M (eds). 1999a. Global Public Goods: International Cooperation in the 21st Century. Oxford University Press: Oxford; 1-546. (Published for UNDP.)
87. Kaul I, Grunberg I, Stern M. 1999b. Introduction. In Kaul I, Grunberg I, Stern M (eds). xxiii.
88. Kaul I, Grunberg I, Stern M. 1999c. Global public goods: concepts, policies and strategies. In Kaul I, Grunberg I, Stern M (eds) 487-488.
89. Kaul I, Le Goulven K. 2001. Global public goods: taking the concept forward. UNDP (New York), Office of Development Studies, Discussion Paper Series #17, 115-131.
90. Kaul I, Conceicao P, Le Goulven K, Mendoza R (eds). 2003. Providing Global Public Goods: Managing Globalization. Oxford University Press: New York and Oxford. (Published for UNDP.)
91. Kaul I, Mendoza R. 2003. Advancing the concept of public goods. In Kaul I, Conceicao P, Le Goulven K, Mendoza R (eds). 81.
92. Kaul I, Conceicao P (eds). 2006. The New Public Finance: Responding to Global Challenges. Oxford University Press: New York and Oxford. (Published for UNDP.)
93. Kindelberger C. 1986. International public goods without international government. American Economic Review 76: 8.
94. Kealey T. 1996. The Economic Laws of Scientific Research. St. Martin's Press: New York; 3-5.
95. Kremer M. 2002. Incentives, institutions, and development assistance. Paper presented at the Forum of Role of Institutions in Supporting Growth, arranged by the IRIS Center at the University of Maryland for USAID, and held in Washington on January 11, 2.
96. Lancaster C. 2007. Foreign Aid: Diplomacy, Development, Domestic Politics. University of Chicago Press: Chicago; 83-91, 100-105.
97. Lucas A. 1991. The insitutional infrastructure for health research in developing countries. In Agriculture, Environment and Health, Ruttan V (ed.). University of Minnesota Press: Minneapolis; 200-201.
98. Mansfield E, Rapoport J, Romeo A, Wagner S, Beardsley G (eds). 1977. Social and private rates of returns from industrial innovations. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 91: 233-235.
99. Maredia M, Byerlee D. (eds). 1999. The Global Wheat Improvement System: Prospects for Enhancing Efficiency in the Presence of Spillovers. CIMMYT (Mexico, D.F.), Research Report No. 5, 1-130.
100. Maredia M, Pingali P. 2001. Environmental Impacts of Productivity-Enhancing Crop Research: A Critical Review. TAC Secretariat, FAO: Rome, 1-19.
101. McCalla A. 1994. Ecoregional basis for international research investment. In Anderson J (ed.), 96-105.
102. Merrill R. 1962. Some society-wide research and development institutions. In The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors. Universities - National Bureau Committee for Economic Research, Conference Series 13. Princeton University Press: Princeton; 431-432.
103. Mokyr J. 1990. The Lever of Riches: Technological Creativity and Economic Progress. Oxford University Press: Oxford; 296.
104. Mowery D, Rosenberg N. 1989. Technology and the Pursuit of Economic Growth. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge; 5.
105. NAS (National Academy of Sciences). 1977. Global Agricultural Research Organization. In Supporting Papers: World Food and Nutrition Study, vol. V (Study Team 14, Agricultural Research Organization), 94-98.
106. Nelson M, Maredia M. 2000. Environmental Impacts of the CGIAR: An Initial Assessment. TAC Secretariat, FAO: Rome, 36-37, 47.
107. Nelson R. 1959. The simple economics of basic scientific research. Journal of Political Economy 67: 297-306.
108. Nelson R. 1987. Understanding Technical Change as an Evolutionary Process. North-Holland: New York; 2-3.
109. Olson M. 1971. The Logic of Collective Action; Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Harvard University Press: Cambridge; 14.
110. Pardey P, Alston J, Christian J, Fan S. 1996. Hidden harvest: U.S. benefits from international research aid. International Food Policy Research Institute, Food Policy Report, Washington, D.C., September.
111. Pardey P, Beintema N. 2001. Slow magic: agricultural R&D a century after Mendel. International Food Policy Research Institute, Food Policy Report, Washington, D.C. 8, 10.
112. Pardey P, Beintema N, Dehmer S, Wood S. 2006. Agricultural research: a growing global divide? International Food Policy Research Institute, Food Policy Report, Washington, D.C., 19.
113. Pardey P, Smith S (eds). 2006. What's Economics Worth? Valuing Policy Research. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore and London. (Published for the International Food Policy Research Institute.)
114. Perrings C, Gadgil M. 2003. Conserving biodiversity: reconciling local and global public benefits. In Kaul I, Conceicao P, Le Goulven K, Mendoza R (eds). 532-555.
115. Peterson W. 1976. Note on the social returns to private research and investment. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 58: 324-326.
116. Pingali P, Rozelle S, Gerpacio R. 2001. The farmer's voice in priority setting: a cross-country experiment in eliciting technological preferences. Economic Development and Social Change 49: 605.
117. Pinstrup-Andersen P. 2005. Public Goods and the CGIAR, CGIAR News, CGIAR Secretariat, World Bank, November, 8.
118. Powell J. 1884. In Testimony before the Joint Commission. U.S. Congress (49th Congress, 1st Session), Senate Misc. Doc. 82, 1886 (testimony on 18 December 1884), 180.
119. Powell J. 1986. In Testimony before the Joint Commission (letter to W.B. Allison, 26 February 1886), 1082.
120. Pray C, Ribeiro S, Mueller R, Rao P. 1991. Private research and public benefit: the private seed industry for sorghum and pearl millet in India. Research Policy 20: 315-324.
121. Pray C, Fuglie K. 2001. Private sector investment in agricultural research and international technology transfer in Asia. U.S. Department of Agriculture (Washington), Economic Research Service, Agricultural Economics Report No. 805, 1-30. [www.ers.usda.gov/ publications/aer805/]
122. Raitzer D. 2003. Benefit-cost meta-analysis of investment in the International Agricultural Research Centers of the CGIAR. Science Council Secretariat, Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, September.
123. Rosenberg N. 1982. Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge; 258.
124. Roseboom J. 2002a. The contribution of agricultural input industries to agricultural innovation. International Service for National Agricultural Research, the Hague.
125. Roseboom J. 2002b. Underinvestment in agricultural R&D revisited. International Service for National Agricultural Research, the Hague.
126. Russett B, Sullivan J. 1971. Collective goods and international organization. International Organization 25: 850, 862.
127. Ruttan V. 1996. United States Development Assistance Policy; The Domestic Politics of Foreign Economic Aid. Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore; 140-145, 415-417.
128. Ruttan V. 2001. Technology, Growth, and Development: An Induced Innovation Perspective. Oxford University Press: Oxford; iii, 539.
129. Ryan J. 2005. International public goods and the CGIAR Niche in the R for D continuum: operationalising concepts. Science Council, Standing Panel on Impact Assessment, Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research, November.
130. Sachs J. 1999. Helping the world's poorest. The Economist, August 14, 17-19.
131. Sachs J. 2000a. A new map of the world. The Economist, June 24, 81-83.
132. Sachs J. 2000b. Globalization and the poor. Talk presented to the CGIAR on October 23 and recorded in the Transcript of Proceedings, CGIAR Secretariat Library, 194-216.
133. Sagasti F, Bezanson K. 2001. Financing and providing global public goods. Swedish Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Stockholm), Development Financing 2000, Study 2001: 2, 17-23 [www.utrikes.regeringen.se/ inenglish/policy/devcoop/financing.htm]
134. Samuelson P. 1954. The pure theory of public expenditure. Review of Economics and Statistics 36: 387-389.
135. Samuelson P. 1955. Diagrammatic exposition of a theory of public expenditure. Review of Economics and Statistics 37: 350-356.
136. Schumpeter J. 1942. Capitalism, Socialization, and Democracy (Part II). Harper & Row: New York; 59-163.
137. Science Council. 2005. System priorities for CGIAR Research 2005-2015, Science Council Secretariat, Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research, 1 December.
138. Sen A. 2001. Economic progress and health. In Poverty, Inequality, and Health: An International Perspective, Leon D, Walt D (eds). Oxford University Press: Oxford; 2002, 334-345.
139. Skolnikoff E. 1971. Science and technology: the implications for international institutions. International Organization 25: 775.
140. Smith A. 1776/2000. The Wealth of Nations. The Modern Library: New York; 778, 779.
141. Solow R. 1957. Technical change and the aggregate production function. The Review of Economics and Statistics 39: 312-320.
142. Stalgren P. 2000. Regional public goods and the future of International Development Cooperation: a review of the literature.... Ministry for Foreign Affairs (Stockholm), Expert Group on Development Issues, Working Paper 2000:2, 1-41.
143. Stenger W. 1992. Beyond the Hundredth Meridian: John Wesley Powell and the Second Opening of the West. Penguin Books: New York; 292.
144. Stiglitz J. 1999. Knowledge as a public good. In Kaul I, Grunberg I, Stern M (eds). 308-325.
145. Swanson J. 1992. The Private and the Public in Aristotle's Political Philosophy. Cornell University Press: Ithaca; 87-90, 208.
146. Summers L. 2000. Speech to the United Nations Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC), New York, July 5. (Text available from Federal News Service, Washington; via Lexis-Nexis database service.)
147. TAC. 2000. CGIAR priorities and strategies for resource allocation during 1998-2000 and centre proposals and TAC recommendations, Technical Advisory Committee Secretariat, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, June, 30.
148. TAC. 1990/1992. A possible expansion of the CGIAR, September 1990, 43. In Expansion of the CGIAR System. Technical Advisory Committee Secretariat, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, June 1992.
149. Thirtle C, Lin L, Piesse J. 2003. The impact of research-led agricultural productivity growth on poverty reduction in Africa, Asia, and Latin America. World Development 31(12): 1973.
150. Tripp R, Pal S. 2001. The private delivery of public crop varieties: rice in Andhra Pradesh. World Development 29(1): 103-107.
151. Victor D, Ausubel J. 2000. Restoring the forests. Foreign affairs 79(6): 127-144.
152. Waibel H, Zimmerman D (eds). 2007. International Research on Natural Resources Management: Advances in Impact Assessment. CABI Publishing: Wallingford.
153. WHO (World Health Organization). 2001. Macroeconomics and health: investing in health for economic development. Geneva, 13, 14, 81-85. [www.cmhealth.org]
154. Wills G. 1999. Saint Augustine. Viking/Penguin: New York; 145.
155. Winkelmann D. 1994. A view of quintessential international agricultural research. In Agricultural Technology: Policy Issues for the International Community, Anderson J (ed.). CAB International: Wallingford; 85-89.
156. World Bank. 2001. Global Development Finance 2001: building coalitions for effective development assistance, analysis and summary tables. Washington, Chp 5, 120. 'Effective Use of Development Finance for International Public Goods', 116-120.
157. World Bank. 2003a. The CGIAR at 31: an independent meta-evaluation of the consultative group on International Agricultural Research. The World Bank (Operations Evaluation Department), Washington, vol. 1, Overview Report, 8-10.
158. World Bank. 2003b. The CGIAR at 31: celebrating its achievements, facing its challenges, Précis, The World Bank (Operations Evaluation Department), Washington, No. 232, Spring, 3, 1-6.
159. World Bank. 2004. Addressing the challenges of globalization: an independent evaluation of the World Bank's approach to global programs, Operations Evaluation Department, Washington, D.C., 1-89.
160. Wuyts M. 1992. Deprivation and public need. In Development Policy and Public Action, Mackintosh M, Hewitt T (eds). Oxford University Press in association with The Open University, Oxford; 30-32.