Technical note: Acceptability curves could be misleading when correlated strategies are compared

Medical Decision Making

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 306-307

  Sadatsafavi, Mohsen ^a   Najafzadeh, Mehdi ^a   Marra, Carlo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MEDICAL PRACTICE; QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR; QUALITY OF LIFE;

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMICS, MEDICAL; FINANCING, PERSONAL; HEALTH CARE COSTS; HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; NEOPLASMS; QUALITY OF LIFE;

EID: 44049091604     PISSN: 0272989X     EISSN: 1552681X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X07312726     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Groot Koerkamp B., Hunink MG, Stijnen T., Hammitt JK, Kuntz KM, Weinstein MC Limitations of acceptability curves for presenting uncertainty in cost-effectiveness analysis. Med Decis Making. 2007 ; 27: 101-11.
2. Fenwick E., Briggs A. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves in the dock: case not proven ? Med Decis Making. 2007 ; 27: 93-5.
3. Schwartz A. The acceptability of acceptability curves: comments on Groot Koerkamp and others. Med Decis Making. 2007 ; 27: 96-7.
4. Fenwick E., Claxton K., Sculpher M. Representing uncertainty: the role of cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. Health Econ. 2001 ; 10: 779-87.
5. O'Hagan A., Stevens JW The probability of cost-effectiveness. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2002 ; 2: 5.