Long-term outcome of secondary endopyelotomy after failed primary intervention for ureteropelvic junction obstruction

International Journal of Urology

Volumn 15, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 490-494

  Park, Jinsung ^a   Kim, Wan S ^a   Hong, Bumsik ^a   Park, Taehan ^a   Park, Hyung K ^a  

^a University of Ulsan College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Endopyelotomy; Treatment failure; Ureteropelvic junction obstruction

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BALLOON DILATATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYDRONEPHROSIS; INTRAVENOUS UROGRAPHY; KIDNEY FUNCTION; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; NEPHRECTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PYELOPLASTY; PYELOTOMY; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TREATMENT FAILURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; KIDNEY PELVIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT FAILURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URETERAL OBSTRUCTION;

EID: 44049089273     PISSN: 09198172     EISSN: 14422042     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2008.02035.x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. O'Reilly PH, Brooman PJ, Mak S et al. The long-term results of Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty. BJU Int. 2001 87 : 287 9.
2. Brooks JD, Kavoussi LR, Preminger GM, Schuessler WW, Moore RG. Comparison of open and endourologic approaches to the obstructed ureteropelvic junction. Urology 1995 46 : 791 5.
3. Biyani CS, Cornford PA, Powell CS. Retrograde endoureteropyelotomy with the holmium: YAG laser: initial experience. Eur. Urol. 1997 32 : 471 4.
4. Karlin GS, Badlani GH, Smith AD. Endopyelotomy versus open pyeloplasty: comparison in 88 patients. J. Urol. 1988 140 : 476 8.
5. Motola JA, Badlani GH, Smith AD. Results of 212 consecutive endopyelotomies: an 8 year follow-up. J. Urol. 1993 149 : 453 6.
6. Van Cangh PJ, Wilmart JF, Opsomer RJ, Abi-Aad A, Wese FX, Lorge F. Long-term results and late recurrence after endoureteropyelotomy: a critical analysis of prognostic factors. J. Urol. 1994 151 : 934 7.
7. Bauer JJ, Bischoff JT, Moore RG, Chen RN, Iverson AJ, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty: assessment of objective and subjective outcome. J. Urol. 1999 162 : 692 5.
8. Siqueira TM Jr., Nadu A, Kuo RL, Paterson RF, Lingeman JE, Shalhav AL. Laparoscopic treatment for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Urology 2002 60 : 973 8.
9. Lim DJ, Walker RD 3rd. Management of the failed pyeloplasty. J. Urol. 1996 156 : 738 40.
10. Motola JA, Fried R, Badlani GH, Smith AD. Failed endopyelotomy: implications for future surgery on the ureteropelvic junction. J. Urol. 1993 150 : 821 3.
11. Hoenig DM, Shalhav AL, Elbahnasy AM, McDougall EM, Smith D, Clayman RV. Impact of etiology of secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction on outcome of endopyelotomy. J. Endourol. 1998 12 : 131 3.
12. Jabbour ME, Goldfischer ER, Klima WJ, Stravodimos KG, Smith AD. Endopyelotomy after failed pyeloplasty: the long-term results. J. Urol. 1998 160 : 690 2 discussion 692-3.
13. Fernbach SK, Maizels M, Conway JJ. Ultrasound grading of hydronephrosis: introduction to the system used by the Society for Fetal Urology. Pediatr. Radiol. 1993 23 : 478 80.
14. Wickham JE, Kellet MJ. Percutaneous pyelolysis. Eur. Urol. 1983 9 : 122 4.
15. Badlani G, Eshghi M, Smith AD. Percutaneous surgery for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (endopyelotomy): technique and early results. J. Urol. 1986 135 : 26 8.
16. Ng CS, Yost AJ, Streem SB. Management of failed primary intervention for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: 12-year, single-center experience. Urology 2003 61 : 291 6.
17. Di Grazia E, Nicolosi D. Ureteroscopic laser endopyelotomy in secondary UPJ obstruction after pyeloplasty failure. Urol. Int. 2005 75 : 333 6.
18. Ost MC, Kaye JD, Guttman MJ, Lee BR, Smith AD. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus antegrade endopyelotomy: comparison in 100 patients and a new algorithm for the minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Urology 2005 66 : 47 51.
19. Ono Y, Ohshima S, Kinukawa T, Sahashi M, Yamada S. Endopyeloureterotomy via a transpelvic extraureteral approach. J. Urol. 1992 147 : 352 5.
20. Van Cangh PJ, Jorion JL, Wese FX, Opsomer RJ. Endoureteropyelotomy: percutaneous treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J. Urol. 1989 141 : 1317 21 discussion 1321-2.
21. Varkarakis IM, Bhayani SB, Allaf ME et al. Management of secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction after failed primary laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J. Urol. 2004 172 : 180 2.
22. Thomas JC, Demarco RT, Donohoe JM et al. Management of the failed pyeloplasty: a contemporary review. J. Urol. 2005 174 : 2363 6.
23. Danuser H, Ackermann DK, Bohlen D, Studer UE. Endopyelotomy for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction: risk factors determine the success rate. J. Urol. 1998 159 : 56 61.
24. Dimarco DS, Gettman MT, McGee SM et al. Long-term success rate of antegrade endopyelotomy compared with pyeloplasty at a single institution. J. Endourol. 2006 20 : 707 12.
25. Nakada SY, Wolf JS Jr., Brink JA et al. Retrospective analysis of the effect of crossing vessels on successful retrograde endopyelotomy outcomes using spiral computerized tomography angiography. J. Urol. 1998 159 : 62 5.
26. Lam JS, Cooper KL, Greene TD, Gupta M. Impact of hydronephrosis and renal function on treatment outcome: antegrade versus retrograde endopyelotomy. Urology 2003 61 : 1107 11 discussion 1111-12.