Comparability of contraceptive prevalence estimates for women from the 2002 behavioral risk factor surveillance system

Public Health Reports

Volumn 123, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 147-154

  Santelli, John ^a   Lindberg, Laura Duberstein ^b   Finer, Lawrence B ^b   Rickert, Vaughn I ^a   Bensyl, Diana ^c   Posner, Sam ^c   Makleff, Shelly ^d   Kost, Kathryn ^b   Singh, Susheela ^b  

^a Department of Medicine   (United States)

^b GUTTMACHER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION   (United States)

^d International Planned Parenthood Federation/Western Hemisphere Region ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRACEPTIVE AGENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIORAL RISK FACTOR SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM; COITUS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTRACEPTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; ETHNICITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; INCOME; INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE; MARRIED WOMAN; PREGNANCY; PREGNANT WOMAN; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RACE; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; VASECTOMY; ADOLESCENT; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; INFORMATION PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY; SOCIOECONOMICS; UNITED STATES; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BEHAVIORAL RISK FACTOR SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM; CONTRACEPTION; CONTRACEPTION BEHAVIOR; DATA COLLECTION; FEMALE; HEALTH PLANNING; HUMANS; PREVALENCE; RESEARCH DESIGN; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 44049085858     PISSN: 00333549     EISSN: 14682877     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/003335490812300207     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Bensyl DM, Iuliano DA, Carter M, Santelli J, Gilbert BC. Contraceptive use-United States and territories, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2002. MMWR Surveill Summ 2005;54(6):1-72.
2. Chandra A, Martinez GM, Mosher WD, Abma JC, Jones J. Fertility, family planning, and reproductive health of U.S. women: data from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth. Vital Health Stat 2005;23(25):1-160.
3. Groves RM, Benson G, Mosher WD, Rosenbaum J, Granda P, Axinn W, et al. Plan and operation of Cycle 6 of the National Survey of Family Growth. Vital Health Stat 2005;1(42):1-86.
4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US). Overview: BRFSS 2002. 2003 [cited 2006 Feb 20]. Available from: URL: http://www.cdc.gov/brfss/ technical-infodata/surveydata/2002/overview-02.rtf
5. Lepkowski JM, Mosher WD, Davis KE, Groves RM, van Hoewyk J, Willem J. National Survey of Family Growth, Cycle 6: sample design, weighting, imputation, and variance estimation. Vital Health Stat 2006;2(142):1-82.
6. CDC (US); National Center for Health Statistics. National Survey of Family Growth Cycle 6: 2002 user's guide, appendix 2: recode specifications for female respondent file, female pregnancy file, and male file. 2004 [cited 2006 Feb 16]. Available from: URL: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nsfg/App2- RecodeSpecs.pdf
7. SAS Institute Inc. SAS: Version 9.1.3. Cary (NC): SAS Institute Inc.; 2004.
8. SPSS Inc. SPSS: Version 14.0 for Windows. Chicago: SPSS Inc.; 2005.
9. CDC (US). 2002 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System summary data quality report. 2003 [cited 2006 Feb 20]. Available from: URL: http://www.cdc.gov/brfss/technical-infodata/pdf/2002SummaryDataQualityReport.pdf
10. Blumberg SJ, Luke JV, Cynamon ML. Telephone coverage and health survey estimates: evaluating the need for concern about wireless substitution. Am J Public Health 2006;96:926-931
11. Nelson DE, Holtzman D, Bolen J, Stanwyck CA, Mack KA. Reliability and validity of measures from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). Soz Praventivmed 2001;46 Suppl 1:S3-42. (Pubitemid 34121456)