EU eastern enlargement and foreign investment: Implications from a neoclassical growth model

Journal of Comparative Economics

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 307-325

  Garmel, Kateryna ^a   Maliar, Lilia ^b   Maliar, Serguei ^b  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF KYIV MOHYLA ACADEMY   (Ukraine)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALICANTE   (Spain)

Author keywords

Capital flows; EU enlargement; Foreign direct investment; Neoclassical growth model; Three country model; Transition economies

Indexed keywords

EID: 43949127098     PISSN: 01475967     EISSN: 10957227     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jce.2007.04.003     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Åslund, A., Warner, A., 2002. The EU enlargement: Consequences for the CIS countries. Mimeo
2. Baldwin R., Francois J., and Portes R. The costs and benefits of eastern enlargement: The impact on the EU and Central Europe. Economic Policy 24 (1997) 127-176
3. Boyarchuk D., Maliar L., and Maliar S. The consumption and welfare implications of wage arrears in transition economies. Journal of Comparative Economics 33 3 (2005) 540-567
4. Brainard L. An empirical assessment of the proximity concentration trade-off between multinational sales and trade. American Economic Review 87 (1997) 520-544
5. Breuss F., Egger P., and Pfaffermayr P. The impact of Agenda 2000's structural policy reform on FDI in the EU. Journal of Policy Modeling 23 (2001) 807-820
6. Breuss, F., Egger, P., Pfaffermayr, P., 2003. Structural funds, EU enlargement, and the redistribution of FDI in Europe. Working paper No. 195. WIFO, Vienna
7. Buch, C., Kokta, R., Piazolo, D., 2001. Does the East get what would otherwise flow to the South? Working paper 1061. FDI Diversion in Europe, Kiel
8. Carstensen K., and Toubal F. Foreign direct investment in Central and Eastern European countries: A dynamic panel analysis. Journal of Comparative Economics 32 1 (2004) 3-22
9. Christiano L., and Fisher J. Algorithms for solving dynamic models with occasionally binding constraints. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 24 (2000) 1179-1232
10. Deichmann J., Eshghi A., Haughton D., Sayek S., and Teebagy N. Foreign direct investment in the Eurasian transition states. Eastern European Economics 41 1 (2003) 5-34
11. Di Mauro, F., 2000. The impact of economic integration on FDI and exports: A gravity approach. Working document 156. CEPS
12. Egger, P., Pfaffermayr, M., 2002. Foreign direct investment and European integration in the 90s. Working paper No. 2. University of Innsbruck
13. Ekholm, K., Forslid, R., Markusen, J., 2003. Export-platform foreign direct investment. Working paper No. 9517. NBER.
14. Garmel, K., Maliar, L., Maliar, S., 2005. The EU Eastern enlargement and FDI: The implications from a neoclassical growth model. AD Working paper No. 29. IVIE
15. Gorman W. Community preference field. Econometrica 21 (1953) 63-80
16. Görg H., and Strobl E. Multinational companies and productivity spillovers: A meta-analysis. Economic Journal 111 (2001) 723-739
17. Grabbe H. Opening up the business opportunities of EU enlargement. European Business Journal 13 3 (2001) 127-148
18. Grabbe H. The implications of EU enlargement, developments in Central and Eastern European politics. In: White S., Lewis P., and Batt J. (Eds). Development in Central and East European Politics vol. 3 (2003), Duke Univ. Press, Palgrave 253-290
19. Graham, E., Krugman, P., 1989. Foreign direct investment in the United States. Institute for International Economics, Washington, DC
20. Henriot, A., 2003. Prospects for the location of industrial activities after EU enlargement. WP 61. COE
21. Juster F., and Stafford F. The allocation of time: empirical findings, behavioral models, and problems of measurement. Journal of Economic Literature 29 (1991) 471-522
22. Kollmann R. Welfare effects of a monetary union: The role of trade openness. Journal of European Economic Association 2 2-3 (2004) 289-301
23. Lankes H., and Venables A. Foreign direct investment in economic transition: The changing pattern of investments. Economics of Transition 4 2 (1996) 331-347
24. Maliar L., and Maliar S. Heterogeneity in capital and skills in a neoclassical stochastic growth model. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 25 9 (2001) 1367-1397
25. Maliar L., and Maliar S. The representative consumer in the neoclassical growth model with idiosyncratic shocks. Review of Economic Dynamics 6 (2003) 362-380
26. Maliar L., and Maliar S. Parameterized expectations algorithm: How to solve for labour easily. Computational Economics 25 (2005) 269-274
27. Maliar L., and Maliar S. The neoclassical growth model with heterogeneous quasi-geometric consumers. Journal of Money, Credit, Banking 38 3 (2006) 635-654
28. Markusen J., and Venables A. Multinational firms and the new trade theory. Journal of International Economics 46 2 (1998) 183-203
29. Smets F., and Wouters R. An estimated dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model of the Euro area. Journal of the European Economic Association 1 (2003) 1123-1175