Electron and spin transport in the presence of a complex absorbing potential

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 77, Issue 19, 2008, Pages

  Doǧan, Fatih ^a   Kim, Wonkee ^a,b   Blois, C M ^a,c   Marsiglio, F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 43949094193     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.195107     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. J. G. Muga, J. P. Palao, B. Navarro, and I. L. Egusquiza, Phys. Rep. PRPLCM 0370-1573 10.1016/j.physrep.2004.03.002 395, 357 (2004).
2. R. A. Horn and C. R. Johnson, Matrix Analysis (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1985).
3. A. Vibok and G. Balint-Kurt, J. Chem. Phys. JCPSA6 0021-9606 10.1063/1.462414 96, 7615 (1992).
4. C. M. Bender and S. Boettcher, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.5243 80, 5243 (1998).
5. S. Midgley and J. B. Wang, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.61.920 61, 920 (2000).
6. A. J. Rasmussen, S. J. Jeffrey, and S. C. Smith, Chem. Phys. Lett. CHPLBC 0009-2614 10.1016/S0009-2614(01)00096-3 336, 149 (2001).
7. A. Neumaier and V. A. Mandelshtam, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.5031 86, 5031 (2001).
8. R. Santra and L. S. Cederbaum, Phys. Rep. PRPLCM 0370-1573 10.1016/S0370-1573(02)00143-6 368, 1 (2002).
9. N. Moiseyev, S. Scheit, and L. S. Cederbaum, J. Chem. Phys. JCPSA6 0021-9606 10.1063/1.1709867 121, 722 (2004).
10. N. Moiseyev, Phys. Rep. PRPLCM 0370-1573 10.1016/S0370-1573(98)00002-7 302, 212 (1998).
11. U. V. Riss and H.-D. Meyer, J. Phys. B JPAPEH 0953-4075 10.1088/0953-4075/26/23/021 26, 4503 (1993).
12. U. V. Riss and H.-D. Meyer, J. Chem. Phys. JCPSA6 0021-9606 10.1063/1.472003 105, 1409 (1996).
13. W. Kim, L. Covaci, and F. Marsiglio, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.205120 74, 205120 (2006).
14. Some modification is needed to make the eigenstates satisfy the c -product normalization because the numerical driver provides the eigenstates with the Euclidean normalization. This procedure is, in fact, helpful in making sure that no eigenstates are self-orthogonal.
15. In order to see the precession of the local spin, one needs to evaluate S+ (t), where S+ = Sx +i Sy.
16. M. K. Oberthaler, R. Abfalterer, S. Bernet, C. Keller, J. Schmiedmayer, and A. Zeilinger, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.60.456 60, 456 (1999).
17. S. Bernet, R. Abfalterer, C. Keller, M. K. Oberthaler, J. Schmiedmayer, and A. Zeilinger, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.62.023606 62, 023606 (2000).
18. R. Stützle, M. C. Göbel, Th. Hörner, E. Kierig, I. Mourachko, M. K. Oberthaler, M. A. Efremov, M. V. Fedorov, V. P. Yakovlev, K. A. H. van Leeuwen, and W. P. Schleich, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.110405 95, 110405 (2005).