Implicit LES applied to zero-pressure-gradient and adverse-pressure-gradient boundary-layer turbulence

International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 626-639

  Hickel, S ^a   Adams, N A ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Boundary layer; Large eddy simulation; Separation; Subgrid scale modeling; Transition

Indexed keywords

BOUNDARY LAYER FLOW; DECONVOLUTION; FLOW SEPARATION; LARGE EDDY SIMULATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PRESSURE GRADIENT; REYNOLDS NUMBER;

ADAPTIVE LOCAL DECONVOLUTION METHOD (ALDM); SUBGRID-SCALE MODELING;

TURBULENT FLOW;

BOUNDARY LAYER FLOW; DECONVOLUTION; FLOW SEPARATION; LARGE EDDY SIMULATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PRESSURE GRADIENT; REYNOLDS NUMBER; TURBULENT FLOW;

EID: 43949086006     PISSN: 0142727X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2008.03.008     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Castillo L., and George W.K. Similarity analysis for turbulent boundary layer with pressure gradient: outerflow. AIAA J. 39 1 (2001) 41-47
2. Castillo L., Wang X., and George W.K. Separation criterion for turbulent boundary layers via similarity analysis. J. Fluids Eng. 126 1 (2004) 297-303
3. Clauser F.H. Turbulent boundary layers in adverse pressure gradient. J. Aeronaut. Sci. 21 (1954) 91-108
4. Domaradzki J.A., and Radhakrishnan S. Eddy viscosities in implicit large eddy simulations of decaying high Reynolds number turbulence with and without rotation. Fluid Dynam. Res. 36 (2005) 385-406
5. Fernholz H.-H. Halbempirische Gesetze zur Berechnung turbulenter Grenzschichten nach der Methode der Integralbedingungen. Ingenieur-Archiv 33 6 (1964) 384-395
6. In: Grinstein F., Margolin L., and Rider W. (Eds). Implicit Large Eddy Simulation: Computing Turbulent Flow Dynamics (2007), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
7. Head M.R., and Ram V.V. Improved presentation of preston tube calibration. Aeronaut. Quat. 22 (1971) 295-300
8. Hickel S., and Adams N.A. Efficient implementation of nonlinear deconvolution methods for implicit large-eddy simulation. In: Nagel W., Jäger W., and Resch M. (Eds). High Performance Computing in Science and Engineering. Transactions of the High Performance Computing Center, Stuttgart (HLRS) (2006), Springer 293-306
9. Hickel S., and Adams N.A. On implicit subgrid-scale modeling in wall-bounded flows. Phys. Fluids 19 (2007) 105106
10. Hickel S., Adams N.A., and Domaradzki J.A. An adaptive local deconvolution method for implicit LES. J. Comp. Phys. 213 (2006) 413-436
11. Hickel S., Adams N.A., and Mansour N.N. Implicit subgrid-scale modeling for large-eddy simulation of passive-scalar mixing. Phys. Fluids 19 (2007) 095102
12. Hickel, S., T. Kempe, and N.A. Adams (2007). Implicit large-eddy simulation applied to turbulent channel flow with periodic constrictions. Theoret. Comput. Fluid Dynamics, in press. doi:10.1007/s00162-007-0069-7.
13. Indinger, T. (2005). Einfluss eines positiven Druckgradienten auf turbulente Grenzschichten an glatten und gerillten Oberflächen. Ph. D. thesis, TU München.
14. Indinger T., Buschmann M.H., and Gad-el-Hak M. Mean-velocity profile of turbulent boundary layers approaching separation. AIAA J. 44 11 (2006) 2465-2474
15. Indinger, T., Hickel, S., Adams, N., 2004. 3d-measurements in an adverse-pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layer over smooth and ribbed surfaces. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Congress of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics (ICTAM), Warsaw, Poland.
16. Kalter M., and Fernholz H.H. The reduction and elimination of a closed separation region by free-stream turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 446 (2001) 271-308
17. Lund T., Wu X., and Squires K. Generation of turbulent inflow data for spatially-developing boundary layer simulations. J. Comp. Phys. 140 (1998) 233-258
18. Manhart M., and Friedrich R. DNS of a turbulent boundary layer with separation. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 23 (2002) 572-581
19. Morinishi Y., Lund T., Vasilyev O., and Moin P. Fully conservative higher order finite difference schemes for incompressible flow. J. Comput. Phys. 143 (1998) 90-124
20. Na Y., and Moin P. Direct numerical simulation of a separated turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 374 (1998) 379-405
21. Na Y., and Moin P. The structure of wall-pressure fluctuations in turbulent boundary layers with adverse pressure gradient and separation. J. Fluid Mech. 377 (1998) 347-373
22. Patel V.C. Calibration of the Preston tube and limitations on its use in pressure gradients. J. Fluid Mech. 23 1 (1965) 185-208
23. Schlichting H. (1979), McGraw-Hill
24. Shu C.-W. Total-variation-diminishing time discretizations. SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput. 9 6 (1988) 1073-1084
25. Simpson R.L. A review of some phenomena in turbulent flow separation. J. Fluids Eng. 102 (1981) 520-533
26. Simpson R.L. Turbulent boundary-layer separation. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 21 (1989) 205-234
27. θ = 1410. J. Fluid Mech. 187 (1988) 61-98
28. Spalart P.R., and Coleman G.N. Numerical study of a separation bubble with heat transfer. Eur. J. Mech. B Fluids 16 (1997) 169-189
29. van der Vorst H. Bi-CGSTAB: A fast and smoothly converging variant of Bi-CG for the solution of nonsymmetric linear systems. SIAM J. Sci. Statist. Comput. 13 (1992) 631-644