Contributing to the academic conversation: A study of new knowledge claims in economics and linguistics

Journal of Pragmatics

Volumn 40, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 1184-1201

  Dahl, Trine ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (Norway)

Author keywords

Academic discourse; Cross disciplinary; Economics; Knowledge claims; Linguistics

Indexed keywords

EID: 43849112485     PISSN: 03782166     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.11.006     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Becher T. Academic Tribes and Territories. Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines (1989), The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press, Milton Keynes
2. Berkenkotter C., and Huckin T.N. Genre Knowledge in Disciplinary Communication: Cognition/Culture/Power (1995), Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
3. Beyer J.M., Chanove R.G., and Fox W.B. The review process and the fates of manuscripts submitted to AMJ. Academy of Management Journal 38 5 (1995) 1219-1260
4. Bloor M., and Bloor T. How economists modify propositions. In: Henderson W., Dudley-Evans T., and Backhouse R. (Eds). Economics and Language (1993), Routledge, London/New York 153-169
5. Bondi M. Metadiscursive practices in academic discourse: variation across disciplines. In: Bamford J., and Bondi M. (Eds). Dialogue Within Discourse Communities (2005), Max Niemeyer Verlag, Tübingen 3-29
6. Bunton, David, 1999. The use of higher level metatext in Ph.D. theses. English for Specific Purposes 18 (Suppl. 1) S41-S56.
7. Cochrane, John, 2005. Writing tips for Ph.D. students. http://faculty.chicagogsb.edu/john.cochrane/research/Papers/phd_paper_writing.pdf.
8. Fløttum K., Dahl T., and Kinn T. Academic Voices (2006), John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia
9. Fredrickson K., and Swales J. Competition and discourse community: introductions from 'Nysvenska studier'. In: Gunnarsson B.-L., Linell P., and Nordberg B. (Eds). Text and Talk in Professional Contexts (1994), ASLA, Stockholm 9-21
10. Hunston S. Professional conflict. Disagreement in academic discourse. In: Baker M., Francis G., and Tognini-Bonelli E. (Eds). Text and Technology. In Honour of John Sinclair (1993), John Benjamins, Philadelphia/Amsterdam 115-134
11. Hyland K. Hedging in Scientific Research Articles (1998), John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia
12. Hyland K. Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing (2000), Longman, Harlow, UK
13. Lindeberg A.-C. Promotion and Politeness. Conflicting Scholarly Rhetoric in Three Disciplines (2004), Åbo Akademi University Press, Åbo
14. Mauranen A. Contrastive ESP rhetoric: metatext in Finnish-English economics texts. English for Specific Purposes 12 (1993) 3-22
15. McCloskey D. The rhetoric of economics. Journal of Economic Literature XXI (1983) 481-517
16. Myers G. The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles. Applied Linguistics 10 1 (1989) 1-35
17. Myers G. 'In this paper we report...': speech acts and scientific facts. Journal of Pragmatics 17 (1992) 295-313
18. Swales J. Genre Analysis (1990), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
19. Swales J. Research Genres. Exploration and Applications (2004), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
20. Vold E.T. Epistemic modality markers in research articles: a cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinary study. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 16 (2006) 61-87