Karyotypic studies in Arachis hypogaea L. varieties

Caryologia

Volumn 57, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 353-359

  Inés, Lavia Graciela ^a,b   Fernández, Aveliano ^a,c  

^a INSTITUTO DE BOTÁNICA DEL NORDESTE   (Argentina)

^b UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DEL NORDESTE   (Argentina)

^c Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales y Agrimensura (UNNE)   (Argentina)

Author keywords

Arachis hypogaea; Chromosomes; Karyotypes; Peanut; Varieties

Indexed keywords

ARACHIS; ARACHIS HYPOGAEA;

EID: 43849105468     PISSN: 00087114     EISSN: 21655391     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00087114.2004.10589416     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Cai Q., Lu S. and Chinnappa C.C., 1987. Analysis of karyotypes and Giemsa C-banding patterns in eight species of Arachis. Genome, 29: 187-194.
2. D’Cruz R. and Tankasale M.P., 1961. A note on chromosome complement of four groundnut varieties. Indian Oilseeds J., 5:58-59.
3. De Carvalho R. and Guerra M., 2002. Cytogenetics of Manihot esculenta Crantz (cassava) and eight related species. Hereditas, 136:159-168.
4. Fernandez A., 1973. El dcido lactico como fijador cromosomico. Bol. Soc. Argent. Bot., 15:287-290.
5. Fernandez A. and Krapovickas, A., 1994. Cromo-somas y evolucion en Arachis (Leguminosae). Bonplandia, 8 (l-4):187-220.
6. Guerra M., 1993. Cytogenetics ofRutaceae. V. High chromosomal variability in Citrus species revealed by CMA/DAPI staining. Heredity, 71:234-241.
7. Halward T.M., Stalker H.T., LaRue E.A and Ko-chert G., 1991. Genetic variation detectable with molecular markers among unadapted germ-plasm resources of cultivated peanut and related wild species. Genome, 34:1013-1020.
8. Husted L., 1933. Cytological Studies on the Peanut, Arachis. I. Chromosome number and morphology. Cytologia, 5:109-117.
9. Husted L., 1936. Cytological Studies on the Peanut, Arachis. II. Chromosome number, morphology and their application to the problem of the origin of the cultivated forms. Cytologia, 7:396-423.
10. Kochert G., Halward T., Branch W.D. and Simpson C.E., 1991. RFLP variability in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) cultivars and wild species. Theor. Appl. Genet., 81:565-570.
11. Krapovickas A. and Gregory W.C., 1994. Tax-onomia del gėnero Arachis (Leguminosae). Bonplandia, 8: 1-186.
12. Lavia G.I., Fernandez A. and Seijo J.G., 2001 Avarices en la caracterizacion cromosomica de Arachis. Actas III Reunion de Especialistas en Arachis y III Simposio de Recursos Genėticos para America Latina y Caribe. Londrina, SP, Brasil. 11/2001.
13. Levan A., Fredga K. and Sandberg A.A., 1964. Nomenclature for centromeric position on chromosomes. Hereditas, 52: 201-220.
14. Moscone E.A., Klein E., Lambrou M., Fuchs J. and Schweizer D., 1999. Quantitative karyotyping and dual-color FISH mapping of 5S and 18S-25S rDNA probes in the cultivated Phaseolus species (Leguminosae). Genome, 42:1224-1233.
15. Rolhf F.J., 1994. NTSYS-pc. Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system, version 1.8. Exeter Software, New York, USA.
16. Romero Zarco C., 1986. A new method for estimating karyotype asymmetry. Taxon, 35:526-530.
17. Seijo J.G., Lavia G.I., Fernandez A., Krapovickas A., Ducasse D. and Moscone E.A., 2004. Physical mapping of 5 S and 18S-25S rRNA genes evidences that Arachis duranensis and A. ipaensis are the wild diploid species involved in the origin of A. hypogaea (Leguminosae). Am. J. Bot. 91: 2293-2303.
18. Singh A.K. and Moss J.P., 1982. Utilization of Wild Relatives in Genetic Improvement of Arachis hypogaea L. Part 2: Chromosome Complements of Species in Section Arachis. Theor. Appl. Genet., 61: 305-314.
19. Stalker H.T. and Dalmacio R.D., 1986. Karyotype analysis and relationships among varieties of Arachis hypogaea L. Cytologia 51:617-629.
20. Stebbins G.L., 1957 Genetics, evolution, and plant breeding. Indian J. Genet. PI. Breed., 17:129-141.
21. Stebbins G.L., 1971. Chromosomal evolution in higher plants. Edward Arnold Publ. Ltd., London.