Responses on a cautionary tale concerning the ethics of using respondent-driven sampling to study injection drug users

International Journal of Drug Policy

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 246-247

  Scott, Greg ^a  

^a DEPAUL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL STUDY; DRUG DEPENDENCE; DRUG RESEARCH; DRUG USE; ECONOMIC ASPECT; ETHNOGRAPHY; GEOGRAPHY; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS INFECTION; INCIDENCE; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL STAFF; MEMORY; MORALITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOLOGICAL BALANCE; PUBLICATION; SURVIVAL;

EID: 43849099552     PISSN: 09553959     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2008.03.008     Document Type: Note

References (5)

1. R.S. Broadhead Notes on a cautionary (tall) tale about respondent-driven sampling: a critique of Scott's ethnography International Journal of Drug Policy 19 3 2008 235 237
2. A. Lansky T.D. Mastro Using respondent-driven sampling for behavioural surveillance: response to Scott International Journal of Drug Policy 19 3 2008 241 243
3. L. Ouellet Response: cautionary comments on an ethnographic tale gone wrong International Journal of Drug Policy 19 3 2008 238 240
4. N.G. Prachand N.D. Benbow Clarifying the ethnographer's role in Chicago's HIV behavioural surveillance—injecting drug users cycle, 2005: response to Scott International Journal of Drug Policy 19 3 2008 244 245
5. G. Scott “They got their program and I got mine”: a cautionary tale concerning the ethical implications of using respondent-driven sampling to study injection drug users International Journal of Drug Policy 19 2 2008 42 51