Flocculants effect in biomass retention in a UASB reactor treating dairy manure

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 99, Issue 14, 2008, Pages 6028-6036

  Garcia H ^a   Rico, C ^a   Garcia P A ^b   Rico, J L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTABRIA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VALLADOLID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Dairy manure; Liquid fraction; Methane; Solids removal; UASB reactor

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS; FLOCCULATION; METHANE; POLYACRYLATES;

DAIRY MANURE; LIQUID FRACTION; SOLIDS REMOVAL; UASB REACTOR;

SEWAGE TREATMENT;

POLYACRYLAMIDE;

BIOMASS; FLOCCULATION; METHANE; POLYACRYLATES; SEWAGE TREATMENT;

BIOMASS; BIOREACTOR; EFFLUENT; FLOCCULATION; MANURE; METHANE; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; POLLUTANT REMOVAL; POLYMER;

BIOMASS; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; DAIRY CATTLE; EFFLUENT; FLOCCULATION; MANURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; UPFLOW REACTOR;

ANIMALS; BIOMASS; BIOREACTORS; CATTLE; DAIRYING; FLOCCULATION; MANURE;

EID: 43849092797     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.11.037     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. Alphenaar P.A., Visser A., and Lettinga G. The effect of liquid upflow velocity and hydraulic retention time on granulation in UASB reactor treating wastewater with high-sulphate content. Bioresour. Technol. 43 (1993) 249-258
2. Alves M., Cavaleiro A.J., Ferreira E.C., Amaral A.L., da Motta M., Vivier H., and Pons M.N. Characterization by image analysis of anaerobic sludge under shock conditions. Water Sci. Technol. 41 (2000) 207-214
3. Asinari Di San Marzano C., Binot R., Bol T., Fripiat J., Hutschemakers J., Melchior J., Perez I., Naveau H., and Nyns E. Volatile fatty acids, an important state parameter for the control of the reliability and the productivities of methane anaerobic digestions. Biomass 1 (1981) 47-59
4. Barrow J., Van Horn H., Anderson D.Y., and Nordstedt R. Effects of Fe and Ca additions to dairy wastewaters on solid and nutrient removal by sedimentation. Appl. Eng. Agric. 13 2 (1997) 259-267
5. El-Mamouni R., Leduc R., Guiot S.R., and Costerton J.W. Influence of the microbial content of different precursory nuclei on the anaerobic granulation dynamics. Water Sci. Technol. 32 8 (1995) 173-177
6. El-Mamouni R., Leduc R., and Guiot S.R. Influence of the starting microbial nucleus type on the anaerobic granulation dynamics. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 47 (1997) 189-194
7. El-Mamouni R., Leduc R., and Guiot S.R. Influence of synthetic and natural polymers on the anaerobic granulation process. Water Sci. Technol. 38 8-9 (1998) 341-347
8. Fang H.P., Chui H.K., and Li Y.Y. Microbial structure and activity of UASB granules treating different wastewaters. Water Sci. Technol. 30 12 (1994) 87-96
9. Field J., Sierra R., and Lettinga G. Ensayos anaerobios. 4° Seminario sobre Depuración Anaerobia de Aguas Residuales (1988), Springer, USA pp. 52-81
10. Hartman H., Angelidaki I., and Ahring B.B. Increase of anaerobic digestion of particulate organic matter in full-scale biogas plants by mechanical separation. Water Sci. Technol. 41 3 (2000) 45-53
11. Hill D.T. Methane productivity of the major animal waste types. Trans. ASAE 27 2 (1984) 530-534
12. Imai T., Ukita M., Liu J., Sekine M., Nakanishi H., and Fukagawa M. Advance start up of UASB reactors by adding of water absorbing polymer. Water Sci. Technol. 15 6-7 (1997) 399-406
13. Jian C., and Lun S.Y. Study of mechanism of anaerobic sludge granulation in UASB reactors. Water Sci. Technol. 28 7 (1993) 171-178
14. Kalyuzhnyi S.V., Skylar V.I., Davlyatshina M.A., Parshina S.N., Simankova M.V., Kostrikina N.A., and Nozhevnikova A.N. Organic removal and microbiological features of UASB reactor under various organic loading rates. Bioresour. Technol. 55 (1996) 47-54
15. Kosaric N., Blaszcyk R., Orphan L., and Valladares J. The characteristics of granules from upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors. Water Res. 24 (1990) 1473-1477
16. Lettinga G., Van Velsen A.F., Hobma S.W., Zeeuw W., and Klapwy A. Use of the upflow sludge blanket (USB) reactor concept for biological wastewater treatment especially for anaerobic treatment. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 22 (1980) 699-734
17. Liu Y., Xu H.L., Show K.Y., and Tay J.H. Anaerobic granulation technology for wastewater treatment. World. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 18 (2002) 99-113
18. Lo K.V., Lau A., and Liao P.H. Composting of separated solid swine wastes. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 54 4 (1993) 307-317
19. Møller H.B., Lund I., and Sommer S.G. Solid-liquid separation of livestock slurry: efficiency and cost. Bioresour. Technol. 74 (2000) 223-229
20. Møller H.B., Sommer S.G., and Ahring B.K. Separation efficiency and particle size distribution in relation to manure type and storage conditions. Bioresour. Technol. 85 (2002) 189-196
21. Møller H.B., Somer S.G., and Ahring B.K. Methane productivity of manure, straw and solid fractions of manure. Biomass Bioenergy 27 2 (2004) 530-534
22. Morgan J.W., Forster C.F., and Evison L.M. A comparative study of the nature of biopolymer extracted from anaerobic and activated sludge. Water Res. 24 6 (1990) 743-750
23. Patni N.K., and Jui P.Y. Volatile fatty acids in stored dairy-cattle slurry. Agric. Wastes 13 (1985) 159-178
24. Powers W.J., Montoya R.E., Van Horn H.H., Nordstedt R.A., and Bucklin R.A. Separation of manure solids from simulated flushed manures by screening or sedimentation. Appl. Eng. Agric. 11 3 (1995) 431-436
25. Rico J.L., Garci{dotless}́a H., Rico C., and Tejero I. Characterisation of solid and liquid fractions of dairy manure with regard to their component distribution and methane production. Bioresour. Technol. 98 (2007) 971-979
26. Schmidt J.E., and Ahring B.K. Granular sludge formation in upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactors. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 49 (1996) 229-246
27. Show K.Y., Wang Y., Foong S.F., and Tay J.H. Accelerated start-up and enhanced granulation in upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors. Water Res. 38 (2004) 2293-2304
28. Sneath R.W., Shaw M., and Williams A.G. Centrifugation for separating piggery slurry. 1. The performance of a decanting centrifuge. J. Agric. Sci. 124 (1988) 45-53
29. Standard methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 1995. 19th ed., American Public Health Association/American Water Works Association/ Water Environment Federation, Washington DC, USA.
30. Tay J.H., and Yan Y.G. Influence of substrate concentration on microbial selection and granulation during start-up of upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors. Water Environ. Res. 68 (1996) 1140-1150
31. Tiwari M.K., Guha S., Harendranath C.S., and Tripathi S. Enhanced granulation by natural ionic polymer additives in UASB reactor treating low-strength wastewater. Water Res. 39 (2005) 3801-3810
32. Uyanik S., Sallis P.J., and Anderson G.K. The effect of polymer addition on granulation in an anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR). Part I: Process performance. Water Res. 36 (2002) 933-943
33. Uyanik S., Sallis P.J., and Anderson G.K. The effect of polymer addition on granulation in an anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR). Part II: Compartmentalization of bacterial populations. Water Res. 36 (2002) 944-955
34. 2+ on sludge granulation in upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor. Water Sci. Technol. 41 15 (2000) 199-205
35. Yu H.Q., Fang H.H.P., and Tay J.H. The roles of calcium in sludge granulation in upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor. Water Sci. Technol. 27 4 (2001) 1052-1060
36. Zeeman, G., 1991. Mesophilic and psychrophilic digestion of liquid manure. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Wageningen, The Netherlands.
37. Zhang R.H., and Westerman P.W. Solid-liquid separation of animal manure for odour control and nutrient management. Appl. Eng. Agric. 13 5 (1997) 657-664
38. Zhang R.H., and Lei F. Chemical treatment of animal manure for solid-liquid separation. Trans. ASAE 41 4 (1998) 1103-1108