Incidental sanctions and the evolution of direct benefits

Ethology

Volumn 114, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 521-539

  Wagner Jr , William E ^a   Basolo, Alexandra L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTAGONISM; COMPETITION (ECOLOGY); EVOLUTION; INTRASEXUAL INTERACTION; MATE CHOICE; MATING SUCCESS; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY; SIGNALING; SPERM COMPETITION;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 43749090188     PISSN: 01791613     EISSN: 14390310     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2008.01511.x     Document Type: Review

References (142)

1. Alexander, R. D. Borgia, G. 1979 : On the origin and basis of the male-female phenomenon. In : Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects (Blum, M. S. Blum, N. A., eds). Academic Press, New York, pp. 417 440.
2. Andersson, M. 1994 : Sexual Selection. Princeton Univ Press, Princeton, NJ.
3. Andrade, M. C. B. 1996 : Sexual selection for male sacrifice in the Australia redback spider. Science 271, 70 72.
4. Arnqvist, G. Nilsson, T. 2000 : The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects. Anim. Behav. 60, 145 164.
5. Arnqvist, G. Rowe, L. 2002 : Antagonistic coevolution between the sexes in a group of insects. Nature 415, 787 789.
6. Arnqvist, G. Rowe, L. 2005 : Sexual Conflict. Princeton Univ Press, Princeton, NJ.
7. Bakker, T. C. Milinski, M. 1991 : Sequential female choice and the previous male effect in sticklebacks. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 29, 205 210.
8. Bakker, T. C., Künzler, R. Mazzi, D. 1999 : Condition-related mate choice in sticklebacks. Nature 401, 234.
9. Basolo, A. L. 1990 : Female preference predates the evolution of the sword in swordtail fish. Science 250, 808 810.
10. Bateman, A. J. 1948 : Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2, 349 368.
11. Bergstrom, C. Lachman, M. 2001 : Alarm calls as costly signals of antipredator vigilance: the watchful babbler game. Anim. Behav. 61, 535 543.
12. Birkhead, T. R. Møller, A. P. 1998 : Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection. Academic Press, San Diego.
13. Boggs, C. L. 1995 : Male nuptial gifts: phenotypic consequences and evolutionary implications. In : Insect Reproduction (Leather, S. R. Hardie, J., eds). CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 214 242.
14. Brown, W. D. 1997 : Courtship feeding in tree crickets increases insemination and female reproductive life span. Anim. Behav. 54, 1369 1382.
15. Brown, W. D., Crespi, B. J. Choe, J. C. 1997 : Sexual conflict and the evolution of mating systems. In : The Evolution of Mating Systems in Insects and Arachnids (Choe, J. C. Crespi, B. J., eds). Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, pp. 352 377.
16. Burley, N. 1986 : Sexual selection for aesthetic traits in species with biparental care. Am. Nat. 127, 415 445.
17. Burpee, D. M. Sakaluk, S. K. 1993 : Repeated matings offset costs of reproduction in female crickets. Evol. Ecol. 7, 240 250.
18. Bussière, L. F. 2002 : A model of the interaction between 'good genes' and direct benefits in courtship-feeding animals: when do males of high genetic quality invest less? Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 357, 309 317.
19. Bussière, L. F., Basit, H. A. Gwynne, D. T. 2005 : Preferred males are not always good providers: female choice and male investment in tree crickets. Behav. Ecol. 16, 223 231.
20. Cameron, E., Day, T. Rowe, L. 2007 : Sperm competition and the evolution of ejaculate composition. Am. Nat. 169, e159 e172.
21. Chapman, T., Liddle, L. F., Kalb, J. M., Wolfner, M. F. Partridge, L. 1995 : Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory gland products. Nature 373, 241 244.
22. Chapman, T., Arnqvist, G., Bangham, J. B. Rowe, L. 2003 : Sexual conflict. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18, 41 47.
23. Clutton-Brock, T. H. Parker, G. A. 1995 : Punishment in animal societies. Nature 373, 209 216.
24. Coleman, S. W., Patricelli, G. L. Borgia, G. 2004 : Variable female preferences drive complex male displays. Nature 428, 742 745.
25. Cotton, S., Fowler, K. Pomiankowski, A. 2004 : Do sexual ornaments demonstrate heightened condition-dependent expression as predicted by the handicap hypothesis? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 271, 771 783.
26. Cratsley, C. K. Lewis, S. M. 2003 : Female preference for male courtship flashes in Photinus ignitus fireflies. Behav. Ecol. 14, 135 140.
27. David, P., Bjorksten, T., Fowler, K. Pomiankowski, A. 2000 : Condition-dependent signalling of genetic variation in stalk-eyed flies. Nature 406, 186 188.
28. Davies, N. B. Halliday, T. R. 1978 : Deep croaks and fighting assessment in toads Bufo bufo. Nature 274, 683 685.
29. Dawkins, R. 1976 : The Selfish Gene. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
30. Dawkins, R. Carlisle, T. R. 1976 : Parental investment, mate desertion and a fallacy. Nature 262, 131 133.
31. Dominey, W. J. 1984 : Alternative mating tactics and evolutionarily stable strategies. Am. Zool. 24, 385 396.
32. Downhower, J. F. Lank, D. B. 1994 : Effects of previous experience on mate choice by female mottled sculpins. Anim. Behav. 47, 369 372.
33. Dugatkin, L. A. Godin, J.-G. J. 1993 : Female mate copying in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata): age-dependent effects. Behav. Ecol. 4, 289 292.
34. Dussourd, D. E., Harvis, C. A., Meinwald, J. Eisner, T. 1991 : Pheromonal advertisement of a nuptial gift by a male moth (Utethesia ornatrix). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 88, 9224 9227.
35. Eberhard, W. G. 1996 : Female Control: Sexual Selection by Cryptic Female Choice. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
36. Eberhard, W. G. 1998 : Female roles in sperm competition. In : Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection (Birkhead, T. R. Møller, A. P., eds). Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 91 116.
37. Endler, J. A. Basolo, A. L. 1998 : Sensory ecology, receiver biases and sexual selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13, 415 420.
38. Engqvist, L. 2007 : Nuptial gift consumption influences female remating in a scorpionfly: male or female control of mating rate? Evol. Ecol. 21, 49 61.
39. Enquist, M. 1985 : Communication during aggressive interactions with particular reference to variation in choice of behaviour. Anim. Behav. 33, 1152 1161.
40. Fedorka, K. M. Mousseau, T. A. 2004 : Female mating bias results in conflicting sex-specific offspring fitness. Nature 429, 65 67.
41. Forsgren, E. 1992 : Predation risk affects mate choice in a gobiid fish. Am. Nat. 140, 1041 1049.
42. Fowler, K. Partridge, L. 1989 : A cost of mating in female fruitflies. Nature 338, 760 761.
43. Gavrilets, S. Hayashi, T. I. 2006 : The dynamics of two- and three-way sexual conflicts over mating. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 361, 345 354.
44. Gavrilets, S., Arnqvist, G. Friberg, U. 2001 : The evolution of female mate choice by sexual conflict. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 268, 531 539.
45. Getty, T. 1998 : Reliable signaling need not be a handicap. Anim. Behav. 56, 253 255.
46. Getty, T. 2002 : Signaling health versus parasites. Am. Nat. 159, 363 371.
47. Gintis, H. 2000 : Strong reciprocity and human society. J. Theor. Biol. 206, 169 179.
48. Godfray, H. C. Johnstone, R. A. 2000 : Begging and bleating: the evolution of parent-offspring signaling. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 355, 1581 1591.
49. Godin, J.-G. J. Briggs, S. E. 1996 : Female mate choice under predation risk in the guppy. Anim. Behav. 51, 117 130.
50. Gong, A. Gibson, R. M. 1996 : Reversal of a female preference after visual exposure to a predator in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Anim. Behav. 52, 1007 1015.
51. Gowaty, P. A. 1985 : Multiple parentage and apparent monogamy in birds. Ornithol. Monogr. 37, 11 17.
52. Grafen, A. 1990 : Biological signals as handicaps. J. Theor. Biol. 144, 517 546.
53. Gray, D. A. Cade, W. H. 1999 : Sex, death and genetic variation: natural and sexual selection on cricket songs. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 266, 707 709.
54. Gwynne, D. T. 1988a : Courtship feeding and the fitness of female katydids (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). Evolution 42, 545 555.
55. Gwynne, D. T. 1988b : Courtship feeding in katydids benefits the mating male's offspring. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 23, 373 377.
56. Gwynne, D. T. 1990 : Testing parental investment and the control of sexual selection in katydids: the operational sex ratio. Am. Nat. 136, 474 484.
57. Head, M. L., Hunt, J., Jennions, M. D. Brooks, R. 2005 : The indirect benefits of mating with attractive males outweigh the direct costs. PLoS 3, e33. doi :.
58. Hebets, E. A. 2003 : Subadult experience influences adult mate choice in an arthropod: exposed female wolf spiders prefer males of a familiar phenotype. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 13390 13395.
59. Hedrick, A. V. Dill, L. M. 1992 : Mate choice by female crickets is influenced by predation risk. Anim. Behav. 46, 193 196.
60. Helfenstein, F., Wagner, R. H., Danchin, E. Rossi, J.-M. 2003 : Functions of courtship feeding in black-legged kittiwakes: natural and sexual selection. Anim. Behav. 65, 1027 1033.
61. Henson, S. A. Warner, R. R. 1997 : Male and female alternative reproductive behaviors in fishes: a new approach using intersexual dynamics. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28, 571 592.
62. Hicks, S. K., Hagenbuch, K. L. Meffert, L. M. 2004 : Variable costs of mating, longevity, and starvation resistance in Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae). Env. Ent. 33, 779 786.
63. Hill, G. E. 1991 : Plumage coloration is a sexually selected indicator of male quality. Nature 350, 337 339.
64. Hingle, A., Fowler, K. Pomiankowski, A. 2001 : The effect of transient food stress on female mate preference in the stalk-eyed fly Cyrtodiopsis dalmanni. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 268, 1239 1244.
65. Holland, B. Rice, W. R. 1998 : Chase-away sexual selection: antagonistic seduction versus resistance. Evolution 52, 1 7.
66. Holland, B. Rice, W. R. 1999 : Experimental removal of sexual selection reverses intersexual antagonistic coevolution and removes a reproductive load. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 5083 5088.
67. Hunt, J., Brook, R. Jennions, M. D. 2005 : Female mate choice as a condition-dependent life-history trait. Am. Nat. 166, 79 92.
68. Hunter, F. M., Petrie, M., Otronen, M., Birkhead, T. R. Møller, A. P. 1993 : Why do females copulate repeatedly with one male? Trends Ecol. Evol. 8, 21 26.
69. Jennions, M. D. Petrie, M. 1997 : Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences. Biol. Rev. 72, 283 327.
70. Jia, F.-Y., Greenfield, M. D. Collins, R. D. 2000 : Genetic variance of sexually selected traits in waxmoths: maintenance by genotype x environment interaction. Evolution 54, 953 967.
71. Johnson, J. B. Basolo, A. L. 2003 : Predator exposure alters female mate choice in the green swordtail. Behav. Ecol. 14, 619 625.
72. Johnson, J. C., Ivy, T. M. Sakaluk, S. K. 1999 : Female remating propensity contingent on sexual cannibalism in sagebrush crickets, Cyphoderris strepitans: a mechanism of cryptic female choice. Behav. Ecol. 10, 227 233.
73. Johnstone, R. A. 1997 : The evolution of animal signals. In : Behavioural Ecology (Krebs, J. R. Davies, N. B., eds). Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 155 178.
74. Kim, T. W., Christy, J. H. Choe, J. C. 2007 : A preference for a sexual signal keeps females safe. PLoS ONE 2, e422. doi :.
75. Knapp, R. A. Kovach, J. T. 1991 : Courtship as an honest indicator of male parental quality in the bicolor damselfish, Stegastes partitus. Behav. Ecol. 2, 295 300.
76. Kokko, H. 1998 : Should advertising of parental care be honest? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 265, 1871 1878.
77. Kotiaho, J. S. 2001 : Costs of sexual traits: a mismatch between theoretical considerations and empirical evidence. Biol. Rev. 76, 365 376.
78. Kvarnemo, C. 2006 : Evolution of maintenance of male care: is increased paternity a neglected benefit of care? Behav. Ecol. 17, 144 148.
79. Lindén, M. 1991 : Divorce in great tits - chance or choice? An experimental approach. Am. Nat. 138, 1039 1048.
80. Luttbeg, B. 2004 : Female mate assessment and choice behavior affect the frequency of alternative male mating tactics. Behav. Ecol. 15, 239 247.
81. Martin, O. Y. Hosken, D. J. 2003 : The evolution of reproductive isolation through sexual conflict. Nature 423, 979 982.
82. Maynard Smith, J. Harper, D. 2003 : Animal Signals. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
83. McGraw, L. A., Gibson, G., Clark, A. G. Wolfner, M. A. 2004 : Genes regulated by mating, sperm, or seminal fluid proteins in mated female Drosophila melanogaster. Curr. Biol. 14, 1509 1514.
84. Michod, R E. Hasson, O. 1990 : On the evolution of reliable indicators of fitness. Am. Nat. 135, 788 808.
85. Møller, A.P. de Lope, F. 1994 : Differential costs of a secondary sexual character: an experimental test of the handicap principle. Evolution 48, 1676 1683.
86. Moore, A. J. Pizzari, T. 2005 : Quantitative genetic models of sexual conflict based on interacting phenotypes. Am. Nat. 165, s88 s97.
87. Morrow, E. H., Arnqvist, G. Pitnick, S. 2003 : Adaptation versus pleiotropy: why do males harm their mates? Behav. Ecol. 14, 802 806.
88. Nilsson, T., Fricke, C. Arnqvist, G. 2002 : Patterns of divergence in the effects of mating on female reproductive performance in flour beetles. Evolution 56, 111 120.
89. Nur, N. Hasson, O. 1984 : Phenotypic plasticity and the handicap principle. J. Theor. Biol. 110, 275 297.
90. Pampoulie, C., Lindström, K. St. Mary, C. M. 2004 : Have your cake and eat it too: male sand gobies show more parental care in the presence of female partners. Behav. Ecol. 15, 199 204.
91. Parker, G. A. 1979 : Sexual selection and sexual conflict. In : Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects (Blum, M. S. Blum, N. A., eds). Academic Press, New York, pp. 123 166.
92. Parker, G. A. 2006 : Sexual conflict over mating and fertilization: an overview. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. B. 361, 235 259.
93. Pitnick, S., Brown, W. D. Miller, G. T. 2001 : Evolution of female remating behaviour following experimental removal of sexual selection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 268, 557 563.
94. Price, T., Schluter, D. Heckman, N. E. 1993 : Sexual selection when the female directly benefits. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 48, 187 211.
95. Reynolds, J. D. 1996 : Animal breeding systems. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11, 68 72.
96. Reynolds, J. D. Gross, M. R. 1990 : Costs and benefits of female mate choice: is there a lek paradox? Am. Nat. 136, 230 243.
97. Rice, W. R. 1996 : Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution. Nature 381, 232 234.
98. Rice, W. R. Holland, B. 1997 : The enemies within: intergenomic conflict, interlocus contest evolution (ICE), and the intraspecific Red Queen. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 41, 1 10.
99. Ridley, M. 1988 : Mating frequency and fecundity in insects. Biol. Rev. 63, 509 549.
100. Rooney, J. Lewis, S. M. 2002 : Fitness advantage from nuptial gifts in female fireflies. Ecol. Entomol. 27, 373 377.
101. Rosenqvist, G. Johansson, K. 1995 : Male avoidance of parasitized females explained by direct benefits in a pipefish. Anim. Behav. 49, 1039 1045.
102. Rowe, L. 1994 : The costs of mating and mate choice in water striders. Anim. Behav. 48, 1049 1056.
103. Rowe, L. Houle, D. 1996 : The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition dependent traits. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 263, 1415 1421.
104. Ryan, M. J. 1990 : Signals, species, and sexual selection. Oxford Surv. Evol. Biol. 7, 157 195.
105. Sakaluk, S. K. 1984 : Male crickets feed females to ensure complete sperm transfer. Science 223, 609 610.
106. Sakaluk, S. K. 1986 : Sperm competition and the evolution of nuptial feeding behavior in the cricket, Gryllodes supplicans (Walker). Evolution 40, 584 593.
107. Sakaluk, S. K. Eggert, A.-K. 1996 : Female control of sperm transfer and intraspecific variation in sperm precedence: antecedents to the evolution of a courtship food gift. Evolution 50, 694 703.
108. Sakaluk, S. K., Schaus, J. M., Eggert, A.-K., Snedden, W. A. Brady, P. L. 2002 : Polyandry and fitness of offspring reared under varying nutritional stress in decorated crickets. Evolution 56, 1999 2007.
109. Searcy, W. A. 1982 : The evolutionary effects of mate selection. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 13, 57 85.
110. Searcy, W. A. Nowicki, S. 2005 : The Evolution of Animal Communication: Reliability and Deception in Signaling Systems. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
111. Shuster, S. M. Wade, M. J. 2003 : Mating Systems and Strategies. Princeton Univ Press, Princeton, NJ.
112. Simmons, L. W. 2001 : Sperm Competition and its Evolutionary Consequences in the Insects. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
113. Simmons, L. W. Achmann, R. 2000 : Microsatellite analysis of sperm-use patterns in the bushcricket Requena verticalis. Evolution 54, 942 952.
114. Simmons, L. W. Bailey, W. J. 1990 : Resource influenced sex roles of zaprochiline tettigoniids (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). Evolution 44, 1853 1868.
115. Simmons, L. W. Gwynne, D. T. 1991 : The refractory period of female katydids (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae): sexual conflict over the re-mating interval? Behav. Ecol. 2, 276 282.
116. Simmons, L. W. Parker, G. A. 1989 : Nuptial feeding in insects: mating effort versus paternal investment. Ethology 81, 332 343.
117. Simmons, L. W. Siva-Jothy, M. T. 1998 : Sperm competition in insects: mechanisms and the potential for selection. In : Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection (Birkhead, T. R. Møller, A. P., eds). Academic Press, London, pp. 341 434.
118. Snedden, W. A. Greenfield, M. D. 1998 : Females prefer leading males: relative call timing and sexual selection in katydid choruses. Anim. Behav. 56, 1091 1098.
119. Stearns, S. C. 1976 : Life-history tactics: a review of the ideas. Q. Rev. Biol. 51, 3 47.
120. Stockley, P. 1997 : Sexual conflict resulting from adaptations to sperm competition. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12, 154 159.
121. Thornhill, R. 1976 : Sexual selection and nuptial feeding behavior in Bittacus apicalis (Insecta: Mecoptera). Am. Nat. 110, 529 548.
122. Thornhill, R. 1983 : Cryptic female choice and its implications in the scorpionfly Harpobitacus nigriceps. Am. Nat. 122, 765 788.
123. Thornhill, R. Alcock, J. 1983 : The Evolution of Insect Mating Systems. Harvard Univ. Press, Harvard.
124. Tregenza, T. Wedell, N. 1998 : Benefits of multiple mates in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. Evolution 52, 1726 1730.
125. Trivers, R. L. 1972 : Parental investment and sexual selection. In : Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, 1871-1971 (Campbell, B., ed). Aldine-Atherton, Chicago, pp. 136 179.
126. Vahed, K. 1998 : The function of nuptial feeding in insects: a review of empirical studies. Biol. Rev. 73, 43 78.
127. Vahed, K. 2007 : All that glisters is not gold: sensory bias, sexual conflict and nuptial feeding in insects and spiders. Ethology 113, 105 127.
128. Wagner, W. E. Jr. Harper, C. J. 2003 : Female life span and fertility are increased by the ejaculates of preferred males. Evolution 57, 2054 2066.
129. Wagner, W. E. Jr., Kelley, R. J., Tucker, K. R. Harper, C. J. 2001a : Females receive a life-span benefit from male ejaculates in a field cricket. Evolution 55, 994 1001.
130. Wagner, W. E. Jr., Smeds, M. R. Wiegmann, D. D. 2001b : Experience affects female responses to male song in the variable field cricket Gryllus lineaticeps (Orthoptera, Gryllidae). Ethology 107, 769 776.
131. Wagner, W. E. Jr., Smith, A. R. Basolo, A. L. 2007 : False promises: females spurn cheating males in a field cricket. Biol. Lett. 3, 379 381.
132. Wedell, N. 1991 : Sperm competition select for nuptial feeding in a bushcricket. Evolution 45, 1975 1978.
133. Wedell, N. 1994 : Dual function of the bushcricket spermatophore. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 258, 181 185.
134. Wedell, N. 1996 : Mate quality affects reproductive effort in a paternally investing species. Am. Nat. 148, 1075 1088.
135. Wedell, N. Arak, A. 1989 : The wartbiter spermatophore and its effect on female reproductive output (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae, Decticus verrucivorus). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 24, 117 125.
136. Wedell, N., Kvarnemo, C., Lessels, C. M. Tregenza, T. 2006 : Sexual conflict and life histories. Anim. Behav. 71, 999 1011.
137. Weigensberg, I., Carriere, Y. Roff, D. A. 1998 : Effects of male genetic contribution and paternal investment to egg and hatchling size in the cricket, Gryllus firmus. J. Evol. Biol. 11, 135 146.
138. Westneat, D. F. Sargent, R. C. 1996 : Sex and parenting - the effects of sexual conflict and parentage on paternal strategies. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11, 87 91.
139. Westneat, D. F., Sherman, P. W. Morton, M. L. 1990 : The ecology and evolution of extra-pair copulations in birds. In : Current Ornithology, Volume 7 (Power, D. M., ed). Plenum Press, New York, pp. 331 369.
140. Wolff, J. O. Macdonald, D. W. 2004 : Promiscuous females defend their offspring. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19, 127 134.
141. Zahavi, A. 1975 : Mate selection: a selection for a handicap. J. Theor. Biol. 53, 205 214.
142. Zeh, J. A. Zeh, D. W. 2003 : Toward a new sexual selection paradigm: polyandry, conflict and incompatibility. Ethology 109, 929 950.