Conventional high pressure versus newly developed continuous-flow ureterorenoscope: Urodynamic pressure evaluation of the renal pelvis and flow capacity

Journal of Endourology

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 1083-1085

  Michel, Maurice Stephan ^a   Honeck, Patrick ^a   Alken, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DEVICE; EX VIVO STUDY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY PELVIS; KIDNEY TUBULE PRESSURE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SWINE; URETERORENOSCOPE; URINE FLOW RATE; URODYNAMICS;

ANIMALS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; IRRIGATION; KIDNEY PELVIS; MATERIALS TESTING; MODELS, ANIMAL; PRESSURE; SWINE; URETEROSCOPES; URETEROSCOPY;

EID: 43749086851     PISSN: 08927790     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/end.2008.0016     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Blew BD, Dagnone AJ, Pace KT, Honey RJ. Comparison of Peditrol irrigation device and common methods of irrigation. J Endourol 2005;19:562-565.
2. Bagley DH. Flexible ureteroscopy. Semin Urol 1989;7:7-15.
3. Wilson WT, Preminger GM. Intrarenal pressures generated during flexible deflectable ureterorenoscopy. J Endourol 1990;4:135.
4. Cadeddu JA, Chen R, Bishoff J, Micali S, Kumar A, Moore RG, Kavoussi LR. Clinical significance of fever after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urology 1998;52:48-50.
5. Schwalb DM, Eshghi M, Davidian M, Franco I. Morphological and physiological changes in the urinary tract associated with ureteral dilation and ureteropyeloscopy: An experimental study. J Urol 1993;149:1576-1585.
6. Dogan HS, Sahin A, Cetinkaya Y, Akdogan B, Ozden E, Kendi S. Antibiotic prophylaxis in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Prospective study in 81 patients. J Endourol. 2002;16:649-653.
7. Hinman F, Redewill FH. Pyelovenous back flow. JAMA 1926;87:1287.