Evaluation of a decision support training effectiveness measure

Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 22-36

  Bohler, Jeffrey ^a   Hall, Dianne ^a  

^a AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Decision; Effectiveness; Support; Training

Indexed keywords

EID: 43749083508     PISSN: 08250383     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cjas.51     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Arnott, D., & Pervan, G. (2005). A critical analysis of decision support systems research. Journal of Information Technology, 20(2), 67-87.
2. Benbasat, I., & Konsynski, B. (1988). Introduction to Special Section on GDSS. MIS Quarterly, 12(A), 588.
3. Benbasat, I., & Zmud, R.W. (1999). Empirical research in information systems: The practice of relevance. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 3.
4. Borich, G.D. (1996). Effective teaching methods. Columbus, OH: Prentice-Hall Inc.
5. Brunswik, E. (1955). Representative design and probabilistic theory in a functional psychology. Psychological Review, 62(3), 193-217.
6. Carroll, J.S., & Johnson, E.J. (1990). Decision research: a field guide (Vol. 22). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
7. Courtney, J.F. (2001). Decision making and knowledge management in inquiring organizations: toward a new decision-making paradigm for DSS. Decision Support Systems, 57(1), 17-38.
8. Cyert, R.M., Simon, H.A., & Trow, D.B. (1956). Observation of a Business Decision. The Journal of Business, 29(A), 237-248.
9. Dennis, A.R., & Valacich, J.S. (1994). Group, Sub-Group, and Nominal Group Idea Generation: New Rules for a New Media? Journal of Management, 20(A), 723-736.
10. DeSanctis, G., & Gallupe, R.B. (1987). A Foundation For The Study Of Group Decision Support Systems. Management Science, 33(5), 589.
11. Dickson, G.W., Partridge, J.-E.L., & Robinson, L.H. (1993). Exploring Modes of Facultative Support for GDSS Technology. MIS Quarterly, 17(2), 173.
12. Fjermestad, J., & Hiltz, S.R. (1998). An Assessment of Group Support Systems Experimental Research: Methodology and Results. Journal of Management Information Systems, 15(3), 7.
13. Fjermestad, J. (1998). An integrated framework for group support systems. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 8(2), 83-107.
14. Fjermestad, J., & Hiltz, S.R. (1998). An Assessment of Group Support Systems Experimental Research: Methodology and Results. Journal of Management Information Systems, 15(3), 7.
15. Gadman, S., & Cooper, C. (2005). Strategies for collaborating in an interdependent impermanent world. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 26(1), 23-34.
16. Griffith, T.L., Fuller, M.A., & Northcraft, G.B. (1998). Facilitator influence in group support systems: Intended and unintended effects. Information Systems Research, 9(1), 20-36.
17. Hall, D., & Davis, R. (2007). Engaging Multiple Perspectives: A Value-based Decision-making Model. Decision Support Systems, 43(4), 1588-1604.
18. Hall, D., & Paradice, D. (2007). Do you do as you value? Investigating Value-Based Decision Bias and Mediation. Communications of the ACM, 50(4), 81-85.
19. Hiltz, S.R., Dufner, D., Holmes, M., & Poole, S. (1991). Distributed group support systems: Social dynamics and design dilemmas. Journal of Organizational Computing, 2(1), 135-159.
20. Hoch, S.J., & Schkade, D.A. (1996). A Psychological Approach to Decision Support Systems. Management Science, 42(1), 51-64.
21. Holsapple, C.W., & Whinston, A.B. (1996). Decision Support Systems: A Knowledge-Based Approach. Minneapolis/St. Paul: West Publishing Company.
22. Kilmann, R.H., & Kyung-Il, G. (1976). The MAPS Design Technology: Designing Strategic Intelligence Systems for MNCs. Columbia Journal of World Business, 11(2), 35.
23. Kirkpatrick, D.L. (1998). Evaluating Training Programs: the four levels. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
24. Kleinmuntz, D.N. (1985). Cognitive Heuristics and Feedback in a Dynamic Decision Environment. Management Science, 31(6), 680.
25. Kutz, G.D., & Hite, R.C. (2004). Department of Defense: Further Actions Needed to Establish and Implement a Framework for Successful Business Transformation: GAO-04-626T. GAO Reports, 1.
26. Lilien, G.L., Rangaswamy, A., Van Bruggen, G.H., & Starke, K. (2004). DSS Effectiveness in Marketing Resource Allocation Decisions: Reality vs. Perception. Information Systems Research, 15(3), 216.
27. Molenda, M., & Bichelmeyer, B. (2005). Issues and trends in instructional technology: Slow growth as economy recovers. Educational Media and Technology Yearbook 2005, 3-28.
28. Sharda, R., Barr, S.H., & McDonnell, J.C. (1988). Decision Support System Effectiveness: A Review and an Empirical Test. Management Science, 34(2), 139.
29. Sheskin, D.J. (1997). Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press: Inc.
30. Siegel, S. (1957). Nonparametric Statistics. The American Statistician, 11(3), 13-19.
31. Simon, H.A. (1955). A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99.
32. Skraba, A., Kljajiç, M., Leskovar, R., & Bernik, I. (2001). The Impact of Information Feedback on Group Decision Making When Applying System Dynamics Models. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society.
33. Turoff, M., Hiltz, S.R., Bahgat, A.N.F., & Rana, A.R. (1993). Distributed Group Support Systems. MIS Quarterly, 17(A), 399-417.
34. Veit, B. (2005, Fall 2005). Department of the Navy Converged Enterprise Resource Planning Program. Armed Forces Comptroller, 11-15.
35. Watson, R.T. (1987). A study of group decision support system use in three and four-person groups for a preference allocation decision. University of Minnesota.
36. Women in the Labor Force: A Databook. (2005). In U. S. D. o. Labor (Ed.) (Vol. 985, pp. 88): Bureau of Labor Statistics.
37. Zigurs, I., & Buckland, B.K. (1998). A Theory of Task/Technology Fit and Group Support Systems Effectiveness. MIS Quarterly, 22(3), 313.
38. Zinkhan, G.M., Joachimsthaler, E.A., & Kinnear, T.C. (1987). Individual Differences and Marketing Decision Support System Usage and Satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research (JMR), 24(2), 208.