Assessment of global right ventricular function on 64-MDCT compared with MRI

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 190, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 1358-1361

  Plumhans, Cédric ^a   Mühlenbruch, Georg ^a   Rapaee, Annuar ^b   Sim, Kui Hian ^b   Seyfarth, Tobias ^c   Günther, Rolf W ^a   Mahnken, Andreas H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL RWTH AACHEN   (Germany)

^b SARAWAK GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Malaysia)

^c SIEMENS AG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cardiac imaging; Heart disease; MDCT; MRI; Right ventricular function

Indexed keywords

IOPROMIDE;

ADULT; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; ELECTROCARDIOGRAM; FEMALE; HEART HEMODYNAMICS; HEART RIGHT VENTRICLE FUNCTION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

CONTRAST MEDIA; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IOHEXOL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, CINE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STROKE VOLUME; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; VENTRICULAR FUNCTION, RIGHT;

EID: 43649101435     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.07.3022     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Ohnesorge B, Flohr T, Becker C, et al. Cardiac imaging by means of electrocardiographically gated multisection spiral CT: initial experience. Radiology 2000; 217:564-571
2. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, van Mieghem CA, et al. High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation 2005; 112:2318-2323
3. Mühlenbruch G, Mahnken AH, Das M, et al. Evaluation of aortocoronary bypass stents with cardiac MDCT compared with conventional catheter angiography. AJR 2007; 188:361-369
4. Nikolaou K, Rist C, Wintersperger BJ, et al. Clinical value of MDCT in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease in patients with a low pretest likelihood of significant disease. AJR 2006; 186:1659-1668
5. Juergens KU, Fischbach R. Left ventricular function studied with MDCT. Eur Radiol 2006; 16:342-357
6. Mahnken AH, Koos R, Spuentrup E, et al. Sixteen-slice spiral CT versus MR imaging for assessment of left ventricular function in acute myocardial infarction. Eur Radiol 2005; 15:714-720
7. Juergens KU, Grude M, Fallenberg EM, et al. Using ECG-gated multidetector CT to evaluate global left ventricular function in patients with coronary artery disease. AJR 2002; 179:1545-1550
8. Dewey M, Muller M, Eddicks S, et al. Evaluation of global and regional left ventricular function with 16-slice computed tomography, biplane cineventriculography, and two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48:2034-2044
9. Mahnken AH, Katoh M, Bruners P, et al. Acute myocardial infarction: assessment of left ventricular function with 16-detector row spiral CT versus MR imaging - study in pigs. Radiology 2005; 236:112-117
10. Oldershaw P. Assessment of right ventricular function and its role in clinical practice. Br Heart J 1992; 68:12-15
11. Coche E, Vlassenbroek A, Roelants V, et al. Evaluation of biventricular ejection fraction with ECG-gated 16-slice CT: preliminary findings in acute pulmonary embolism in comparison with radionuclide ventriculography. Eur Radiol 2005; 15:1432-1440
12. Koch K, Oellig F, Oberholzer K, et al. Assessment of right ventricular function by 16-detector-row CT: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 2005; 15:312-318
13. Raman SV, Shah M, McCarthy B, et al. Multidetector row cardiac computed tomography accurately quantifies right and left ventricular size and function compared with cardiac magnetic resonance. Am Heart J 2006; 151:736-744
14. Dogan H, Kroft LJ, Huisman MV, et al. Right ventricular function in patients with acute pulmonary embolism: analysis with electrocardiography- synchronized multi-detector row CT. Radiology 2007; 242:78-84
15. Doǧan H, Kroft LJ, Bax JJ, et al. MDCT assessment of right ventricular function. AJR 2006; 186[6 suppl 2]:S366-S370
16. Raman SV, Shah M, McCarthy B, Garcia A, Ferketich AK. Multi-detector row cardiac computed tomography accurately quantifies right and left ventricular size and function compared with cardiac magnetic resonance. Am Heart J 2006; 151:736-744
17. Miller S, Simonetti OP, Carr J, et al. MR imaging of the heart with cine true fast imaging with steady-state precession: influence of spatial and temporal resolution on left ventricular functional parameters. Radiology 2002; 223:263-269
18. Rerkpattanapipat O, Mazur W, Link KM, et al. Assessment of cardiac function with MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2003; 11:67-80
19. Bellenger NG, Burgess MI, Ray SG, et al. Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes in heart failure by echocardiography, radionuclide ventriculography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance: are they interchangeable? Eur Heart J 2000; 21:1387-1396
20. Stamm G, Nagel HD. CT Expo: a novel program for dose evaluation in CT [in German]. Rofo 2002; 174:1570-1576
21. Pennell DJ. Ventricular volume and mass by CMR. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2002; 4:507-513
22. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurements. Lancet 1986; 1:307-310
23. Larose E, Ganz P, Reynolds G, et al. Right ventricular dysfunction assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging predicts poor prognosis late after myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49:855-862
24. Numburi DU, Chatzimavroudis GP, Stillman AE, et al. Patient-specific contrast injection protocols for cardiovascular multidetector row computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2007; 31:281-289