Pathways to participatory research in developing a tool to measure feelings

British Journal of Learning Disabilities

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 128-133

  Brooks, Michelle ^a   Davies, Stephanie ^a  

^a Barnet Learning Disabilities Service   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Feelings; Outcome measure; Participatory research; Psychological therapy

Indexed keywords

EID: 43649084423     PISSN: 13544187     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-3156.2007.00476.x     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Beail N. & Warden S. (1996) Evaluation of a psychodynamic psychotherapy service for adults with intellectual disabilities: rational, design and preliminary outcome data. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil, 9: 223-8.
2. Beresford P. (2003) Its our lives: A short theory of knowledge, distance and experience. London, Citizen Press.
3. Boote J., Telford R. & Cooper C. (2002) Consumer involvement in health research: A review and research agenda. Health Policy, 61: 213-36.
4. Booth T. & Booth W. (2003) In the frame: Photovoice and mothers with learning difficulties. Disabil Soc, 18: 431-42.
5. Burke A., McMillan J., Cummins L., Thompson A., Forsyth W., et al. (2003) Setting up participatory research: A discussion of the initial stages. Br J Learn Disabil, 31: 65-9.
6. Chappell A.L. (2000) Emergence of participatory methodology in learning disability research: Understanding the context. Br J Learn Disabil, 28: 38-43.
7. Department of Health (2000) The NHS Plan. London, The Stationary Office.
8. Department of Health (2001) Valuing People: A new strategy for learning disability for the 21st century. London, The Stationary Office. Cm 5086.
9. Department of Health and Social Security (1990) NHS and Community Care Act. London, The Stationary Office.
10. Dye L., Hendy S., Hare D.J. & Burton M. (2004) Capacity to consent to participate in research - a recontextualization. Br J Learn Disabil, 32: 144-50.
11. Evans C., Mellor-Clark J., Margison F., Barkham M., Audin K. et al. (2000) CORE: Clinical outcomes in routine evaluation. J Ment Health, 9: 247-55.
12. Evans C., Connell J., Barkham M., Margison F., McGrath G. et al. (2002) Towards a standardized brief outcome measure: Psychometric properties and utility of CORE-OM. Br J Psychiatry, 180: 51-60.
13. Gilbert T. (2004) Involving people with learning disabilities in research: Issues and possibilities. Health Soc Care Community, 12: 298-308.
14. Health and Social Care Information Centre (2003/2004) Adults with learning difficulties in England. London, HSCIC.
15. MacDonald J., Sinason V. & Hollins S. (2003) An interview study of people people with learning disabilities experience of, and satisfaction with, group analytic therapy Psychology and Psychotherapy. Theory, Research and Practice, 76: 433-53.
16. Marks D. (1999) Disability: Controversial debates and psychosocial perspectives: Oxford, Routledge.
17. Mellor-Clark J., Buckeridge S., McInnes B. & Jones C. (2004) Using CORE in therapeutic practice. Counc Psychother J, 15: 32-3.
18. Newman D.W., Kellett S. & Beail N. (2003) From research and development to practice-based evidence: Clinical governance initiatives in a service for adults with mild intellectual disabilities and mental health needs. J Intellect Disabil Res, 47: 68-74.
19. NICE Guidelines to improve the treatment and care of people with depression and anxiety (2004) National Institute for Clinical Excellence, London, UK.
20. Pattison S. (2005) Making a difference for young people with learning disabilities: A model for inclusive counselling practice. Counc Psychother Res, 5: 120-30.
21. Prout H.T. & Nowak-Drabik K.M. (2003) Psychotherapy with persons who have mental retardation: An evaluation of effectiveness. Am J Ment Retard, 108: 82-93.
22. Ramcharan P., Grant G. & Flynn M. (2004) Participatory and emancipatory research: How far have we come? In: Emerson E., Hatton C., Thompson T. and Parmenter T., editors. International Handbook of Applied Research in Intellectural Disabilities. London, Wiley: 83-111.
23. Roth A. & Fonagy P. (2005) What works for whom? A critical review of psychotherapy research. New York, The Guilford Press.
24. Simpson D. & Miller L. (eds) (2004) Unexpected gains - psychotherapy with people with learning disabilities. London, Karnac (Books) Ltd.
25. Smith J.A. (ed.) (2003) Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to methods. London, Sage.
26. Smyth M. & Williamson E. (eds) (2004) Researchers and their 'subjects': Ethics, power, knowledge and consent. Bristol, Policy Press.
27. Stalker K. (1998) Some ethical and methodological issues in research with people with learning difficulties. Disabil Soc, 13: 5-19.
28. The Royal College of Psychiatrists Report (2004) Psychotherapy and learning disability. The Royal College of Psychiatry Council Report CR116.
29. Tindle K. (2002) Use of the CORE system with students. Healthc Counc Psychother J, 2: 24-5.
30. Walmsley J. (2001) Normalisation, emancipatory research and inclusive research in learning disability. Disabil Soc, 16: 187-205.
31. Walmsley J. & Johnson K. (2003) Inclusive research with people with learning disabilities. Past, present and future. London, Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
32. Ward L. & Simons K. (1998) Practising partnership: Involving people with learning difficulties in research. Br J Learn Disabil, 26: 128-31.
33. Williams V. (1999) Researching together. Br J Learn Disabil, 27: 48-51.