Can treadmill walking be used to assess propulsion generation?

Journal of Biomechanics

Volumn 41, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 1805-1808

  Goldberg, Evan J ^a   Kautz, Steven A ^b,c   Neptune, Richard R ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^d The University of Texas at Austin   (United States)

Author keywords

Gait; Ground reaction forces; Hemiparetic; Propulsion

Indexed keywords

BIOMECHANICS; BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; GAIT ANALYSIS; IMPULSE RESPONSE; MOTION CONTROL;

GROUND REACTION FORCES; HEMIPARETIC; OVERGROUND WALKING; TREADMILL WALKING;

EXERCISE EQUIPMENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BODY WEIGHT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; GAIT; GROUND REACTION FORCE; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; MALE; POPULATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STANDING; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TREADMILL; TREADMILL EXERCISE; VELOCITY; WALKING;

ADULT; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; GAIT; HEMIPLEGIA; HUMANS; MALE; WALKING;

EID: 43549116080     PISSN: 00219290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.03.009     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Alton F., Baldey L., Caplan S., and Morrissey M.C. A kinematic comparison of overground and treadmill walking. Clinical Biomechanics (Bristol, Avon) 13 (1998) 434-440
2. Balasubramanian C.K., Bowden M.G., Neptune R.R., and Kautz S.A. Relationship between step length asymmetry and walking performance in subjects with chronic hemiparesis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 88 (2007) 43-49
3. Bayat R., Barbeau H., and Lamontagne A. Speed and temporal-distance adaptations during treadmill and overground walking following stroke. Neurorehabilitation Neural Repair 19 (2005) 115-124
4. Boda, W.L., Tapp, W., Findley, T.F., 1994. Biomechanical comparison of treadmill and overground walking. In: Eighth Biennial Conference, Canadian Society for Biomechanics, Calgary.
5. Bowden M.G., Balasubramanian C.K., Neptune R.R., and Kautz S.A. Anterior-posterior ground reaction forces as a measure of paretic leg contribution in hemiparetic walking. Stroke 37 (2006) 872-876
6. Gottschall J.S., and Kram R. Ground reaction forces during downhill and uphill running. Journal of Biomechanics 38 (2005) 445-452
7. Harris-Love M.L., Macko R.F., Whitall J., and Forrester L.W. Improved hemiparetic muscle activation in treadmill versus overground walking. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 18 (2004) 154-160
8. Masani K., Kouzaki M., and Fukunaga T. Variability of ground reaction forces during treadmill walking. Journal of Applied Physiology 92 (2002) 1885-1890
9. Murray M.P., Spurr G.B., Sepic S.B., Gardner G.M., and Mollinger L.A. Treadmill vs. floor walking: kinematics, electromyogram, and heart rate. Journal of Applied Physiology 59 (1985) 87-91
10. Riley P.O., Paolini G., Della Croce U., Paylo K.W., and Kerrigan D.C. A kinematic and kinetic comparison of overground and treadmill walking in healthy subjects. Gait and Posture 26 (2007) 17-24
11. Strathy G.M., Chao E.Y., and Laughman R.K. Changes in knee function associated with treadmill ambulation. Journal of Biomechanics 16 (1983) 517-522
12. Turns L.J., Neptune R.R., and Kautz S.A. Relationships between muscle activity and anterior-posterior ground reaction forces in hemiparetic walking. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 88 (2007) 1127-1135