A semantically-enhanced component-based architecture for software composition

Proceedings of the International Multi-Conference on Computing in the Global Information Technology, ICCGI'06

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages

  Gomez, Juan Miguel ^a   Han, Sung Kook ^b   Toma, Ioan ^c   Sapkota, Brahmananda ^d   Garcia Crespo, Angel ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD CARLOS III DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b Wonkwang University   (South Korea)

^c Semantic Technology Institute Innsbruck   (Austria)

^d Lower Dangan   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE REUSABILITY; DATA STRUCTURES; SEMANTIC WEB;

DYNAMIC APPLICATIONS; INFORMATION RESOURCES; INTEGRATION EFFORTS; SOFTWARE COMPONENTS;

SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE;

EID: 43549106579     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICCGI.2006.6     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Component-based software paradigm The Serverside.com, July 2002. http://www.theserverside.com
2. B. Benatallah, M-S. Hacid, C. Rey, and F. Toumani. Request rewriting-based web service discovery. In The Semantic Web - ISWC 2003, pp. 242-257, Oct. 2003.
3. Thatte. D. (Ed) Andrews T. Curbera, F., Goland, Y., Klein, J., Leyman, F., Soller, D., Thatte, S., Weerawarana, S , Business Process Execution Language for Web Services.May, 2004.
4. ebXML ebXML:Business Process and Business Information Analisys Overview. Ebxml Business Process Team. May 2004.
5. E. Christensen, F. Curbera, G. Meredith, S. Weerawarana. Web services description language (wsdl) 1.1, March 2001. http://www.w3.org/ TR/wsdl
6. O. Lassila, R.R. Swick (eds). Resource description framework (RDF) model and syntax specification. Rec. W3C, Feb. 1999. www.w3.org/ TR/1999/REC-rdf-syntax-19990222/
7. H. Lausen, D. Roman, U. Keller (eds). Web service modeling ontology -standard (WSMO-Standard). Working draft, Digital Enterprise Research Institute (DERI), March 2004. http://www.wsmo.org/2004/d2/ v0.2/
8. M. Zaremba, E. Oren, E. Cimpian (eds). Web service Execution Environment (WSMX). Working draft, Digital Enterprise Research Institute (DERI), March 2004. http://www.wsmo.org/2004/ d13/v0.2/
9. P.F. Patel-Schneider, P. Hayes, I. Horrocks. OWL web ontology language semantics and abstract syntax. W3C recommendation, W3C, February 2004.
10. W3C. Soap version 1.2 part 0: Primer, June 2003. http://www.w3. org/TR/2003/REC-soap12-part0-20030624/
11. R. Benjamins, D. Fensel Assumptions of problem-solving methods and their role in knowledge engineering Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on AI (ECAI'96).
12. T. Gruber A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specification Knowledge Acquisition, 1993.
13. Juan M. Gomez, M. Rico,F. Garcia,C. Bussler,. GODO: Goal driven orchestration for Semantic Web Services. Proceedings of the Workshop on WSMO Implementations (WIW 2004) Frankfurt, Germany, September 29-30, 2004 2004.