Underlying issues associated with validation and verification of dynamic data driven simulation

Proceedings - Winter Simulation Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 2093-2100

  Michopoulos, John G ^a   Lambrakos, Samuel G ^a  

^a NAVAL RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA CONTAINS; DATA SPACES; DATA-DRIVEN MODELING; DYNAMIC DATA; DYNAMIC DATA DRIVEN APPLICATION SYSTEMS (DDDAS); MODEL SPACES; OPTIMAL MODELING; PARAMETERIZATIONS; PARAMETRIC REPRESENTATIONS; SYSTEM RESPONSES; VALIDATION AND VERIFICATION;

LEAD;

EID: 43449138456     PISSN: 08917736     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/WSC.2006.322998     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. AIAA 1998. Standards program, guide for the verification and validation of computational fluid dynamics simulations. Technical Report AIAA report G-077-1998, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
2. ASME-JFE 1993. Journal of fluids engineering editorial policy statement on control or numerical accuracy. Jnl. of Fluids Engineering 115 (3): 339-340.
3. Bernard P. Zeigler, Tag Gon Kim, H. P. 2000. Theory of modeling and simulation. 2nd Edition ed. San Diego: Academic Press.
4. Darema, F. 2004. Dynamic data driven applications systems: A new paradigm for application simulations and measurements. In International Conference on Computational Science, ed. M. Bubak, G. D. van Albada, P. M. A. Sloot, and J. Dongarra, Volume 3038, 662-669: Springer-Verlag.
5. DoD. Verication, validation, and accredization (vv&a) recommended practices guide, defense modeling simulation office, office of the director of defense re- search and engr., available: www.dmso.mil/docslib.
6. Michopoulos, J. 2004, September 5-10. Mechatronically automated characterization of material constitutive respone. In Proceedings of the 6th World Congress on Computational Mechanics (WCCM-VI), 486-491. Beijing China: Tsinghua University Press and Springer.
7. Michopoulos, J., C. Farhat, E. N. Houstis, P. Tsompanopoulou, H. Zhang, and T. Gullaud. 2005. Dynamic data driven methodologies for multiphysics system modeling and simulation. See Sunderam, van Albada, Sloot, and Dongarra (2005), 616-623.
8. Michopoulos, J., and S. Lambrakos. 2005. On the fundamental tautology of validating data-driven models and simulations. See Sunderam, van Albada, Sloot, and Dongarra (2005), 738-745.
9. Michopoulos, J., P. Tsompanopoulou, E. Houstis, C. Farhat, M. Lesoinne, J. Rice, and A. Joshi. 2005, April. On a data-driven environment for multiphysics applications. Future Generation Computer Systems 21:953-968.
10. Michopoulos, J., P. Tsompanopoulou, E. Houstis, J. Rice, C. Farhat, M. Lesoinne, and F. Lechenault. 2003. Design architecture of a data driven environment for multiphysics applications. In ASME 2003 Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Chicago, Volume I668CD: ASME Press. Paper-No.:DETC2003/CIE-48268.
11. Pilch, M., T. Truncano, J. Moya, G. Froelich, A. Hodges, and D. Peercy. 2001, Jan.. Guidelines for sandia asei verification and validation plans - content and format. Technical Report SAN2000-3101, Sandia Reports.
12. Sunderam, V. S., G. D. van Albada, P. M. A. Sloot, and J. Dongarra. (Eds.) 2005. Computational science - iccs 2005, 5th international conference, atlanta, ga, usa, may 22-25, 2005, proceedings, part ii, Volume 3515 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer.
13. Tarantola, A. 2004. Inverse problem theory and methods for model parameter estimation. Philadelphia, PA, USA: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
14. Van Benthem, J. 1949. The logic of time. D. Reidel Publishing Company.