Accuracy in the estimation of food servings against the portions in food photographs

European Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Volumn 62, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 674-681

  Ovaskainen, M L ^a   Paturi, M ^a   Reinivuo, H ^a   Hannila, M L ^a   Sinkko, H ^a   Lehtisalo, J ^a   Pynnonen Polari O ^b   Mannisto S ^a  

^a NATIONAL PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

^b Kuntoutuskeskus Petrea   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; BREAD; CEREAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EDUCATION; FAST FOOD; FEMALE; FINLAND; FOOD INTAKE; FRUIT; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; PHOTOGRAPHY; PORTION SIZE; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SEX DIFFERENCE; VALIDATION STUDY; VALIDITY; VEGETABLE; VOLUNTEER;

ADULT; BODY MASS INDEX; DIET SURVEYS; ENERGY INTAKE; FEMALE; FOOD; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHOTOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEX DISTRIBUTION; SIZE PERCEPTION;

PETREA;

EID: 43449130935     PISSN: 09543007     EISSN: 14765640     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602758     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Anttolainen M, Javanainen J, Kaartinen P. Lahti-Koski M. Lauronen J, Männistö S et al. (1998). The 1997 dietary survey of Finnish adults. Publications of the National Public Health Institute B8/1998.
2. Ayala G (2006). An experimental evaluation of a group- versus computer-based intervention to improve food portion size estimation skills. Health Edu Res 21, 133-145.
3. Chambers E, Godwin S. Vecchio F (2000). Cognitive strategies for reporting portion sizes using dietary recall procedures. J Am Diet Assoc 100, 891-897.
4. Frobisher C, Maxwell S (2003). The estimation of food portion sizes: A comparison between using descriptions of portion sizes and a photographic food atlas by children and adults. J Hum Nutr and Diet 16, 181-188.
5. Geier A, Rozin P, Doros G (2006). Unit bias. A new heuristic that helps explain the effect of portion size on food intake. Psychol Sci 17, 521-525.
6. Haapa E. Toponen T, Pietinen P, Räsänen L (1985). Picture booklet of food portions (Annoskuvakirja). National Public Health Institute: Helsinki.
7. Hernández T, Wilder L, Kuehn D, Rubitzky K, Moser-Veillon P, Godwin S et al. (2006). Portion size estimation and expectation of accuracy. J Food Comp and Anal 19 (Suppl), S14-S21.
8. Hirvonen T, Männistö S, Roos E, Pietinen P (1997). Increasing prevalence of underreporting does noi necessarily distort dietary surveys. Eur J Clin Nutr 51, 297-301.
9. Karvetti R-L, Knuts L-R (1985). Validity of the 24-hour dietary recall. J Am Diet Assoc 85, 1437-1442.
10. Krebs-Smith S, Graubard B, Kahle L, Subar A, Cleveland L, Ballard-Barbash R (2000). Low energy reporters vs other: A comparison of reported food intakes. Eur J. Clin Nutr 54, 281-287.
11. KTL, National Public Health Institute (2005). The Finnish food composition database Fineli®, version 5, http://www.fineli.fi.
12. Lara J, Scott A, Lean M (2004). Intentional mis-reporting of food consumption and its relationship with body mass index and psychological score in worhen. J Hum Nutr Diet 17, 209-218.
13. Lucas F, Niravong M, Villeminot S, Kaaks R. Clavel-Chapelon F (1995). Estimation of food portions size using photographs: Validity, strengths, weaknesses and recommendations. J Hum Nutr Diet 8, 65-74.
14. Matthiessen J, Fagt S, Biltoft-Jensen A, Beck A, Ovesen L (2003). Size makes a difference. Public Health Nutr 6, 65-72.
15. Männistö S, Ovaskainen M-L, Valsta L (2003)1. The national FINDIET 2002 study. Publications of the National Public Health Institute B3 (in Finnish, with English tables, figures and summaries). http://www.ktl.fi/julkaisut/jutkaisusarja_b/2003b3.
16. Nelson M, Haraldsdottir J (1998). Food photographs: Practical guidelines I. Design and analysis of studies to validate portion size estimates. Public Health Nutr 1, 219-230.
17. Nielsen S, Popkin B (2003). Patterns and trends in food portion sizes, 1977-1998. J Am Med Assoc 289, 450-453.
18. Noethling U, Hoffmann K, Bergmann M, Boeing H (2003). Portion size adds limited information on variance in food intake of participants in the EPIC-Potsdam study. J Nutr 133, 510-515.
19. Pekkarinen M (1970). Methodology in the collection of food consumption data. World Rep Nutr Diet 12, 145-171.
20. Pletinen P, Hartman A, Haapa E, Räänen L, Haapakoski J, Palmgren J et al. (1988). Reproducibility and validity of dietary assessment instruments. I. A self-administered food use questionnaire with a portion size picture booklet. Am J Epidemiol 128, 655-666.
21. Slimani N, Deharveng G, Charrondière R, van Kappel. A, Ocké M, Welch A et al. (1999). Structure of the standardized computerized 24-h diet recall interview used as reference- method in the 22 centers participating in the EPIC project. Comp Meth Prog Biomed 58, 251-266.
22. Smith A (1991). Cognitive processes in long-term dietary recall. National Center for Health Statistics, Vital and Health Statistics Series 6, 1-34.
23. Statistics Finland (2006). Time use survey of families. www.stat.fi loaded 3.7.2006.
24. Turconi G, Guarcello M, Berzolari FG, Carolei A, Bazzano R, Roggi C (2005). An evaluation of a color food photography atlas as a tool for quantifying food portion size in epidemiological dietary survey. Eur J Clin Nutr 59, 923-931.
25. Vartiainen E, Laatikainen T, Tapanainen H, Salomaa V, Jousilahti P, Sundvall J et al. (2003). Changes in cardiovascular risk factors in the National FINRISK Study between 1982 and 2002 (in Finnish: Suomalaisten sydan- ja verisuonitautien riskitekijät FINRISKI-tutkimuksessa 1982-2002). Suomen Lääkärilehti 58, 4099-4106.