Cohesion as a constraint on object persistence in infancy: Paper

Developmental Science

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 427-432

  Cheries, Erik W ^a,b   Mitroff, Stephen R ^c   Wynn, Karen ^b   Scholl, Brian J ^b  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFANT; MALE; VISION;

CHILD DEVELOPMENT; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT; MALE; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 43449121862     PISSN: 1363755X     EISSN: 14677687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00687.x     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Baillargeon, R. DeVos, J. (1991). Object permanence in young infants: further evidence. Child Development, 62, 1227 1246.
2. Baillargeon, R., Spelke, E.S. Wasserman, S. (1985). Object permanence in five-month-old infants. Cognition, 20, 191 208.
3. Bloom, P. (2000). How children learn the meanings of words. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
4. Bogartz, R.S., Shinskey, J.L. Speaker, C.J. (1997). Interpreting infant looking: the Event Set × Event Set design. Developmental Psychology, 33, 408 422.
5. Carey, S. Spelke, E. (1996). Science and core knowledge. Philosophy of Science, 63, 515 533.
6. Carey, S. Xu, F. (2001). Infants' knowledge of objects: beyond object-files and object tracking. Cognition, 80, 179 213.
7. Chiang, W.-C. Wynn, K. (2000). Infants' tracking of objects and collections. Cognition, 77, 169 195.
8. Feigenson, L. (2005). A double dissociation in infants' representation of object arrays. Cognition, 95, B37 B48.
9. Feigenson, L., Carey, S. Hauser, M. (2002). The representations underlying infants' choice of more: object files versus analog magnitudes. Psychological Science, 13, 150 156.
10. Huntley-Fenner, G., Carey, S. Solimando, A. (2002). Objects are individuals but stuff doesn't count: perceived rigidity and cohesiveness influence infants' representations of small numbers of discrete entities. Cognition, 85, 203 221.
11. Kahneman, D. Treisman, A. (1984). Changing views of attention and automaticity. In R. Parasuraman D.R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 29 61). New York : Academic Press.
12. Kahneman, D., Treisman, A. Gibbs, B.J. (1992). The reviewing of object files: object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 174 219.
13. McCrink, K. Wynn, K. (2004). Large number addition and subtraction by 9-month-old infants. Psychological Science, 15, 776 781.
14. Mitroff, S.R., Scholl, B.J. Wynn, K. (2004). Divide and conquer: how object files adapt when a persisting object splits into two. Psychological Science, 15, 420 425.
15. Mitroff, S.R., Simons, D.J. Levin, D.T. (2004). Nothing compares 2 views: change blindness can occur despite preserved access to the changed information. Perception and Psychophysics, 66, 1268 1281.
16. Pinker, S. (1997). How the mind works. New York : Norton London : Penguin.
17. Rosenberg, R.D. Carey, S. (2006). Infants' indexing of objects vs. non-cohesive substances. Poster presented at the Vision Sciences Society, Sarasota, Florida. [Abstract] Journal of Vision, 6 (6 611a, http:// journalofvision.org/6/6/611/
18. Scholl, B.J. Leslie, A.M. (1999). Explaining the infant's object concept: beyond the perception/cognition dichotomy. In E. Lepore Z. Pylyshyn (Eds.), What is cognitive science? (pp. 26 73). Oxford : Blackwell.
19. Shinskey, J.L. Munakata, Y. (2003). Are infants in the dark about hidden objects? Developmental Science, 6, 273 282.
20. Simon, T.J., Hespos, S.J. Rochat, P. (1995). Do infants understand simple arithmetic? A replication of Wynn (1992). Cognitive Development, 10, 253 269.
21. Spelke, E.S. (1990). Principles of object perception. Cognitive Science, 14, 29 56.
22. Spelke, E.S. (1994). Initial knowledge: six suggestions, Cognition, 50, 431 445.
23. Spelke, E.S. (1998). Nativism, empiricism, and the origins of knowledge. Infant Behavior and Development, 21, 181 200.
24. Spelke, E.S. (2000). Core knowledge. American Psychologist, 55, 1233 1243.
25. Spelke, E.S., Breinlinger, K., Macomber, J. Jacobson, K. (1992). Origins of knowledge. Psychological Review, 99, 605 632.
26. Spelke, E.S., Kestenbaum, R., Simons, D. Wein, D. (1995). Spatiotemporal continuity, smoothness of motion and object identity in infancy. The British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 13, 113 142.
27. Spelke, E.S. Kinzler, K.D. (2007). Core knowledge. Developmental Science, 10, 89 96.
28. Spelke, E.S. Van de Walle, G. (1993). Perceiving and reasoning about objects: insights from infants. In N. Eilan, R. McCarthy W. Brewer (Eds.), Spatial representation (pp. 132 161). Oxford : Basil Blackwell.
29. Tremoulet, P., Leslie, A.M. Hall, G. (2000). Infant attention to the shape and color of objects: individuation and identification. Cognitive Development, 15, 499 522.
30. vanMarle, K. Scholl, B.J. (2003). Attentive tracking of objects vs. substances. Psychological Science, 14, 498 504.
31. Wilcox, T. Baillargeon, R. (1998). Object individuation in infancy: the use of featural information in reasoning about occlusion events. Cognitive Psychology, 37, 97 155.
32. Wilcox, T. Chapa, C. (2004). Priming infants to use color and pattern information in an individuation task. Cognition, 90, 265 302.
33. Wynn, K. (1992). Addition and subtraction by human infants. Nature, 358, 749 750.
34. Xu, F. Carey, S. (1996). Infants' metaphysics: the case of numerical identity. Cognitive Psychology, 30, 111 153.