Four types of disabilities: Their impact on online learning

TechTrends

Volumn 52, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 51-55

  Crow, Kevin L ^a  

^a Harper College   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 43449119215     PISSN: 87563894     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11528-008-0112-6     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. American Foundation for the Blind. (2006). Blindness statistics. Retrieved January 28, 2006, from http://www.afb.org/Section.asp?SectionID=15
2. American Foundation for the Blind. (2007). Glossary of eye conditions. Retrieved May 22, 2007, from http://www.afb.org/seniorsite.asp?SectionID=63&DocumentID=2139
3. Bohman, P. (2003). Introduction to Web accessibility. Retrieved November 25, 2005, from http://www.webaim.org/intro/?templatetype=3
4. Bohman, P., & Anderson, S. (2005, May 10–14). A conceptual framework for accessibility tools to benefit users with cognitive disabilities. Paper presented at the 2nd Annual International Cross-Disciplinary Workshop on Web Accessibility, Chiba, Japan.
5. Crow, K. L. (2006) Accommodating on-line postsecondary students who have disabilities. Dissertation submitted for publication, Northern Illinois University.
6. DOC. (2002). A nation online: How Americans are expanding their use of the Internet. Retrieved January 28, 2006, from http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/dn/html/anationonline2.htm
7. Foley, A., & Regan, B. (2002). Web design for accessibility: Policies and practice. Educational Technology Review. Retrieved November 3, 2005, from http://www.aace.org/pubs/etr/issue2/foley.cfm
8. Hudson, L. (2002, Winter). A new age of accessibility. Library Journal netConnect, 19–21.
9. NIDCD. (2006). Statistics about hearing disorders, ear infections, and deafness. Retrieved January 28, 2006, from http://www.nidcd.nih.gov/health/statistics/hearing.asp
10. M. G. Paciello 2000 Web accessibility for people with disabilities Publishers Group West Berkeley, CA Paciello, M. G. (2000). Web accessibility for people with disabilities. Berkeley, CA: Publishers Group West.
11. Rowland, C. (2004). Cognitive disabilities part 2: Conceptualizing design considerations. Retrieved November 25, 2005, from http://www.webaim.org/techniques/articles/conceptualize/?templatetype=3
12. Seeman, L. (2002, May 7–11). Inclusion of cognitive disabilities in the web accessibility movement. Paper presented at the 11th International World Wide Web Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii.
13. Section 508 Standards, 29 U.S.C. 1194.1 et seq. (1998). [Aka: Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Section 508 Standards, 29 U.S.C. 1194 et seq. 508 (1998)].
14. Tobias, J. (2003). Universal design: Is it really about design? Information Technology and Disabilities. Retrieved December 1, 2005, from http://www.rit.edu/~easi/itd/itdv09n2/tobias.htm
15. Vanderheiden, G., & Tobias, J. (2006). Universal design of consumer products: Current industry practice and perceptions. Retrieved February 15, 2006, from http://trace.wisc.edu/docs/ud_consumer_products_hfes2000/
16. WebAIM. (2006). Motor disabilities. Retrieved January 30, 2006, from http://www.webaim.org/techniques/motor/?templatetype=3
17. Wimberly, L., Reed, N., & Morris, M. (2004). Postsecondary students with learning disabilities: Barriers to accessing education-based information technology. Information Technology and Disabilities. Retrieved December 1, 2005, from http://www.rit.edu/~easi/itd/itdv10n1/wimberly.htm