Model reduction technique for mechanical behaviour modelling: Efficiency criteria and validity domain assessment

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science

Volumn 222, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 493-505

  Ordaz Hernandez, K ^a,b   Fischer, X ^b,c   Bennis, F ^a  

^a ECOLE CENTRALE DE NANTES   (France)

^b Technopôle Izarbel   (France)

^c ARTS ET MÉTIERS PARISTECH   (France)

Author keywords

Artificial neural network; Cantilever beam; Model reduction; Non linear behaviour; Validity domain

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; NEURAL NETWORKS;

MODEL REDUCTION; NON-LINEAR BEHAVIOR; VALIDITY DOMAIN ASSESSMENT;

CANTILEVER BEAMS;

CANTILEVER BEAMS; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; NEURAL NETWORKS;

EID: 43449105886     PISSN: 09544062     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1243/09544062JMES683     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Rembold, U., Nnaji, B. O., and Storr, A. Computer integrated manufacturing and engineering, 1993 (Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA).
2. Hazelrigg, G. A. On the role and use of mathematical models in engineering design. J. Mech. Des., 1999, 121(3), 336-341.
3. Lucia, D. J., Beran, P. S., and Silva, W. A. Reduced-order modeling: new approaches for computational physics. Prog. Aerosp. Sci., 2004, 40(1-2), 51-17.
4. Fischer, X. and Coutellier, D. (Eds) Research in interactive design, vol. 2, 2006 (Springer, France).
5. Cartwright, A. J. Interactive prototyping - a challenge for computer based design. Res. Eng. Des., 1997, 9(1), 10-19.
6. Sundaraj, K. and Laugier, C. Physically realistic simulation of large deformations using LEM for interactive applications. In IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Lausanne, Switzerland, vol. 3, 2002, pp. 3054-3059.
7. Berkley, J., Turkiyyah, G., Berg, D., Ganter, M., and Weghorst, S. Real-time finite element modeling for surgery simulation: an application to virtual suturing. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graphics, 2004, 10(3), 314-325.
8. Rabaetje, R. Real-time simulation of deformable objects for assembly simulations. In CRPITS '18: Proceedings of the Fourth Australian User Interface Conference on User Interfaces 2003, Australian Computer Society, Inc., 2003, pp. 57-64.
9. Nikitin, I., Nikitina, L., Frolov, P., Goebbels, G., Göbel, M., Klimenko, S. et al. Real-time simulation of elastic objects in virtual environments using finite element method and precomputed Green's functions. In EGVE '02: Proceedings of the Workshop on Virtual Environments 2002, Eurographics Association, 2002, pp. 47-52.
10. Diab, Y., Ville, F., Houjoh, H., Sainsot, P., and Velex, P. Experimental and numerical investigations on the air-pumping phenomenon in high-speed spur and helical gears. Proc. IMechE, Part C: J. Mechanical Engineering Science, 2005, 219(C8), 785-800.
11. Slavic, J. and Boltežar, M. Non-linearity and non-smoothness in multi-body dynamics: application to woodpecker toy. Proc. IMechE, Part C: J. Mechanical Engineering Science, 2006, 220(C3), 285-296.
12. Troussier, N., Pourroy, F., and Tollenaere, M. Information structuring for use and reuse of mechanical analysis models in engineering design. J. Intell. Manuf., 1999, 10(1), 61-71.
13. Castellano, G. and Fanelli, A. M. A neuro-fuzzy model reduction strategy. In International Conference on Neural Networks, 1997, vol. 1, 528-532.
14. Guyan, R. J. Reduction of stiffness and mass matrices. AIAA J., 1965, 3(2), 380-380.
15. Rewlenski, M. J. A trajectory piecewise-linear approach to model order reduction of nonlinear dynamical systems. PhD Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2003.
16. Kambhatla, N. and Leen, T. K. Fast nonlinear dimension reduction. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, vol. 3, 1993, pp. 1213-1218.
17. Hornik, K., Stinchcombe, M., and White, H. Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators (abstract). Neural Netw., 1989, 2(5), 359-366.
18. Liang, Y. C., Lin, W. Z., Lee, H. P., Lim, S. P., Lee, K. H., and Feng, D. P. A neural-networkbased method of model reduction for the dynamic simulation of MEMS. J. Micromech. Microeng., 2001, 11(3), 226-233.
19. Ang, M. H., Jr, Wei, W., and Teck-Seng, L. On the estimation of the large deflection of a cantilever beam. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Electronics, Control, and Instrumentation (IECON), Maui, HI, USA: IEEE, vol. 3, 1993, 1604-1609.
20. Rafiq, M. Y., Bugmann, G., and Easterbrook, D. J. Neural network design for engineering applications. Comput. Struct., 2001, 79(17), 1541-1552.
21. Kumar, R., Ramachandra, L. S., and Roy, D. Techniques based on genetic algorithms for large deflection analysis of beams. Sādhanā - Academy Proceedings in Engineering Sciences, vol. 29, 2004, pp. 589-604.
22. Chen, C. L. P. A rapid supervised learning neural network for function interpolation and approximation, IEEE Trans. Neural Netw., 1996, 7(5), 1220-1230.
23. Lin, Z., Khorasani, K., and Patel, R. V. A counter-propagation neural network for function approximation. In Proceedings of the International Conference Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Washington, USA, IEEE, 1990, 382-384.
24. Sanger, T. D. A tree-structured adaptive network for function approximation in high-dimensional spaces. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw., 1991, 2(2), 285-293.
25. Tsoukalas, L. H. and Uhrig, R. E. Fuzzy and neural approaches in engineering, 1997 (John Wiley & Sons).
26. Waszczyszyn, Z. and Ziemiansid, L. Neural networks in mechanics of structures and materials - new results and prospects of applications. Comput. Struct., 2001, 79(22-25), 2261-2276.
27. Consolazio, G. R. Iterative equation solver for bridge analysis using neural networks. Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng., 2000, 15(2), 107-119.
28. Grzeszczuk, R., Terzopoulos, D., and Hinton, G. NeuroAnimator: fast neural network emulation and control of physics-based models. In SIGGRAPH '98: Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, New York, NY, ACM Press, 1998, pp. 9-20.
29. Atalla, M. J. Model updating using neural networks. Dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1996.
30. Meade, A. J., Jr. and Fernandez, A. A. The numerical solution of linear ordinary differential equations by feedforward neural networks. Math Comput Modeling, 1994, 19(12), 1-25.
31. Meade, A. J., Jr. and Fernandez, A. A. Solution of nonlinear ordinary differential equations by feedforward neural networks. Math Comput Modeling, 1994, 20(9), 19-44.
32. Lagaris, I. E., Likas, A., and Fotiadis, D. I. Artificial neural networks for solving ordinary and partial differential equations. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw., 1998, 9(5), 987-1000.
33. Zienkiewicz, O. C. and Taylor, R. L. The finite element method - the basis, 5th edition, vol. 1, 2000 (Butterworth-Heinemann).
34. Sun, M., Yan, X., and Sclabassi, R. J. Solving partial differential equations in realtime using artificial neural network signal processing as an alternative to finite-element analysis. In Proceedings of the 2003 International Conference on Neural Networks and Signal Processing, vol. 1, 2003, pp, 381-384.
35. Capizzi, G., Coco, S., Laudani, A., and Pulvirenti, R. A multilayer perceptron neural model for the differentiation of Laplacian 3-D finite-element solutions. IEEE Trans. Magn., 2003, 39(3), 1277-1280.
36. Guo, F., Zhang, P., Wang, F., Ma, X., and Qiu, G. Finite element analysis based Hopfield neural network model for solving nonlinear electromagnetic field problems. In International Joint Conference on Neural Networks IJCNN '99, Washington, DC, vol. 6, 1999, pp. 4399-4403.
37. Kalkkuhl, J., Hunt, K. J., and Fritz, H. FEM-based neural-network approach to nonlinear modeling with application to longitudinal vehicle dynamics control. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw., 1999, 10(4), 885-897.
38. Yamashita, H., Kowata, N., Cingoski, V., and Kaneda, K. Direct solution method for finite element analysis using Hopfield neural network. IEEE Trans. Magn., 1995, 31(3), 1964-1967.
39. Yang, X., Wang, Y., Liu, F., Yang, Q., and Yan, W. The use of neural networks combined with FEM to optimize the coil geometry and structure of transverse flux induction equipments. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond., 2004, 14(2), 1854-1857.
40. Low, T. S. and Chao, B. The use of finite elements and neural networks for the solution of inverse electromagnetic problems. IEEE Trans. Magn., 1992, 28(5), 2811-2813.
41. Lefik, M. and Schrefler, B. A. Artificial neural network as an incremental non-linear constitutive model for a finite element code. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 2003, 192(28-30), 3265-3283.
42. Li, S. Global flexibility simulation and element stiffness simulation in finite element analysis with neural network. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 2000, 186(1), 101-108.
43. Suk, J. W., Kim, J. H., and Kim, Y. H. A predictor algorithm for fast geometricallynonlinear dynamic analysis. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 2003, 192(22-24), 2521-2538.
44. Svozil, D., Kvasnicka, V., and Pospichal, J. Introduction to multi-layer feed-forward neural networks. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst., 1997, 39(1), 43-62.
45. Felippa, C. A. Nonlinear finite element methods, 2004 (Department of Aerospace Engineering Sciences, University of Colorado at Boulder) (ASEN 5107).
46. Beléndez, T., Neipp, C., and Beléndez, A. Large and small deflections of a cantilever beam. Eur J Phys., 2002, 23(3), 371-379.
47. Horr, A. M. and Schmidt, L. C. Closed-form solution for the Timoshenko beam theory using a computer-based mathematical package. Comput. Struct., 1995, 55(3), 405-412.
48. Jing, Q., Mukherjee, T., and Fedder, G. K. Large-deflection beam model for schematic-based behavioral simulation in NODAS. In Nanotech: Technical Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Modeling and Simulation of Microsystems (MSM '02), San Juan, Puerto Rico: NSTI, vol. 1, 2002, pp. 136-139.
49. Urthaler, Y. and Reddy, J. N. A corotational finite element formulation for the analysis of planar beams. Commun. Numer. Methods Eng., 2005, 21(10), 553-570.
50. Reddy, J. N., Wang, C. M., and Lam, K. Y. Unified finite elements based on the classical and shear deformation theories of beams and axisymmetric circular plates. Commun. Numer. Methods Eng., 1997, 13(6), 495-510.
51. Solano Carrillo, E. The cantilevered beam: an analytical solution for general deflections of linear-elastic materials. Eur. J. Phys., 2006, 27(6), 1437-1445.
52. Martini, K. A particle-system approach to real-time non-linear analysis. In Proceedings of the 7th National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, CD-ROM, 2002, p. 9.
53. Lages, E. N., Paulino, G. H., Menezes, I. F. M., and Silva, R. R. Nonlinear finite element analysis using an object-oriented philosophy - application to beam elements and to the cosserat continuum. Eng. Comput., 1999, 15(1), 73-89.
54. Boyer, F. and Primault, D. Finite element of slender beams in finite transformations: a geometrically exact approach. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 2004, 59(5), 669-702.
55. Argyris, J. H., Hilpert, O., Malejannakis, G. A., and Scharpf, D. W. On the geometrical stiffness of a beam in space - a consistent V.W. approach. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 1979, 20(1), 105-131.
56. Schudz, M. and Filippou, F. C. Non-linear spatial Timoshenko beam element with curvature interpolation. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 2001, 50(4), 761-785.
57. Klinkel, S. and Govindjee, S. Using finite strain 3D-material models in beam and shell elements. Eng. Comput. Int J Comput.-Aided Eng., 2002, 19(3), 254-271.
58. Hsiao, K. M. and Hou, F. Y. Nonlinear finite element analysis of elastic frames. Comput. Struct., 1987, 26(4), 693-701.
59. Spacone, E., Ciampi, V., and Filippou, F. C. Mixed formulation of nonlinear beam finite element. Comput. Struct., 1996, 58(1), 71-83.
60. Bathe, K. J. Finite element procedures, 1996 (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).
61. Arbib, M. A. (Ed.) The handbook of brain theory and neural networks, 2nd edition, 2003 (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts).
62. Yu, L., Wang, S., and Lai, K. K. An integrated data preparation scheme for neural network data analysis. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., 2006, 18(2), 217-230.