European air pollution assessments: Co-production of science and policy

International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 35-49

  Tuinstra, Willemijn ^a  

^a PBL NETHERLANDS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AGENCY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Air pollution; Boundary work; CAFE; Co production; European environmental policy; Integrated assessment; LRTAP; Science policy interface

Indexed keywords

ASSESSMENT METHOD; ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; EUROPEAN COMMISSION; EUROPEAN UNION; LONG RANGE TRANSPORT;

EURASIA; EUROPE;

EID: 43449086391     PISSN: 15679764     EISSN: 15731553     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10784-008-9064-8     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Alcamo, J., & Bartnicki, J. (1990). The uncertainty of atmospheric source-receptor relationships in Europe. Atmospheric Environment, 24, 2169-2189.
2. Altman, A., Amann, M., Klaassen, G., Ruszczynski, A., & Schöpp, W. (1996). Cost-effective sulphur emission reduction under uncertainty. European Journal of Operational Research, 90, 395-412.
3. Amann, M., Bertok, I., Cofala, J., Gyarfas, F., Heyes, C., Klimont, Z., Makowski, M., Schöpp, W., & Syri, S. (1999). Cost-effective control of acidification and ground-level ozone. IIASA Interim Reports. Laxenburg: IIASA.
4. Amann, M., Cofala, J., Heyes, C., Klimont, Z., Mechler, R., Posch, M., & Schöpp, W. (2004). The RAINS model. Documentation of the model approach prepared for the RAINS peer review 2004. Laxenburg: IIASA interim reports.
5. Amann, M., Vainio, M., & Wieringa, K. (2001, October). The role of integrated assessment within CAFE (Note for the Steering Group of CAFE, Brussels). http://www.europa.eu.int/comm/environment/air/cafe/pdf/ steering_technical_group/011008_ia_note.pdf
6. ApSimon, H., & Warren, R. (1996). Transboundary air pollution in Europe. Energy Policy 24, 631-640.
7. ApSimon, H., Warren, R., & Wilson, J. (1994). The Abatement Strategies Assessment Model-ASAM: Applications to reductions of sulphur dioxide emissions across Europe. Atmospheric Environment, 24, 649-663.
8. AQSG. (2001). Summary report of the meeting of Air Quality Steering Group (AQSG) held on 23 January 2001. http://www.europa.eu.int/comm/environment/air/ cafe/pdf/steering_technical_group/minutes010123.pdf
9. Botcheva-Andonova, L. (2001). Expertise and international governance: The role of economic assessments in the approximation of EU environmental legislation in eastern Europe. Global Governance, 7, 197-224.
10. CAFE Steering Group. (2001). Summary report on the second the meeting of the CAFE Steering Group held on 8-9 October 2001. http://www.europa.eu.int/comm/ environment/air/cafe/pdf/steering_technical_group/minutes011008.pdf
11. Castells, N, & Nijkamp, P. (1998). Transboundary risks: The first-comers/late-comers dilemma in international environmental agreements. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 6, 117-128.
12. Castells, N., & Ravetz, J. (2001). Science and policy in international environmental agreements: Lessons from the European experience on Transboundary Air Pollution. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 1, 405-425.
13. Eckley, N., Clark, W., Farrell, A., Jäger, J., & Stanners, D. (2001). Designing effective assessments: The role of participation, science and governance, and focus. Environmental issue report 26. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency.
14. Farrell, A. E., Jäger, J. (Eds.). (2005). Assessments of regional and global environmental risks: Designing processes for the effective use of science in decision making. Washington, D.C: RFF Press.
15. Farrell, A. E., Jäger, J., & VanDeveer, S. (2005). Overview: Understanding design choices. In A. E. Farrell & J. Jäger (Eds.), Assessments of regional and global environmental risks: Designing processes for the effective use of science in decision making. Washington, D.C.: RFF Press.
16. Farrell, A. E., & Keating, T. J. (2005). Dissent and trust in multilateral assessments. In A. E. Farrell & J. Jäger (Eds.), Assessments of regional and global environmental risks: Designing processes for the effective use of science in decision making. Washington, D.C.: RFF Press.
17. Farrell, A. E., VanDeveer, S. D., & Jäger, J. (2001). Environmental assessments: Four underappreciated elements of design. Global Environmental Change, 11, 311-333.
18. Gieryn, T. F. (1995). Boundaries of science. In S. Jasanoff, J. C. Petersen, T. Pinch, & G. E. Markle (Eds.), Handbook of science and technology studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
19. Gough, C., Castells, N. & Funtowicz, S. (1998). Integrated assessment: An emerging methodology for complex issues. Environmental Modelling and Assessment, 3, 19-29.
20. Grennfelt, P., Erisman, J. W., Forsberg, B., Fowler, D., Fudala, J., Hov, Ø., Keating, T., Lazaridis, M., Woodfield, M., & Zylicz, T. (2004). Final Report, Service Contract for Review of the RAINS Integrated Assessment Model-Reference ENV.C1/SER/2003/0079. http://www.europa.eu.int/comm/environment/ air/cafe/activities/rain_model.pdf
21. Grennfelt, P., & Hov, Ø. (2005). Regional air pollution at a turning point. Ambio, 34, 2-10.
22. Grünfeld, H. (1999). Creating favourable conditions for international environmental change through knowledge and negotiation. Lessons from the Rhine Action Program and the Second Sulphur Protocol, implications for climate change. Dissertation, Delft University.
23. Halffman, W. (2003). Boundaries of regulatory science: Eco/toxicology and aquatic hazards of chemicals in the US, England and the Netherlands. Dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
24. Hordijk, L. (1991). Use of the RAINS model in acid rain negotiations in Europe. Environmental Science & Technology, 25, 596-603.
25. Jasanoff, S. (1990). The fifth branch: Science advisers as policymakers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26. Jasanoff, S. (1996). Beyond epistemology: Relativism and engagement in the politics of science. Social Studies of Science 26, 393-418.
27. Jasanoff, S. (Ed.). (2004). States of knowledge: The co-production of science and social order. London: Routledge.
28. Levy, M. (1993). European acid rain: The power of toteboard diplomacy. In P. M. Haas, R. O. Keohane, & M. A. Levy (Eds.), Institutions for the Earth (pp 75-133). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29. Maas, R., Amann, M., ApSimon, H., Hordijk, L., & Tuinstra, W. (2004). Integrated assessment modelling-the tool. In J. Sliggers & W. Kakebeeke (Eds.), Clearing the air. 25 years of the Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution (pp. 85-96). New York and Geneva: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe.
30. Miller, C. (2001). Hybrid management: Boundary organizations, science policy, and environmental governance in the climate regime. Science, Technology & Human Values 26, 478-500.
31. Reis, S., Nitter, S., & Friedrich, R. (2005). Innovative approaches in integrated assessment modelling of European air pollution control strategies-implications of dealing with multi-pollutant multi-effect problems. Environmental Modelling & Software, 20, 1524-1531.
32. Schneider, T., & Schneider, J. (2004). EMEP-backbone of the convention. In J. Sliggers & W. Kakebeeke (Eds.), Clearing the air. 25 years of the Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution, United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. New York and Geneva: United Nations.
33. Schöpp, W., Klimont, Z., Suutari, R., & Cofala, J. (2005). Uncertainty analysis of emission estimates in the RAINS integrated assessment model. Environmental Science & Policy, 8, 601-613.
34. Selin, H., & VanDeveer, S. D. (2003). Mapping institutional linkages in European air pollution politics. Global Environmental Politics, 3, 14-31.
35. Shackley, S., & Wynne, B. (1995). Global climate change: The mutual construction of an emerging policy field. Science and Public Policy, 22, 218-230.
36. Shapin, S., & Schaffer, S. (1985). Leviathan and the air pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the experimental life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
37. Sliggers, J., & Kakebeeke, W. (Eds.). (2004). Clearing the air. 25 years of the Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution. New York and Geneva: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe.
38. Sundqvist, G., Letell, M., & Lidskog, R. (2002). Science and policy in air pollution abatement strategies. Environmental Science & Policy, 5, 147-156.
39. Suutari, R., Amann, M., Cofala, J., Klimont, Z., Posch, M., & Schöpp, W. (2001). From economic activities to ecosystem protection in Europe. An uncertainty analysis of two scenarios of the RAINS integrated assessment model. EMEP CIAM/CCE Report 1/2001. Laxenburg: IIASA.
40. Syri, S., Suutari, R., & Posch, M. (2000). From emissions in europe to critical load exceedances in Finland-uncertainty analysis of acidification integrated assessment. Environmental Science & Policy, 2, 263-276.
41. Tuinstra, W. (2007). Preparing for the European Thematic Strategy on air pollution: At the interface between science and policy. Environmental Science and Policy, 10, 434-444.
42. Tuinstra, W., Hordijk, L., & Amann, M. (1999). Using computer models in international negotiations/the case of acidification in Europe. Environment, 41, 33-42.
43. Tuinstra, W., Hordijk, L., & Kroeze, C. (2006). Moving boundaries in Transboundary Air Pollution: Co-production of science and policy under the convention of Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution. Global Environmental Change, 16, 349-363.
44. VanDeveer, S. (2004). Ordering environments: Regions in European international environment cooperation. In S. Jasanoff & M. Long-Martello (Eds.), Earthly politics. Global and local knowledge in environmental governance. Cambridge: MIT Press.
45. VanDeveer, S. (2005). European politics with a scientific face. Framing, asymmetrical participation, and capacity in LRTAP. In A. E. Farrell & J. Jäger (Eds.), Assessments of regional and global environmental risks: Designing processes for the effective use of science in decision making. Washington, D.C.: RFF Press.
46. Warren, R. F., & ApSimon, H. M. (2000). Application of limiting marginal abatement costs in optimised strategies to reduce acidification and eutrophication in Europe: Illustrations using the Abatement Strategies Assessment Model (ASAM). Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 2, 119-166.
47. Wettestad, J. (2002). Clearing the air: European advances in tackling acid rain and atmospheric pollution. Aldershot: Ashgate.