|
Volumn 96, Issue 16, 2004, Pages 1200-1201
|
For breast cancer screening, there is room for improvement, report concludes
a
a
NONE
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
AUSTRALIA;
BREAST BIOPSY;
BREAST CANCER;
BREAST CARCINOMA;
CANCER DIAGNOSIS;
CANCER RISK;
CANCER SCREENING;
COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS;
EARLY DIAGNOSIS;
FEMALE;
HEALTH CARE COST;
HEALTH EDUCATION;
HEALTH INSURANCE;
HUMAN;
MAMMOGRAPHY;
MASS MEDIUM;
NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE;
NETHERLANDS;
NOTE;
PAGET NIPPLE DISEASE;
PARAMEDICAL EDUCATION;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE;
RADIOLOGIST;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
SWEDEN;
UNITED KINGDOM;
UNITED STATES;
ARTICLE;
BREAST TUMOR;
MASS SCREENING;
METHODOLOGY;
RADIOGRAPHY;
STANDARD;
BREAST NEOPLASMS;
CARCINOMA, INTRADUCTAL, NONINFILTRATING;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
MAMMOGRAPHY;
MASS SCREENING;
UNITED STATES;
|
EID: 4344706255
PISSN: 00278874
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1093/jnci/96.16.1200 Document Type: Note |
Times cited : (2)
|
References (0)
|