Assessment of the current US seismic displacement requirements for bridges in a low-moderate seismic zone

Engineering Structures

Volumn 26, Issue 10, 2004, Pages 1365-1379

  Frank Chen, Y ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

AASHTO; Bridge; Design; Displacement; Modeling; Response; Seismic; Spectra

Indexed keywords

ELASTIC SEISMIC ANALYSIS; GROUND ACCELERATION; SEISMIC ZONES;

ACCELERATION; EARTHQUAKES; ELASTICITY; PLASTIC BUILDING MATERIALS; SEISMOLOGY; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

HYDRAULIC STRUCTURES;

BRIDGE; EARTHQUAKE RESPONSE; SEISMIC RESPONSE;

BRIDGE; EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; SEISMIC RESPONSE;

EID: 4344705990     PISSN: 01410296     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.05.002     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. AASHTO Load and resistance factor design (LRFD) specifications for highway bridges 1998 American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Washington (DC)
2. Buckle IG, Mayes RL, Button MR. Seismic design and retrofit manual for highway bridges. Report FHWA-IP-87-6. Springfield (VA): US Department of Transportation; 1987.
3. ATC. Seismic retrofitting guidelines for highway bridges (ATC-6-2). Report FHWA/RD-83/007. Springfield (VA): Applied Technology Council (ATC); 1983.
4. AASHTO Standard specifications for highway bridges 1992 American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Washington (DC)
5. PADOT Design manual 15M 1996 Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PADOT) Harrisburg (PA)
6. PADOT Design manual 15M 2000 Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PADOT) Harrisburg (PA)
7. Paz M. Structural dynamics 1997 Chapman and Hall, Inc New York
8. Chopra A.K. Dynamics of structures 1995 Prentice Hall, Inc Englewood Cliffs (NJ)
9. Kiureghian AD. A response spectrum method for random vibration. Report No. UCB/EERC-80/15. Berkeley (CA): Earthquake Engineering Research Center (EERC), University of California; 1980.
10. Donovan N.C. A statistical evaluation of strong motion data including the February 9, 1971 San Fernando Earthquake Proceedings of the Fifth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Rome, Italy 1973
11. Esteva L. Geology and predictability in the assessment of seismic risk Proceedings of the Second International Conference of the Association of Engineering Geologists, San Paulo, Brazil 1974
12. CALTRANS Standard specifications for highway bridges relating to seismic design 1995 California Department of Transportation (CALTRANS) Sacramento (CA)
13. Seed H.B. Site dependent spectra for earthquake resistant design Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 66 1 1976
14. Abdypoor G. Bischke R.E. Earthquakes felt in the state of Pennsylvania 1982 Department of Geology, Temple University Philadelphia (PA)
15. Scharnberger C.K. Earthquake hazard in Pennsylvania 1989 Pennsylvania Geological Survey Harrisburg (PA)
16. Gates JH, Smith MJ. Verification of dynamic modeling methods by prototype excitation. Report FHWA/CA/SD-82-07. Springfield (VA): Federal Highway Administration (FHWA); 1982.
17. ACI Building code requirements for reinforced concrete (ACI 318-95) 1995 American Concrete Institute (ACI) Detroit (MI)
18. MacGregor J.G. Oelhafen V.H. Hage S.E. A reexamination of the EI value for slender columns, reinforced concrete columns 1975 American Concrete Institute (ACI) Detroit (MI) [Publication SP-50]
19. MacGregor JG, Hage SE. Stability analysis and design of concrete frames. Proceedings, ASCE 1977; 103(ST 10).
20. Bowles J.E. Foundation analysis and design 1996 McGraw Hill, Inc New York
21. PADOT PADOT seismic design and rehabilitation policy (SOL 431-94-57) 1994 Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PADOT) Harrisburg (PA)
22. SEISAB Computer program-seismic analysis of bridges (SEISAB), Ver. 4.1 1995 Imbsen and Associates Sacramento (CA)
23. PCACOL Computer program-strength design of reinforced concrete column sections (PCACOL), Ver. 2.3 1993 Portland Cement Association (PCA) Skokie (IL)