Evaluation of classic 2D time-of-flight MR angiography in the depiction of severe carotid stenosis

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 183, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 787-793

  DeMarco, J Kevin ^a   Huston III, John ^b   Bernstein, Matt A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY OF NEW JERSEY   (United States)

^b MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTERY DIAMETER; ARTICLE; CAROTID ARTERY BIFURCATION; CAROTID ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CAROTID ARTERY SURGERY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; DOPPLER ECHOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE DISPLAY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIPLE OVERLAPPING THIN SLAB ACQUISITION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TECHNIQUE; TWO DIMENSIONAL TIME OF FLIGHT MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY;

EID: 4344702605     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.183.3.1830787     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Nederkoorn PJ, Mali WP, Eikelboom BC, et al. Preoperative diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of noninvasive testing. Stroke 2002; 33:2003-2008
2. Long A, Lepoutre A, Corbillon E, Branchereau A, Kretz JG. Modalities of preoperative imaging of the internal carotid artery used in France. Ann Vasc Surg 2002;16:261-265
3. Huston J 3rd, Nichols DA, Luetmer PH, et al. MR angiographic and sonographic indications for endarterectomy. AJNR 1998;19:309-315
4. DeMarco JK, Schonfeld S, Wesbey G. Can noninvasive studies replace conventional angiography in the preoperative evaluation of carotid stenosis? (review) Neuroimaging Clin N Am 1996;6:911-929
5. Kent KC, Kuntz KM, Patel MR, et al. Perioperative imaging strategies for carotid endarterectomy: an analysis of morbidity and cost-effectiveness in symptomatic patients. JAMA 1995;274:888-893
6. Patel MR, Kuntz KM, Klufas RA, et al. Preoperative assessment of the carotid bifurcation: can magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography replace contrast arteriography? Srroke 1995;26:1753-1758
7. Huston J 3rd, Fain SB, Wald JT, et al. Carotid artery: elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography compared with conventional angiography. Radiology 2001;218:138-143
8. Randoux B, Marro B, Koskas F, et al. Carotid artery stenosis: prospective comparison of CT, three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR, and conventional angiography. Radiology 2001;220:179-185
9. Wutke R, Lang W, Fellner C, et al. High-resolution, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography with elliptical centric k-space ordering of supra-aortic arteries compared with selective X-ray angiography. Stroke 2002;33:1522-1529
10. Remonda L, Senn P, Barth A, Arnold M, Lovblad KO, Schroth G. Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the carotid artery: comparison with conventional digital subtraction angiography. (commentary) AJNR 2002;23:213-219
11. Lenhart M, Framme N, Volk M, et al. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the carotid arteries: diagnostic accuracy and inter-observer variability compared with selective catheter angiography. Invest Radiol 2002;37:535-541
12. Huston J 3rd, Lewis BD, Wiebers DO, Meyer FB, Riederer SJ, Weaver AL. Carotid artery: prospective blinded comparison of two-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography with conventional angiography and duplex US. Radiology 1993;186:339-344
13. Johnston DC, Eastwood JD, Nguyen T, Goldstein LB. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of carotid arteries: utility in routine clinical practice. Stroke 2002;33:2834-2838
14. Kuntz KM, Skillman JJ, Whittemore AD, Kent KC. Carotid endarterectomy in asymptomatic patients: is contrast angiography necessary? a morbidity analysis. J Vasc Surg 1995;22:706-714