Exploring a Financial Product model with a two-population genetic algorithm

Proceedings of the 2004 Congress on Evolutionary Computation, CEC2004

Volumn 1, Issue , 2004, Pages 855-862

  Kimbrough, Steven O ^a   Lu, Ming ^a   Safavi, Soofi M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS; FINANCIAL PRODUCT (FP) MODELS; GENETIC SOLVERS; MORTGAGE REFINANCING;

DECISION MAKING; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPTIMIZATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; SET THEORY;

COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY;

EID: 4344701893     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. B. Branley, R. Fradin, S. O. Kimbrough, and T. Shafer. On heuristic mapping of decision surfaces for post-evaluation analysis. In R. H. Sprague, Jr., editor, Proceedings of the Thirtieth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Los Alamitos, CA, 1997. IEEE Press.
2. T. F. Cooper, D. E. Rozen, and R. E. Lenski. Parallel changes in gene expression after 20,000 generations of evolution in e. coli. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100:1072-1077, 2003.
3. S. O. Kimbrough, M. Lu, and D. H. Wood. Exploring the evolutionary details of a two-population genetic algorithm in the context of constrained optimization. Working paper, University of Pennsylvania, Department of Operations and Information Management, Philadelphia, PA, January 2004.
4. S. O. Kimbrough, M. Lu, D. H. Wood, and D. J. Wu. Exploring a two-market genetic algorithm. In W. B. Langdon, E. Cantú-Paz, and et al., editors, Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO 2002), pages 415-21, San Francisco, CA, 2002. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
5. S. O. Kimbrough, M. Lu, D. H. Wood, and D. J. Wu. Exploring a two-population genetic algorithm. In E. Cantú-Paz and et al., editors, Genetic and Evolutionary Computation - GECCO 2003, LNCS 2723, pages 1148-1159, Berlin, Germany, 2003. Springer.
6. S. O. Kimbrough and J. R. Oliver. On automating candle lighting analysis: Insight from search with genetic algorithms and approximate models. In J. F. Nunamaker, Jr. and R. H. Sprague, Jr., editors, Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Volume III: Information Systems: Decision Support and Knowledge-Based Systems, pages 536-544, Los Alamitos, CA, 1994. IEEE Computer Society Press.
7. S. O. Kimbrough, J. R. Oliver, and C. W. Pritchett. On post-evaluation analysis: Candle-lighting and surrogate models. Interfaces, 23(7): 17-28, May-June 1993.
8. R. E. Lenski, J. A. Mongold, P. D. Sniegowski, M. Travisano, F. V. F, P. J. Gerrish, and T. M. Schmidt. Evolution of competitive fitness in experimental populations of e. coli: what makes one genotype a better competitor than another? Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 73(1):35-47, 1998. A review.
9. Z. Michalewicz. Genetic Algorithms + Data Structures = Evolution Programs. Springer, Berlin, Germany, third edition, 1996.
10. F. Taddei, M. Radman, J. Maynard-Smith, B. Toupance, P. H. Gouyon, and B. Goodelle. Role of mutator alleles in adaptive evolution. Nature, 387(6634):700-703, 1997. Cited by Paul Sniegowski.
11. C. O. Wilke, J. Wang, C. Ofria, R. E. Lenski, and C. Adami. Evolution of digital organisms at high mutation rate leads to survival of the flattest. Nature, 412:331-333, 2003.