The UK foot-and-mouth disease outbreak - The aftermath

Nature Reviews Microbiology

Volumn 2, Issue 8, 2004, Pages 675-681

  Haydon, Daniel T ^a   Kao, Rowland R ^b   Kitching, R Paul ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c CANADIAN FOOD INSPECTION AGENCY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE VACCINE;

ACTIVE IMMUNIZATION; ARTICLE; CONTROL STRATEGY; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; EPIDEMIC; EUROPE; FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE; FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE VIRUS; GENETIC VARIABILITY; INFECTION CONTROL; INFECTION RISK; LIVESTOCK; NONHUMAN; POLICY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; UNITED KINGDOM; VACCINATION; VETERINARY MEDICINE; VIRUS TRANSMISSION; ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; MANAGEMENT;

ANIMALIA; FOOT-AND-MOUTH DISEASE VIRUS;

ANIMALS; DISEASE OUTBREAKS; FOOT-AND-MOUTH DISEASE; GREAT BRITAIN; POLICY MAKING;

EID: 4344701248     PISSN: 17401526     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nrmicro960     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Correa Melo, E., Saraiva, V. & Astudillo, V. Review of the status of foot and mouth disease in countries of South America and approaches to control and eradication. Rev. Sci. Tech. 21, 429-436 (2002).
2. Thomson, G. R. et al. Shifting paradigms in international animal health standards: the need for comprehensive standards to enable commodity based trade. [online] (http://www.eldis.org/fulltext/shiftingparadigms.pdf) (2004).
3. Woods, A. To vaccinate or vacillate? The British response to foot and mouth disease, 1920-2001. Hist. Res. (in the press).
4. Northumberland. Report of the Committee of Inquiry on Foot-and-Mouth Disease. (Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London, 1969).
5. The Royal Society. Inquiry into Infectious Diseases in Livestock. (The Stationery Office, London, 2002) [online], (http://www.royalsoc.ac.uk/inquiry/index.html) (2002).
6. Anderson, I. Foot and Mouth Disease 2001: Lessons to be Learned Inquiry [online], (http://www.defra.gov.uk/corporate/inquiries/lessons/index.htm) (2001).
7. DEFRA. Foot and Mouth Disease - contingency plan. [online] (http://www.defra.gov.uk/footandmouth/contingency/index.htm) (2004).
8. Tinline, R. Lee wave hypothesis for the initial pattern of spread during the 1967-68 foot and mouth epizootic. Nature 227, 860-862 (1970).
9. Haydon, D. T., Woolhouse, M, E. J. & Kitching, R. P. An analysis of foot-and-mouth-disease epidemics in the UK. IMA J. Math. Appl. Med. Biol. 14, 1-9 (1997).
10. Gibbens, J. C. et al. Descriptive epidemiology of the 2001 foot-and-mouth disease epidemic in Great Britain: the first five months. Vet. Rec. 149, 729-743 (2001).
11. Haydon, D. T et al. The construction and analysis of epidemic trees with reference to the 2001 UK foot-and-mouth outbreak. Proc. R Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 270, 121-127 (2003).
12. Mansley, L. M., Dunlop, P. J., Whiteside, S. M. & Smith, R. G. Early dissemination of foot-and-mouth disease virus through sheep marketing in February 2001. Vet. Rec. 153, 43-50 (2003).
13. Keeling, M. J. et al. Dynamics of the 2001 UK foot and mouth epidemic: stochastic dispersal in a heterogeneous landscape. Science 294, 813-817 (2001).
14. Gibbens, J. C. & Wilesmith, J. W. Temporal and geographical distribution of cases of foot-and-mouth disease during the early weeks of the 2001 epidemic in Great Britain. Vet. Rec. 151, 407-412 (2002).
15. Donaldson, A. I., Alexandersen, S., Sorensen, J. H. & Mikkelsen, T. Relative risks of the uncontrollable (airborne) spread of FMD by different species. Vet. Rec. 148, 602-604 (2001).
16. Fraser, C., Riley, S., Anderson, R. M. & Ferguson, N. M. Factors that make an infectious disease outbreak controllable. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 6146-6151 (2004).
17. Alexandersen, S. & Donaldson, A. I. Further studies to quantify the dose of natural aerosols of foot-and-mouth disease virus for pigs. Epidemiol. Infect. 128, 313-323 (2002).
18. Matthews, L. et al. Neighbourhood control policies and the spread of infectious diseases. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 270, 1659-1666 (2003).
19. Morris, R. S., Wilesmith, J. W., Stern, M. W., Sanson, R. L. & Stevenson, M. A. Predictive spatial modelling of alternative control strategies for the foot-and-mouth disease epidemic in Great Britain, 2001. Vet. Rec. 149, 137-144 (2001).
20. Ferguson, N. M., Donnelly, C. A. & Anderson, R. M. Transmission intensity and impact of control policies on the foot and mouth epidemic in Great Britain. Nature 413, 542-548 (2001).
21. Ferguson, N. M., Donnelly, C. A. & Anderson, R. M. The foot-and-mouth epidemic in Great Britain: pattern of spread and impact of interventions. Science 292, 1155-1160 (2001).
22. Phillips, N., Bridgeman, J. & Ferguson-Smith, M. Report of the Inquiry into BSE and Variant CJD in the United Kingdom. (Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London, 1999).
23. Kao, R. R. The role of mathematical modelling in the control of the 2001 FMD epidemic in the UK. Trends Microbiol. 10, 279-286 (2002).
24. Woolhouse, M. E. Foot-and-mouth disease in the UK: what should we do next time? J. Appl. Microbiol. 94, S126-S130 (2003).
25. Alexandersen, S., Kitching, R. P., Mansley, L. M. & Donaldson, A. I. Clinical and laboratory investigations of five outbreaks of foot-and-mouth disease during the 2001 epidemic in the United Kingdom. Vet. Rec. 152, 489-496 (2003).
26. Kao, R. R. The impact of local heterogeneity on alternative control strategies for foot-and-mouth disease. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 270, 2557-2564 (2003).
27. Gloster, J. et al. Airborne transmission of foot-and-mouth disease virus from Burnside Farm, Heddon-on-the-Wall, Northumberland, during the 2001 epidemic in the United Kingdom. Vet. Rec. 152, 525-533 (2003).
28. Mikkelsen, T. et al. Investigation of airborne foot-and-mouth disease virus transmission during low-wind conditions in the early phase of the UK 2001 epidemic. Atmos. Chem. Phys. Disc. 3, 677-703 (2003).
29. Wingfield, A. S., Middlemiss, C. H. & Eppink, L. FMD control strategies. Vet. Rec. 152, 479-480 (2003).
30. Taylor, N. M., Honhold, N., Paterson, A. D. & Mansley, L. M. Risk of foot-and-mouth disease associated with proximity in space and time to infected premises and the implications for control policy during the 2001 epidemic in Cumbria. Vet. Rec. 154, 617-626 (2004).
31. National Audit Office. Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General: The 2001 Outbreak of Foot and Mouth Disease. (The Stationery Office, London, 2002) [online], (http://www.nao.org.uk/publications/nao_reports/01-02/0102939part1.pdf) ,(http://www.nao.org.uk/publications/nao_reports/01-02/0102939part2.pdf) (2002).
32. Thompson, D. et al. Economic costs of the foot and mouth disease outbreak in the United Kingdom in 2001. Rev. Sci. Tech. 21, 675-687 (2002).
33. Royal Society (Edinburgh). Inquiry Into Foot and Mouth Disease in Scotland. (Royal Society of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, 2002).
34. Sutmoller, P. & Olascoaga, R. C. in Evidence for the Temporary Committee on Foot-and-Mouth Disease of European Parliament. Meeting 2nd Sept. (European Parliament 2002).
35. Bouma, A. et al. The foot-and-mouth disease epidemic in The Netherlands in 2001. Prev. Vet. Med. 57, 155-166 (2003).
36. Barnett, P. V. & Carabin, H. A review of emergency foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) vaccines. Vaccine 20, 1505-1514 (2002).
37. Donaldson, A. I. & Kitching, R. P. Transmission of foot-and-mouth disease by vaccinated cattle following natural challenge. Res. Vet. Sci. 46, 9-14 (1989).
38. Barnett, P. V. et al. Evidence that high potency foot-and-mouth disease vaccine inhibits local virus replication and prevents the 'carrier' state in sheep. Vaccine 22, 1221-1232 (2004).
39. Mackay, D. K., Forsyth, M. A., Davies, P. R. & Salt, J. S. Antibody to the nonstructural proteins of foot-and-mouth disease virus in vaccinated animals exposed to infection. Vet. Q. 20, S9-11 (1998).
40. The Council of the European Union. Council Directive 2003/85/EC. Official J. European Union L 306, 1-41 (2003).
41. Eddy, R. Vets asked valuable questions about foot-and-mouth measures. Nature 412, 477 (2001).
42. Haydon, D. T., Samuel, A. R. & Knowles, N. J. The generation and persistence of genetic variation in foot-and-mouth disease virus. Prev. Vet. Med. 51, 111-124 (2001).
43. Donaldson, A. I., Gloster, J., Harvey, L. D. & Deans, D. H. Use of prediction models to forecast and analyse airborne spread during the foot-and-mouth disease outbreaks in Brittany, Jersey and the Isle of Wight in 1981. Vet. Rec. 110, 53-57 (1982).
44. Donaldson, A. Foot-and-mouth disease: the principal features. Ir. Vet. J. 41, 325-327 (1987).
45. Alexandersen, S., Zhang, Z., Donaldson, A. I. & Garland, A. J. The pathogenesis and diagnosis of foot-and-mouth disease, J. Comp. Pathol. 129, 1-36 (2003).
46. Woolhouse, M. E. J., Haydon, D. T., Pearson, A. & Kitching, R. P. Failure of vaccination to prevent outbreaks of foot-and-mouth disease. Epidemiol. Infect. 116, 363-371 (1996).
47. Hughes, G. J. et al. Serial passage of foot-and-mouth disease virus in sheep reveals declining levels of viraemia over time. J. Gen. Virol. 83, 1907-1914 (2002).
48. Bouma, A., Dekker, A. & de Jong, M. C. No foot-and-mouth disease virus transmission between individually housed calves. Vet. Microbiol. 98, 29-36 (2004).
49. Woolhouse, M. E. J. et al. Foot-and-mouth disease under control in the UK. Nature 411, 258-259 (2001).
50. Kao, R. R. Landscape fragmentation and foot-and-mouth disease transmission. Vet. Rec. 148, 746-747 (2001).