Scalpel or mouse? A statistical comparison of real & virtual frog dissections

American Biology Teacher

Volumn 66, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 408-411

  Cross, Tina R ^a   Cross, Victor E ^b  

^a Carver High School   (United States)

^b Central High School   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANURA;

EID: 4344701087     PISSN: 00027685     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1662/0002-7685(2004)066[0409:somasc]2.0.co;2     Document Type: Review

References (7)

1. Kinzie, M. (1993a). The effects of interactive dissection simulations on the performance and achievement of high school biology students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(8), 989-1000.
2. Kinzie, M. (1993b). Use of dissection-related courseware by low-ability high school students: A qualitative inquiry. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 41(3), 87-101.
3. Lewis, O. (2001). Disgusted With Dissection. Available online at: http://radford.edu/~archive/season04/vent/stories/peta.htm.
4. McNeely, D. (2000). Dissection simulation. Available online at: http://bioww.clemson.edu/biolab/dissect.html.
5. Orlans, F.B. (1988). Should students harm or destroy animal life? The American Biology Teacher, 50,6-12.
6. Russo, R. (1997). Virtual labs. Journal of Computers in Math and Science Teaching, 16(4), 577-582.
7. Velle, S. & Hal, T. (1999). Virtual Frog Dissection-Reality Check? Available online at: http://www.ofsd.k12.wi.us/science/study/htm.