Guidelines for the scientific and professional development of forensic neuropsychology;Pautas para el desarrollo científico y profesional de la neuropsicología forense

Revista de Neurologia

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 60-73

  Verdejo, A ^a   Alcázar Córcoles, Miguel Ángel ^b,c   Gomez Jarabo G A ^c   Perez Garcia M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

^b Ministerio de Justicia   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Clinical psychology; Forensic neuropsychology; Forensic population; Forensic psychology; Malingering

Indexed keywords

CONSENSUS; CULTURAL FACTOR; FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; LEGAL ASPECT; MALINGERING; METHODOLOGY; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; REVIEW; SPAIN; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 4344700108     PISSN: 02100010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.33588/rn.3901.2004229     Document Type: Review

References (90)

1. Garzón A. Psicología y justicia. Valencia: Promolibro; 1990.
2. Hom J. Forensic neuropsychology: are we there yet? Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2003; 18: 827-45.
3. Larrabee G. Forensic neuropsychological assessment. In Vanderploeg RD, ed. Clinician's guide to neuropsychological assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2000. p. 301-35.
4. Denney R, Wynkoop T. Clinical neuropsychology in the criminal forensic setting. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2000; 15: 804-28.
5. Franzen M, Burgess E, Smith-Seemiller L. Methods of estimating premorbid functioning. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 1997; 12: 711-38.
6. Chaitor N, Schmitter-Edgecombe M. The ecological validity of neuropsychological tests: a review of the literature on everyday cognitive skills. Neuropsychol Rev 2003; 13: 181-97.
7. Slick DJ, Tan JE, Strauss EH, Hultsch DF. Detecting malingering: a survey of experts' practices. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2004; 19: 465-73.
8. Faust D. Forensic neuropsychology: the art of practicing a science that does not yet exist. Neuropsychol Rev 1991; 2: 205-31.
9. Lezak MD. Neuropsychological assessment. 3 ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 1995.
10. Matarazzo J D, Prifitera A. Subtest scatter and premorbid intelligence: lessons from the WAIS-R standardization sample. Psychol Assess 1989; 1: 186-91.
11. Mortensen EL, Gade A, Reinisch JM. A critical note on Lezak's 'best performance method' in clinical neuropsychology. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1991; 13: 361-71.
12. Wechsler D. Wechsler adult intelligence scale. 3 ed. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation; 1997.
13. Wechsler D. The measurement and appraisal of adult intelligence. 4 ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1958.
14. McFie J. Assessment of organic intellectual impairment. New York: Oxford University Press; 1975.
15. Fuld P. Behavioral signs of cholinergic deficiency in Alzheimer's disease. In Corkin S, Davis K, Growdon J, Usdin E, Wurtman R, eds. Alzheimer's disease: a report of progress in research. New York: Free Press; 1982. p. 201-10.
16. Fuld P. The profile of cholinergic dysfunction and of Alzheimer-type dementia. J Clin Neuropsychol 1984; 6: 380-92.
17. Willshire D, Kinsella G, Prior M. Estimating WAIS-R IQ from the national adult reading test: a cross-validation. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1991; 13: 204-16.
18. Del Ser T, González-Montalvo JI, Martínez-Espinosa S, Delgado-Villapalos C, Bermejo F. Estimation of premorbid intelligence in Spanish people with the word accentuation test and its application to the diagnosis of dementia. Brain Cogn 1997; 33: 343-56.
19. Schinka JA, Vanderploeg RD. Estimating premorbid level of functioning. In Vanderploeg RD, ed. Clinician's guide to neuropsychological assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2000. p. 301-35.
20. Barona A, Reynolds CR, Chastain R. A demographically based index of premorbid intelligence for the WAIS-R. J Consult Clin Psychol 1984; 52: 885-7.
21. Karzmark P, Heaton RK, Grant I, Mathews CG. Use of demographic variables to predict full scale IQ: A replication and extension. J Clin Neuropsychol 1985; 7: 412-20.
22. Wilson RS, Rosenbaum G, Brown G, Rourke D, Whitman D. An index of premorbid intelligence. J Consult Clin Psychol 1978; 12: 745-56.
23. Bilbao-Bilbao A, Seisdedos N. Eficacia de una fórmula de estimación de la inteligencia premórbida en población española. Rev Neurol 2004; 38: 431-4.
24. Wilson RS, Rosenbaum G, Brown G. The problem of premorbid intelligence in neuropsychological assessment. J Clin Neuropsychol 1979; 1: 49-53.
25. Vanderploeg RD, Schinka JA. Predicting WAIS-R IQ premorbid ability: combining subtest performance and demographic variable predictors. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 1995; 10: 225-39.
26. Crawford JR, Stewart LE, Parker DM, Besson JAO, Cochrane RHB. Estimation of premorbid intelligence: combining psychometric and demographic approaches improves predictive accuracy. Pers Individ Dif 1989; 10: 793-96.
27. Vanderploeg RD, Schinka JA, Axelrod BN. Estimation of WAIS-R premorbid intelligence: Current ability and demographic data used in a best-performance fashion. Psychol Assess 1996; 80: 404-11.
28. Krull KR, Scott JG, Scherer M. Estimation of premorbid intelligence from combined performance and demographic variables. Clin Neuropsychol 1995; 9: 83-8.
29. Crawford JR, Moore JW, Cameron IM. Verbal fluency: a NART-based equation for the estimation of premorbid performance. Br J Clin Psychol 1992; 31: 327-9.
30. Williams JM. The prediction of premorbid memory ability. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 1997; 12: 745-56.
31. Grace J, Stout JC, Malloy PF. Assessing frontal behavioral syndromes with the frontal lobe personality scale. Assessment 1999; 6: 269-84.
32. Labarge AS, McCaffrey RJ, Brown TA. Neuropsychologists' abilities to determine the predictive value of diagnostic tests. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2003; 18: 165-75.
33. Kaufman AS. Assessing adolescent and adult intelligence. Needham, MA: Allyn & Bacon; 1990.
34. Lees-Haley PR, Brown RS. Neuropsychological complaint base rates of 170 personal injury claimants. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 1993; 8: 203-9.
35. Palmer BW, Boone KB, Lesser IM, Wohl MA. Base rates of 'impaired' neuropsychological test performance among healthy older adults. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 1998; 13: 503-11.
36. Zakzanis KK. Statistics to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth: formulae, illustrative numerical examples, and heuristic interpretation of effect size analyses for neuropsychological researchers. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2001; 16: 653-67.
37. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual for mental disorders. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994.
38. Slick DJ, Sherman EMS, Iverson GL. Diagnostic criteria for malingered neurocognitive dysfunction: Proposed standards for clinical practice and research. Clin Neuropsychol 1999; 13: 545-61.
39. Iverson GL, Binder LM. Detecting exaggeration and malingering in neuropsychological assessment. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2000; 15: 829-58.
40. Binder LM. Assessment of malingering after mild head trauma with the Portland digit recognition test. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1993; 15: 170-82.
41. Rose FE, Hall S, Szalda-Petree AD. Portland digit recognition test-computerized: measuring response latency improves the detection of malingering. Clin Neuropsychol 1995; 9: 124-34.
42. Slick DJ, Hoop G, Strauss E. The Victoria symptom validity test. Odessa, FL; Psychological Assessment Resources; 1995.
43. Tombaugh TN. Test of memory malingering. New York: Multi Health Systems; 1996.
44. Schagen S, Schmand B, De Sterke S, Lindeboom L. Amsterdam short-term memory test: a new procedure for the detection of feigned memory deficit. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1997; 19: 43-51.
45. Boone KB, Lu P, Sherman D, Palmer B, Back C, Shamieh E, et al. Validation of a new technique to detect malingering of cognitive symptoms: The b test. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2000; 11: 227-41.
46. Friedrik RI. Validity indicator profile manual. Minnentonka, ST: NCS Assessments; 1997.
47. Bianchini KJ, Mathias CW, Greve KW. Symptom validity testing: a critical review. Clin Neuropsychol 2001; 15: 19-45.
48. Greve KW, Bianchini KJ. Setting empirical cut-offs on psychometric indicators of negative response bias: a methodological commentary with recommendations. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2004; 19: 533-41.
49. Millis SR, Kler S. Limitations of the Rey fifteen-item test in the detection of malingering. Clin Neuropsychol 1995; 9: 241-4.
50. Boone KB, Lu P, Back C, King C, Lee A, Philpott L. Sensitivity and specificity of the Rey dot counting test in patients with suspected effort and various clinical samples. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2002; 17: 625-42.
51. Meyers JE, Volbrecht ME. A validation of multiple malingering detection methods in a large clinical sample. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2003; 18: 261-76.
52. Bender SD, Rogers R. Detection of neurocognitive feigning: development of a multi-strategy assessment. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2004; 19: 49-60.
53. Greiffenstein MF, Baker WJ, Gola T. Validation of malingered amnesia measures with a large clinical sample. Psychol Assess 1994; 6: 218-24.
54. Mittenberg W, Azrin R, Millsaps C, Heilbronner R. Identification of malingered head injury on the Wechsler memory scale-revised. Psychol Assess 1993; 5: 34-40.
55. Heaton RK, Smith HH, Lehman AW, Vogt AT. Prospects for faking believable deficits on neuropsychological testing. J Consult Clin Psychol 1978, 46: 892-900.
56. Reitan RM, Wolfson D. Detection of malingering and invalid test results using the Halstead-Reitan neuropsychological battery. In Reynolds CR, ed. Detection of malingering during head injury litigation. New York: Plenum Press; 1998. p. 163-208.
57. Millis SR, Putnam SH, Adams KH, Ricker JH. The California verbal learning test in the detection of incomplete effort in neuropsychological testing. Psychol Assess 1995; 7: 463-71.
58. Bernard LC, McGrath MJ, Houston W. The differential effects of simulated malingering, closed head injury, and other CNS pathology on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test: support for the 'pattern of performance' hypothesis. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 1996; 11: 231-45.
59. Tenhula WN, Sweet JJ. Double cross-validation of the booklet category test in detecting malingered traumatic brain injury. Clin Neuropsychol 1996; 10: 104-16.
60. Lees-Haley PR, English LT, Glenn WJ. A fake bad scale on the MMPI-2 for personal injury claimants. Clin Neuropsychol 1991; 68: 203-10.
61. Lees-Haley PR. Efficacy of MMPI-2 validity scales and MCMI II modifier scales for detecting spurious PTSD claims: F, F-K, fake bad scale, ego strength, subtle-obvious subscales, dis. and deb. J Clin Psychol 1992; 48: 681-9.
62. Lewis JL, Simcox AM, Berry DTR. Screening for feigned psychiatric symptoms in a forensic sample by using the MMPI-2 and the structured inventory of malingered symptomatology. Psychol Assess 2002; 14: 170-6.
63. Slick DJ, Hopp G, Strauss E, Spellacy F. Victoria symptom validity test: Efficiency for detecting feigned memory impairment and relationship to neuropsychological tests and MMPI-2 validity scales. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1996; 18: 911-22.
64. Smith GP, Burger GK. Detection of malingering: validation of the structured inventory of malingered symptomatology (SIMS). J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 1997; 25: 183-9.
65. Rogers R, Hinds JD, Sewell KW. Feigning psychopathology among adolescents offenders: Validation of the SIRS, MMPI-A, and SIMS. J Pers Assess 1996; 67: 244-57.
66. Wilson BA, Cockburn J, Baddeley A. The Rivermead behavioural memory test. Bury St. Edmunds, UK: Thames Valley Test Company; 1985.
67. Robertson IH, Ward T, Ridgeway V, Nimmo-Smith I. The structure of normal human attention: the test of everyday attention. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 1996; 2: 525-34.
68. Funke J, Krüger T. 'Plan a day': conception of a modifiable instrument for the selection of managers and first results. In Funke J, Fritz A, eds. Neue Konzepte und Instrumente zur Planungsdiagnostik. Bonn: Deutcher Psychologen Verlag 1995. p. 97-120.
69. Wilson BA, Alderman N, Burgess PW, Emslie H, Evans JJ. behavioral assessment of the dysexecutive syndrome. Bury St. Edmunds, UK: Thames Valley Test Company; 1996.
70. Franzen MD, Wilhelm KL. Conceptual foundations of ecological validity in neuropsychology. In Sbordone RJ, Long CJ, eds. Ecological validity of neuropsychological testing. Delray Beach, FL: GR Press/St. Lucie Press; 1996. p. 91-112.
71. Farias ST, Harrell E, Neumann C, Houtz A. The relationship between neuropsychological performance and daily functioning in individuals with Alzheimer's disease: ecological validity of neuropsychological tests. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2003; 18: 655-72.
72. Kibby MY, Schmitter-Edgecombe M, Long CJ. Ecological validity of neuropsychological tests: focus on the California verbal learning test and the Wisconsin card sorting test. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 1998; 13: 523-34.
73. Lowenstein DA, Rubert MP, Argüelles T, Duara R. Neuropsychological test performance and prediction of functional capacities among Spanish-speaking and English-speaking patients with dementia. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 1995; 10: 75-88.
74. Lally SL. What tests are acceptable for use in forensic evaluations? A survey of experts. Prof Psychol Res Pr 2000; 34: 491-8.
75. Fitzhugh KB, Fitzhugh LC, Reitan RM. Psychological deficits in relation to acuteness of brain dysfunction. J Consult Psychol 1961; 25: 61-6.
76. Reitan RM, Wolfson D. Mild head injury: Intellectual, cognitive and emotional consequences. Tucson, AZ: Neuropsychology Press; 2000.
77. Finkelstein JN. Brain: a computer program for interpretation of the Hastead-Reitan neuropsychological test battery. Diss Abstr Int 1977; 37: 5349.
78. Goldstein AM, Weiner IB. Handbook of psychology. Forensic psychology. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 2003.
79. Pérez-García M, García J, Caracuel A, Antequera M, Orozco C, et al. Propuesta del perfil profesional del neuropsicólogo clínico [en preparación].
80. Gudjonsson GH, Haward LRC. Forensic psychology. London: Routledge; 2000.
81. Mehl PE. Clinical versus statistical predictions. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 1954.
82. Sawyer J. Measurement and prediction, clinical and statistical. Psychol Bull 1966; 66: 178-200.
83. Gudjonsson GH. The psychology of interrogation, confessions and testimony. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 1992.
84. Muñoz-Céspedes JM, Paúl-Lapedriza N. La detección de los posibles casos de simulación después de un traumatismo craneoencefálico. URL: http//www.uninet.edu/union99/ congress. Fecha última consulta: 08.02.2004.
85. Esbec E, Gómez-Jarabo G. Psicología forense y tratamiento jurídico-legal de la discapacidad. Madrid: Edisofer; 2000.
86. Marson D, Sawrie S, Stalvey B, McInturff B, Harrell L. Neuropsychological correlates of declining financial capacity in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Comunicación presentada en Annual Meeting of the International Neurpsychological Society, Honolulu, HI; 1998.
87. Gómez-Jarabo G, Esbec E, Olavarrieta S. Evaluación psicológica de las discapacidades [en proceso].
88. Losada N, Alcázar-Córcoles MA, Gómez-Jarabo G. La defensa letrada y la mediación como respuesta a la conducta del menor infractor. Anuario de Psicología Jurídica 2002; 12: 115-28.
89. Flory K, Lynam DR. The relation between attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and substance abuse: What role does conduct disorder play? Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev 2003; 6: 1-14.
90. Gómez-Hermoso R. Actuación e intervención del psicólogo en el juzgado de vigilancia penitenciaria. Anuario de Psicología Jurídica 1998; 8: 141-62.