Phonology constrains the internal orthographic representation

Reading and Writing

Volumn 14, Issue 3-4, 2001, Pages 297-332

  Katz, Leonard ^a,b   Frost, Stephen J ^a,b  

^a HASKINS LABORATORIES   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

Orthography; Reading; Spelling; Word recognition

Indexed keywords

EID: 4344699960     PISSN: 09224777     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1011165407770     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Bosman, A.M.T. & Van Orden, G.C. (1997). Why spelling is more difficult than reading. In: C.A. Perfetti (ed.), Learning to spell (pp. 173-194). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Bradley, L. & Bryant, P.E. (1979). The independence of reading and spelling in backward and normal readers, Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 21: 504-514.
3. Brown, A.S. (1988). Encountering misspellings and spelling performance: Why wrong isn't right, Journal of Educational Psychology 80: 488-494.
4. Brack, M. (1993). Component spelling skills of college students with childhood diagnosis of dyslexia, Learning Disabilities Quarterly: 171-184.
5. Caramazza, A., Berndt, R. & Basili, A. (1983). The selective impairment of phonological processing: A case study, Brain and Language 18: 128-174.
6. Ehri, E.G. (1986). Sources of difficulty in learning how to spell and read. In: M.L. Wolraich & D. Routh (eds.), Advances in developmental and behavioral pediatrics (pp. 121-195). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
7. Ehri, E. (1997). Learning to read and learning to spell are one and the same, almost. In: C.A. Perfetti (ed.), Learning to spell (pp. 237-269). Hillsdale, NY: Erlbaum.
8. Frost, R., Katz, E. & Bentin, S. (1987). Strategies for visual word recongition and orthographical depth: A multilingual comparison, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 13: 104-115.
9. Frost, R. (1998). Towards a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: True issues and false trails, Psychological Bulletin 123: 71-99.
10. Gough, P.B., Juel, C. & Giffith, P.E. (1992). Reading, spelling, and the orthographic cipher. In: P.B. Gough, L.C. Ehri & R. Treiman (eds.), Reading Acquisition (pp. 35-48). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Hanley, J.R. & McDonnell, V. (1997). Are reading and spelling phonologically mediated? Evidence from a patient with a speech production impairment, Cognitive Neuropsychology 14: 3-33.
12. Jacoby, L.L. & Hollingshead, Ann. (1990). Reading student essays may be hazardous to your spelling: Effects of reading incorrectly and correctly spelled words, Canadian Journal of Psychology 44: 345-358.
13. Kaminska, Z. & Dixon, M. (1994). A phonological gateway to orthographic representations. Meeting of the European Society for Cognitive Psychology, Lisbon.
14. Katz, E. & Feldman, L.B. (1983). Relation between pronunciation and recognition of printed words in deep and shallow orthographies, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 9: 157-166.
15. Katz, E. & Feldman, L.F. (1996). The influence of an alphabetic writing system on the reading and writing process. In: H. Guenther & O. Ludwig (eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit [Writing and Its Use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research] (pp. 1094-1101). Berlin: Walterde Gruyter.
16. Katz, L. & Frost, R. (1992). Reading is different in different orthographies: The orthographic depth hypothesis. In: R. Frost & L. Katz (eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 67-84). Amsterdam: Elsevier North Holland.
17. Kreiner, D.S. (1992). Reaction time measures of spelling: Testing a two-strategy model of skilled spelling, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 18: 765-776.
18. Kreiner, D.S. & Gough, P.B. (1990). Two ideas about spelling: Rules and word-specific memory, Journal of Memory and Language 29: 103-118.
19. Kucera, H. & Francis, W. (1967). Computational analysis of present day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
20. Lukatela, G., Turvey, M.T., Feldman, L.B., Carello, C. & Katz, L. (1989). Alphabetic priming in bi-alphabetical word perception, Journal of Memroy and Language 28: 237-254.
21. Lukatela, G. & Turvey, M.T. (1994a). Visual access is initially phonological: 1. Evidence from associative priming by words, homophones, and pseudohomophones, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 123: 107-128.
22. Lukatela, G. & Turvey, M.T. (1994b). Visual access is initially phonological: 2. Evidence from phonological priming by homophones and pseudohomophones, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 123: 331-353.
23. Mattingly, L.G. (1992). Linguistic awareness and orthographic form. In: R. Frost & L. Katz (eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 11-26). Amsterdam: Elsevier North Holland.
24. Miceli, G., Benvegnu, B., Capasso, R. & Caramazza, A. (1997). The independence of phonological and orthographic lexical forms: Evidence from aphasia, Cognitive Neuropsychology 14: 35-69.
25. Oney, B., Peter, M. & Katz, L. (1997). Phonological processing in printed word recognition: Effects of Age and Writing System, Scientific Studies of Reading 1: 65-83.
26. Perfetti, C.A., Zhang, S. & Berent, I. (1992). Reading in English and Chinese: Evidence for a 'universal' phonological principle. In: R. Forst & L. Katz (eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaing (pp. 227-248). Amsterdam: Elsevier North Holland.
27. Pugh, K., Rexer, K. & Katz, L. (1994). Evidence for flexible coding in visual word recognition, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 20: 807-825.
28. Pugh, K.R., Shaywitz, B.A., Shaywitz, S.A., Shankweiler, D.P., Katz, E., Fletcher, J.M., Skudlarshi, P., Fulbright, R.K., Constable, R.T., Bronen, R.A., Lacadie, C. & Gore, J.C. (1997). Predicting reading performance from neuroimaging profiles: The cerebral basis of phonological effects in printed word identification, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 23: 1-20.
29. Pugh, K.R., Shaywitz, B.A., Shaywitz, S.A., Shankweiler, D.P., Katz, L., Fletcher, J.M., Skudlarski, P., Fulbright, R.K., Constable, R.T., Bronen, R.A., Lacadie, C. & Gore, J.C. (2000). The angular gyrus in developmental dyslexia: Task-specific differences in functional connectivity in posterior cortex, Psychological Science 11: 51-56.
30. Rapp, B., Folk, J., Botelet, E. & Skultety, K. (1998). Structure and texture in graphemic representations. Psychonomic Society meeting, Dallas, Texas.
31. Rastle, K. & Coltheart, M. (1998). Whammies and double whammies: The effect of length on nonword reading, Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 5: 277-282.
32. Shankweiler, D., Lundquist, E., Dreyer, L. & Dickinson, C. (1996). Reading and spelling difficulties in high school students: Causes and consequences, Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 8: 267-294.
33. Sternberg, S. (1969). Memory scanning: Mental processes revealed by reaction-time experiments, American Scientist 57: 421-457.
34. Stone, G.O. & Van Orden, G.C. (1994). Building a resonance framework for word recognition using design and system principles, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 20: 1248-1268.
35. Treiman, R. (1992). The role of intrasyllabic units in learning how to read and spell. In: P.B. Gough, L.C. Ehri & R. Treiman (eds.), Reading Acquisition (pp. 107-144). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. Treiman, R. (1993). Beginning to spell. New York: Oxford University Press.