A consideration of individual differences and imagery ability amongst cognitive interviewees

Psycoloquy

Volumn 7, Issue , 1996, Pages

  Memon, Amina ^a   Stevenage, Sarah V ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cognitive interview; Errors; Eyewitness memory; Facilitated recall; Police procedures; Questioning; Recovered memories; Structured interview

Indexed keywords

EID: 4344699698     PISSN: 10550143     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. Carter, C.A., Bottoms, B.L. & Levine, M. (1996). Linguistic and socioemotional influences on the accuracy of children's reports. Law and Human Behaviour, 20(3), 335-358.
2. Ceci, S.J., Loftus, E.F., Leichtman, M. & Bruck, M. (1994). Possible role of source misattribution in the creation of false beliefs among preschoolers. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 42, 304-320.
3. Dobson, M. & Markham, R. (1993). Imagery ability and source monitoring: Implications for eyewitness memory. British Journal of Psychology, 32, 111-118.
4. Douglas, R.N. (1996). Considering the Witness in Interviews. PSYCOLOQUY 7(21) witness-memory.7.douglas.
5. Greene, E., Flynn, M.S. & Loftus, E.F. (1982). Inducing resistance to misleading information. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 21, 207-219.
6. Gudjonsson, G.H. (1987). A parallel form of the Gudjonsson suggestibility scale. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 26, 215-218.
7. Gudjonsson, G.H. (1992). The psychology of interrogations, confessions and testimony. Chichester: Wiley.
8. Gudjonsson, G.H., & Clare, I.C.H. (in press). The relationship between confabulation and intellectual ability, interrogative suggestibility and acquiescence. Personality and Individual Differences.
9. Hyman, I.E. & Billings, J.F. (1995). Individual differences in the creation of false memories. Manuscript under revision for Memory.
10. Katz, A. (1983). What does it mean to be a high imager. In J. C. Yuille (Ed.), Imagery, memory and cognition: Essays in honor of Allan Paivio. Hillsdale New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11. Kaufmann, G. (1983). How good are imagery questionnaires? A rejoinder to David Marks. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 24, 247-249.
12. Koehnken, G., Milne, R., Memon, A. & Bull, R. (1994, March). A meta-analysis of the effects of the cognitive interview. Paper presented at the Biennial Conference of the American Psychology and Law Society, Sante Fe.
13. Kosslyn, S.M., Brunn, J., Dave, K.R. & Wallach, R.W. (1984). Individual differences in mental imagery ability: A computational analysis. Cognition, 18, 195-243.
14. Leichtman, M. & Ceci, S. (1995). The effects of stereotypes and suggestions on preschoolers; reports. Developmental Psychology, 31(4), 568-578.
15. Marks, D. (1973). Visual imagery differences in the recall of pictures. British Journal of Psychology, 64, 17-24.
16. Marschark, M. (1988). The functional role of imagery in cognition? In M. Denis, J. Eugelkamp & J. Richardson (Eds.). Cognitive and neuropsychological approaches to mental imagery. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
17. Memon, A., Cronin, O., Eaves, R. & Bull, R. (1993). The cognitive interview and child witnesses. In G.M. Stephenson & N.K. Clark (Eds.), Children, evidence and procedure. Issues in criminological and legal psychology, no. 20, British Psychological Society, Leicester, UK.
18. Memon, A., Cronin, O., Eaves, R. & Bull, R. (1996). An empirical test of the mnemonic components of the cognitive interview. In G.M. Davies, S. Lloyd-Bostock, M. McMurran & C. Wilson, (Eds.), Psychology and law: Advances in research. Berlin: De Gruyter.
19. Memon, A. & Stevenage, S.V. (1996b). Interviewing Witnesses: What Works and What Doesn't? PSYCOLOQUY 7(6) witness-memory.1.memon.
20. Memon, A., Wark, L., Bull, R. & Koehnken, G. (in press, a). Isolating the effects of the cognitive interview techniques. British Journal of Psychology.
21. Memon, A., Wark, L., Holley, A., Bull, R. & Koehnken, G. (in press, b). Reducing suggestibility in child witness interviews. Applied Cognitive Psychology.
22. Milne, R. (1996). An analysis and application of the cognitive interview. University of Portsmouth, UK. (in preparation).
23. Ornstein, P.A. & Naus, M.J. (1978). Rehearsal processes in children's memory. In P.A. Ornstein (Ed.), Memory development in children. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24. Price, D.W. & Goodman, G.S. (1990). Visiting the wizard: children's memory for a recurring event. Child Development, 61, 664-690.
25. Saywitz, K. & Snyder, L. (1993). Improving children's testimony with preparation. In G. Goodman & B. Bottoms (Eds.), Child victims, child witnesses: Understanding and improving testimony. New York: The Guilford Press.
26. Schooler, J. & Loftus, E.F. (1986). Individual differences and experimentation: Complementary approaches to interrogative suggestibility. Social Behaviour, 1, 105-112.
27. Schwartz-Kenny, B., Bottoms, B.L. & Goodman, G. (1996). Improving children's person identification. Child Maltreatment, 1(2), 121-133.
28. Wark, L., Memon, A., Koehnken, G. & Bull, R. (1995). Uses and abuses of schematic knowledge. RWPS/95/1
29. Weinert, F.E. & Perlmutter, M. (Eds.). (1988). Memory development: Universal challenges and individual differences. Hillsdale New Jersey; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
30. Wellman, H.M. (1983). Metamemory revisited. In M.T.H. Chi (Ed.), Trends in memory development research (Vol 9). Basel: S. Karger.
31. White, K., Sheehan, P.W. & Ashton, R. (1977). Imagery assessment: A survey of self-report measures. Journal of Mental Imagery, 1, 145-170.