Ethics of refusing parental requests to withhold or withdraw treatment from their premature baby

Journal of Medical Ethics

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 402-405

  Boyle, Rob ^a   Salter, R ^a   Arnander, M W ^b  

^a HILLINGDON HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b ST THOMAS HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; CHILD; CHILDBIRTH; CLINICAL PRACTICE; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; HUMAN RIGHTS; LEGAL ASPECT; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEMBRANE RUPTURE; PARENTAL CONSENT; PATIENT COUNSELING; PHYSICAL DISABILITY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREGNANCY TERMINATION; PREMATURITY; RESUSCITATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; SECOND TRIMESTER PREGNANCY; SURVIVAL RATE; TREATMENT WITHDRAWAL; UNITED KINGDOM;

DEATH AND EUTHANASIA; LEGAL APPROACH;

ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFANT, PREMATURE; PARENTS; PERSONHOOD; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREGNANCY TRIMESTER, SECOND; RESUSCITATION; TREATMENT REFUSAL;

EID: 4344699231     PISSN: 03066800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jme.2002.000745     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Abortion Act 1967 (c87). Norwich, UK: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
2. World Health Organisation. Unsafe abortion: global and regional estimates of incidence of and mortality due to unsafe abortion with a listing of available country data. Geneva: World Health Organisation, 1997.
3. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. The care of women requesting induced abortion. London: RCOG Press, 2000. http://www.rcog.org.uk/guidelines/induced_abortion.html (accessed 1 June 2002).
4. The Children Act 1989 (c41). Norwich, UK: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
5. McHaffie HE, Fowlie PW. Life, death and decisions: doctors and nurses reflect on neonatal practice. Cheshire: Hochland and Hochland, 1996:190-204.
6. Wood NS, Marlow N, Costeloe K, et al. Neurologic and developmental disability after extremely preterm birth. EPICure study group. N Engl J Med 2000;343:378-84.
7. Yu VY. Developmental outcome of extremely preterm infants. Am J Perinatol 2000;17:57-61.
8. Sutton L, Bajuk B. Population based study of infants born at less than 28 weeks' gestation in New South Wales, Australia in 1992-3. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 1999;13:288-301.
9. Bengtson JM, VanMarter LJ, Barss VA, et al. Pregnancy outcome after premature rupture of the membranes at or before 26 weeks' gestation. Obstet Gynecol 1989;73:921-7.
10. Dowd J, Permezel M. Pregnancy outcome following preterm premature rupture of the membranes at less than 26 weeks' gestation. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1992;32:120-4.
11. Rib DM, Sherer DM, Woods JR Jr. Maternal and neonatal outcome associated with prolonged premature rupture of membranes below 26 weeks' gestation. Am J Perinatol 1993;10:369-73.
12. Farooqi A, Holmgren PA, Engberg S, et al. Survival and 2-yeor outcome with expectant management of second-trimester rupture of membranes. Obstet Gynecol 1998;92:895-901.
13. Major CA, Kitzmiller JL. Perinatal survival with expectant management of midtrimester rupture of membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;163:838-44.
14. Human Rights Act 1998. Norwich, UK: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
15. [1981]1 WLR 1421,CA.
16. [1997]1 WLR 242.
17. Goss JA, Shackleton CR, McDiarmid SV, et al. Long term results of pediatric liver transplantation. Ann Surg 1998;228:411-20.
18. Pierce v Soc of Sisters (1925) 268US510, 535.
19. Meyer v Nebraska (1923) 262US390, 399.
20. Parham v JR (1979) 442US584, 602.
21. Quilloin v Woolcott (1978) 434US246, 255.
22. Jehovah's Witnesses of Wash v King Co Hosp (1967) 390US598.
23. Bowen v American Hospital Association (1986) 476US610.
24. State v Messenger 561NW2d463 (Mich Ct App 1997).
25. Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health. Witholding or withdrawing life saving treatment in children. London: Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, 1997.
26. British Association for Perinatal Medicine. Fetuses and newborn infants at the threshold of viability: a framework for practice, July 2000.
27. Canadian Paediatric Society; Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. Management of the woman with threatened birth of an infant of extremely low gestational age. CMAJ 1994;151:547-51.
28. Allen MC, Donohue PK, Dusman AE. The limit of viability-neonatal outcome of infants born at 22 to 25 weeks gestation. N Engl J Med 1993;329:1597-601.
29. Pinkerton JV, Finnerty JJ, Lombardo PA, et al. Parental rights at the birth of a near-viable infant: conflicting perspectives. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;177:283-8.
30. McHaffie HE, Laing IA, Parker M, et al. Deciding for imperilled newborns: medical authority or parental autonomy? J Med Ethics 2001;27:104-9.
31. Van der Heide A, Van der Maas PJ, Van der Wal G, et al. The role of parents in end-of-life decisions in neonatology: physicians' views and practices. Pediatrics 1998;101:413-18.
32. Cuttini M, Rebagliato M, Bortoli P, et al. Parental visiting, communication, and participation in ethical decisions: a comparison of neonatal unit policies in Europe. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1999;81:F84-91.
33. de Leeuw R, Cuttini M, Nadai M, et al. Treatment choices for extremely preterm infants: An international perspective. J Pediatr 2000;137:608-15.
34. Gillon R. Is there a 'new ethics of abortion'? J Med Ethics 2001;27(Suppl 2):ii5-9.
35. Robertson JA. Ethics and policy in embryonic stem cell research. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 1999;9:109-36.
36. McCullough LB, Chervenak FA. Ethics in obstetrics and gynecology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994:224-8.
37. Campbell AV. Viability and the moral status of the fetus. Ciba Found Symp 1985;115:228-43.
38. Gross ML. Avoiding anomalous newborns: preemptive abortion, treatment thresholds and the case of baby Messenger. J Med Ethics 2000;26:242-8.
39. Glover J. Causing death and saving lives. London: Penguin, 1990:92-112.
40. Rachels J. Active and passive euthanasia. N Engl J Med 1975;292:78-80.
41. Strong C. The moral status of pre-embryos, embryos, fetuses and infants. J Med Philos 1997;22:457-78.
42. Glover J. Causing death and saving lives. London: Penguin, 1990:126-8.
43. Tooley M. Abortion and infanticide. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983.
44. Jongmans M, Mercuri E, de Vries L, et al. Minor neurological signs and perceptual-motor difficulties in prematurely born children. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1997;76:F9-14.
45. Wolke D. Psychological development of prematurely born children. Arch Dis Child 1998;78:567-70.
46. Marlow N, Lynne R, Cooke RWI. Outcome at 8 years for children with birth weight of 1250 g or less. Arch Dis Child 1993;68:286-90.
47. Hobbs GF, Hobbs CJ, Wynne JM. Abuse of children in foster and residential care. Child Abuse Negl 1999;23:1239-52.
48. Zupancic JA, Richardson DK, Lee K, et al. Economics of prematurity in the era of managed care. Clin Perinatol 2000;27:483-97.
49. Danish Council of Ethics. Debate outline: extreme prematurity, ethical aspects. Copenhagen: Eurolingua, 1995:28.
50. Cooper TR, Berseth CL, Adams JM, et al. Actuarial survival in the premature infant less than 30 weeks' gestation. Pediatrics 1998;101:975-8.
51. Draper ES, Manktelow B, Field DJ, et al. Prediction of survival for preterm births by weight and gestational age: retrospective population based study. BMJ 1999;319:1093-7.
52. Lorenz JM. The outcome of extreme prematurity. Semin Perinatol 2001;25:348-59.