Reproducibility of response to nasal lysine-aspirin challenge in patients with aspirin-induced asthma

Annals of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology

Volumn 93, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 185-188

  Lee, Daniel K C ^a   Haggart, Kay ^a   Lipworth, Brian J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACETYLSALICYLIC ACID; LYSINE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASPIRIN INDUCED ASTHMA; ASTHMA; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COEFFICIENT OF VARIATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG INDUCED DISEASE; DRUG RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INHALATION; INTRANASAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION; MALE; MINIMUM CROSS SECTIONAL AREA; NOSE AIRFLOW; PEAK NASAL INSPIRATORY FLOW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROVOCATION TEST; REPRODUCIBILITY; RHINOMETRY; STATISTICAL PARAMETERS;

EID: 4344688755     PISSN: 10811206     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)61473-1     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Szczeklik A, Stevenson DD. Aspirin-induced asthma: advances in pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003;111:913-921.
2. Milewski M, Mastalerz L, Nizankowska E, Szczeklik A. Nasal provocation test with lysine-aspirin for diagnosis of aspirin-sensitive asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1998;101:581-586.
3. Casadevall J, Ventura PJ, Mullol J, Picado C. Intranasal challenge with aspirin in the diagnosis of aspirin intolerant asthma: evaluation of nasal response by acoustic rhinometry. Thorax. 2000;55:921-924.
4. Plavec D, Somogyi-Zalud E, Godnic-Cvar J. Modified method of nonspecific nasal provocation with histamine for routine use. Ann Allergy. 1994;72:321-328.
5. Wilson AM, Sims EJ, Robb F, Cockburn W, Lipworth BJ. Peak inspiratory flow rate is more sensitive than acoustic rhinometry or rhinomanometry in detecting corticosteroid response with nasal histamine challenge. Rhinology. 2003;41:16-20.
6. Sims EJ, Wilson AM, White PS, Gardiner Q, Lipworth BJ. Short-term repeatability and correlates of laboratory measures of nasal function in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. Rhinology. 2002;40:66-68.
7. Fairley JW, Durham LH, Ell SR. Correlation of subjective sensation of nasal patency with nasal inspiratory peak flow rate. Clin Otolaryngol. 1993;18:19-22.
8. Wilson A, Dempsey OJ, Sims EJ, Coutie WJ, Paterson MC, Lipworth BJ. Evaluation of treatment response in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis using domiciliary nasal peak inspiratory flow. Clin Exp Allergy. 2000;30:833-838.
9. Ganslmayer M, Spertini F, Rahm F, Terrien MH, Mosimann B, Leimgruber A. Evaluation of acoustic rhinometry in a nasal provocation test with allergen. Allergy. 1999;54:974-979.
10. Fisher EW. Acoustic rhinometry. Clin Otolaryngol. 1997;22:307-317.
11. Dastidar P, Numminen J, Heinonen T, et al. Nasal airway volumetric measurement using segmented HRCT images and acoustic rhinometry. Am J Rhinol. 1999;13:97-103.
12. Corey JP, Gungor A, Nelson R, Fredberg J, Lai V. A comparison of the nasal cross-sectional areas and volumes obtained with acoustic rhinometry and magnetic resonance imaging. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997;117:349-354.
13. Hamilton JW, McRae RD, Jones AS. The magnitude of random errors in acoustic rhinometry and re-interpretation of the acoustic profile. Clin Otolaryngol. 1997;22:408-413.