Effects of remote and in-person verbal interactions on verbalization rates and attention to dynamic spatial scenes

Accident Analysis and Prevention

Volumn 36, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 1029-1043

  Gugerty, Leo ^a   Rakauskas, Mick ^b   Brooks, Johnell ^a  

^a CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cell phone; Driving; Passenger; Situation awareness

Indexed keywords

AUTOMOBILE DRIVERS; CELLULAR TELEPHONE SYSTEMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HAZARDS; PASSENGER CARS; SIGNAL DETECTION;

DRIVING; SITUATION AWARENESS; VERBAL TASKS;

ACCIDENT PREVENTION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CAR DRIVING; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MOBILE PHONE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REACTION TIME; TRAFFIC ACCIDENT; UNITED STATES; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

ACCIDENTS, TRAFFIC; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; AUTOMOBILE DRIVING; CELLULAR PHONE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; REACTION TIME; SOUTH CAROLINA; SPACE PERCEPTION; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 4344667186     PISSN: 00014575     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2003.12.002     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Alibali M., Heath D., Myers H. Effects of visibility between speaker and listener on gesture production: some gestures are meant to be seen. J. Memory Language. 44:2001;169-188.
2. Alm H., Nilsson L. The effects of a mobile telephone task on driver behaviour in a car following situation. Accid. Anal. Prevent. 27(5):1995;707-715.
3. Chapanis A., Ochsman R.B., Parrish R.N., Weeks G.D. Studies in interactive communication: the effects of four communication modes on the behavior of teams during cooperative problem-solving. Hum. Factors. 14(6):1972;487-509.
4. Cohen, J., 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
5. Endsley M.R. Towards a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum. Factors. 37(1):1995;32-64.
6. Gugerty L. Situation awareness during driving: explicit and implicit knowledge in dynamic spatial memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 3(1):1997;42-66.
7. Haigney D., Westerman S.J. Mobile (cellular) phone use and driving: a critical review of research methodology. Ergonomics. 44(2):2001;132-143.
8. Heathcote A., Brown S., Mewhort D. Quantile maximum likelihood estimation of response time distributions. Psychonomic Bull. Rev. 9(2):2002;394-401.
9. Heath C., Luff P. Media space and communicative asymmetries: preliminary observations of video-mediated interaction. Hum. Computer Interact. 7:1992;315-346.
10. Laberge-Nadeau C., Maag U., Bellavance F., Lapierre S., Desjardins D., Messier S., Saïdi A. Wireless telephones and the risk of road crashes. Accid. Anal. Prevent. 35:2003;649-660.
11. Laudeman I.V., Palmer E.A. Quantitative measurement of observed workload in the analysis of aircrew performance. Int. J. Aviation Psychol. 5(2):1995;187-197.
12. McKnight A.J., McKnight A.S. The effect of cellular phone use upon driver attention. Accid. Anal. Prev. 25(3):1993;259-265.
13. Parkes, A.M., 1991. Drivers business decision making whilst using carphones. In: Lovessey, E. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Ergonomics Society Annual Conference: Contemporary Ergonomics. Taylor & Francis, London, pp. 427-432.
14. Raby M., Wickens C.D. Strategic workload management and decision biases in aviation. Int. J. Aviation Psychol. 4(3):1994;211-240.
15. Segal, L. D., 1994. Actions speak louder than words: How pilots use nonverbal information for crew communications. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 38th Annual Meeting. Human Factors Society, Santa Monica, CA.
16. Siegman A., Reynolds M. Effects of mutual invisibility and topical intimacy on verbal fluency in dyadic communication. J. Psycholinguistic Res. 12(5):1983;4443-4455.
17. Speilberger, C., Gorsuch, R., Lushene, R., 1970. Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA.
18. Strayer D.L., Drews F., Johnston W. Cell phone-induced failures of visual attention during simulated driving. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 9(1):2003;23-32.
19. Strayer D.L., Johnston W.A. Driven to distraction: dual-task studies of simulated driving and conversing on a cellular telephone. Psychol. Sci. 12(6):2001;462-466.
20. Verwy W.B., Veltman H.A. Detecting short periods of elevated workload: a comparison of nine workload assessment techniques. J. Exp. Psychol. 2(3):1996;270-285.
21. Watson D., Clark L.A., Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affectance: the PANAS scale. J. Personality Social Psychol. 54:1988;1063-1070.
22. Waugh, J.D., Glumm, M.M., Kilduff, P.W., Tauson, R.A., Smyth, C.C., Pillalamarri, R.S., 2000. Cognitive workload while driving and talking on a cellular phone or to a passenger. In: Proceedings of the IEA 2000/HFES 2000 Congress.
23. Wickens, C.D., 1980. The structure of attentional resources. In: Nickerson, R.S. (Ed.), Attention and Performance VIII. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 239-257.