Peer review, politics and pluralism

Environmental Science and Policy

Volumn 7, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 357-368

  Harrison, Chris ^a  

^a University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Environmental policy; Lomborg; Peer review; Pluralism; Science policy

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; EDITORIAL; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; LITERATURE; PEER REVIEW; POLITICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; REVIEW;

EID: 4344662893     PISSN: 14629011     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2004.06.005     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Abate, T., 2004. What's the verdict on peer review? 21st Century: Ethics in Social Research. Columbia University, http://www.columbia.edu/cu/21stC/issue-1.1/peer.htm
2. Abbott A. Ethics panel attacks environment book Nature 421 2003 201
3. Arrow, K., 1995. Foreword. In: Shepherd, G.B. (Ed.), Rejected: Leading Economists Ponder the Publication Process. Thomas Horton - Daughters, Arizona
4. Bate, J., 2001. Song of the Earth. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
5. BBC News, 2003. Row over passive smoking effect: A study suggesting the damaging effect of passive smoking on health may have been overstated has sparked a furious row. Row over passive smoking effect: a study suggesting the damaging effect of passive smoking on health may have been overstated has sparked a furious row. BBC News, UK Edition, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/3026933.stm
6. Bell, R., 2002. The uninformed environmentalist: How did the skeptical environmentalist pull the wool over the eyes of so many editors? Worldwatch Magazine, March-April
7. Bellesiles, M.A. 2002. A.A. Knopf Arming America: The Origins of a National Gun Culture New York
8. Browne, A., 2001. Recovering Earth. The Observer, 10th June
9. Burgan, M., 2002. Academic freedom in a world of moral crises. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 6 September
10. Cambridge University Press, 2004a. The Skeptical Environmentalist: Media - Reviews. http://uk.cambridge.org/economics/lomborg/reviews_j.htm
11. Cambridge University Press, 2004b. The Skeptical Environmentalist: The Debate. http://uk.cambridge.org/economics/lomborg/websites_j.htm
12. Campanario, J.M., unpublished working paper. Rejecting nobel class articles and resisting nobel class discoveries. Rejecting nobel class paper, http://www2.uah.es/jmc/nobel.html
13. Cooper, R., 2002. Review of the skeptical environmentalist: measuring the real state of the world. Foreign Affairs, May-June
14. Dalton R. Berkeley accused of biotech bias as ecologist is denied tenure Nature 426 2003 591
15. Danish Committee on Scientific Dishonesty, 2004. (UVVU), Decision regarding complaints against Bjorn Lomborg? Full text in English available, http://www.forsk.dk/uvvu/nyt/udtaldebat/bl_decision.htm
16. Esty, D.C., 2001. Toward data-driven environmentalism: The environmental sustainability index. Environ. Law Rep., xxxi (5), 10603-10612
17. Esty, D.C., 2002. Why measurement matters. In: Esty, D.C., Cornelius, P. (Eds.), Environmental Performance Measurement: The Global Report 2001-2002. Oxford University Press, New York
18. Consortium European for Political Research, 2002. Book Reviews, The Politics of the Environment: Ideas, Activism, Policy by Neil Carter. Green Polit. Newslett. 1 (2), http://www.essex.ac.uk/ecpr/standinggroups/green/vol1issue2/ book_reviews.htm
19. Frank L. Charges don't stick to The Skeptical Environmentalist Science 303 2004 28
20. Freeman III J.M. Environmental policy since Earth day I: What have we achieved? J. Econ. Perspect. Winter 2002 125-146
21. Frey B.S. Publishing as prostitution?: Choosing between one's own ideas and academic success Public Choice 1161 2003 205-223
22. Giles J. Wanna Bet? Nature 420 2002 354-355
23. Gross, R.A., 2002. Historians and guns. The William and Mary Quarterly, January, http://www.historycooperative.org/journals/wm/59.1/ guns_intro.html
24. Guardian, 2001. Crisis. What crisis. Guardian, 15-17 August
25. Guterman, L., 2002. Scientists accuse toxicology journal of industry ties. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 6 December
26. HNN Staff, 2004. How the Bellesiles Story Developed. Hist. News Network, http://hnn.us/articles/691.html#latest
27. Kaplinsky N. Braun D. Lisch D. Hay A. Hake S. Freeling M. Maize trangene results in Mexico are artefacts Nature 416 2002 601-602
28. Katiz, D., 2002. Who reviews the peer review? Mackinac Center for Public Policy, http://www.mackinac.org/print.asp?ID=4568
29. Kennedy, D., 2002. To publish or not to publish. Science 295 (8th March)
30. Krugman, P., 2003. Delusions of Power. New York Times, 28th March
31. Lepowski, W., 2002. Biotech's OK Corral. Sci. Policy Perspect, http://www.cspo.org/s-pp/060902.html
32. Levine, J., 2002. Harmful to Minors: The Perils of Protecting Children from Sex. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis
33. Lindgren, J., 2002. Fall from grace, arming America and the Bellesiles scandal. Yale Law J. 111, 2195-2249, http://www.law.northwestern.edu/ faculty/fulltime/Lindgren/Lindgren.html
34. Lomborg, B. 2001. The Skeptical Environmentalist. Measuring the Real State of the World. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
35. Lynas, M., 2004. High Tide: News from a Warming World. Flamingo
36. Natural Environment Research Council, 2004. Spiked-science debates: The environment spiked science, http://www.spiked-online.com/sections/ science/debates/kyoto/
37. Nature Publishing Group, 2002. Editorial note. Nature 416, 601-602
38. Nature Publishing Group, 2003. Coping with peer rejection. Nature 425, 645
39. Nature Publishing Group, 2004. News in brief: panel ordered to revisit verdict on Lomborg book. Nature 427, 6-7
40. New Scientist, 2002. Web Links: Environ. Ecol. 11-20, NewScientist.com, http://www.newscientist.com/weblinks/categories/environment2.jsp
41. Norgaard R.B. Optimists, pessimists and science BioScience 523 2002 287-292
42. Oreskes, N., 2004. Science and public policy: What's proof got to do with it? Environ. Sci. Policy 7, 369-383
43. Quist D. Chapela I.H. Transgenic DNA introgressed into traditional maize landraces in Oaxaca, Mexico Nature 414 2001 541-543
44. Radio National, 2002. Transcript of the science show on Australian radio national. In: Williams R., Lomborg, B., Raven, P. (Eds.), 2 March, The Science Show, http://www.abc.net.au/rn/science/ss/stories/ s495345.htm
45. Ridley, M., 2002. The profits of doom. The Spectator, 23 February
46. Schoenbrod, D., 2002. The mau-mauing of Bjorn Lomborg. Commentary 114 (2), http://www.commentarymagazine.com/Summaries/V114I2P53-1.htm
47. Shepherd, G.B., 1995. Rejected: Leading Economists Ponder the Publication Process. Thomas Horton - Daughters, Sun Lakes, Arizona
48. Star Tribune, 2002. University of Minnesota Press book on children's sexuality causes furor; conservatives assail author, publisher. Associated Press, http://www.startribune.com/stories/389/2202788.html
49. Sunstein, C., 2001. Republic.com. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJA
50. Sunstein, C., 2002. Risk and Reason: Safety, Law, and the Environment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
51. Svozil, K., unpublished paper. Censorship and the peer review system. http://tph.tuwien.ac.at/~svozil/publ/2002-pr.pd.
52. The Economist Print Edition, 2001. The truth about the environment. The Economist, 2 August
53. Union of Concerned Scientists, 2003. UCS examines The Skeptical Environmentalist by Bjørn Lomborg. Global Environment, http://www.ucsusa.org/global_environment/archive/page.cfm?pageID=533
54. University of Minnesota Press, 2002. In: Levine, J. (Ed.), Harmful to Minors: The Perils of Protecting Children from Sex. http://www.upress.umn.edu/Books/L/levine_harmful.html
55. Wade, N., 2001. Scientist at Work/Bjorn Lomborg; From an Unlikely Quarter, Eco-Optimism. New York Times, 7 August
56. World Resources Institute, 2002. MEDIA KIT: debunking pseudo-scholarship: Things a journalist should know about The Skeptical Environmentalist. WRI Report, http://www.wri.org/press/mk_lomborg.html