Experiences of the BMJ ethics committee

BMJ

Volumn 329, Issue 7464, 2004, Pages 510-

  Wager, Elizabeth ^a  

^a NONE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFIDENTIALITY; HUMAN; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NURSE; PATIENT CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHORT SURVEY;

BIOETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS; BMJ (BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL);

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CONFIDENTIALITY; DISCLOSURE; EDITORIAL POLICIES; ETHICS COMMITTEES; GUIDELINES; JOURNALISM, MEDICAL; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT;

EID: 4344648720     PISSN: 09598138     EISSN: 14685833     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.329.7464.510     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. McCall Smith A, Tonks A, Smith R. An ethics committee for the BMJ. BMJ 2000; 321: 720.
2. Minerva. BMJ 1996; 313: 240.
3. Meux CJ, Stegen G. Getting a mummy's consent. BMJ 1996; 313: 1265.
4. Draft guidelines on consent to the publication of patient information. http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/322/7297/1263/DC1/5 (accessed 8 July 2004).
5. Stroble J, Cave E, Walley T. Data protection legislation: interpretation and barriers to research. BMJ 2000; 321: 890–892.
6. Al-Shahi R, Warlow C. Using patient identifiable data for observational research and audit. BMJ 2000; 321: 1031–1032.
7. Venters G. Lack of ethical approval is a disgrace. BMJ 2001; 322: 7281 http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/eletters/322/7281/276#12825 (Accessed 14 Oct 2003.)