From 'nanny state' to 'therapeutic state'

British Journal of General Practice

Volumn 54, Issue 505, 2004, Pages 645-

  Fitzpatrick, Mike ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BINGE EATING DISORDER; CHILD ABUSE; DOMESTIC VIOLENCE; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEALTH PROMOTION; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; LIFESTYLE; MEDICAL PROFESSION; NOTE; OBESITY; PATHOLOGICAL GAMBLING; PATIENT COUNSELING; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; QUALITY OF LIFE; SMOKING HABIT; TRAFFIC ACCIDENT; WELLBEING;

DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; GOVERNMENT; HUMANS; SOCIAL CONTROL POLICIES;

EID: 4344641353     PISSN: 09601643     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Note

References (3)

1. Coote A. Nanny madness. What's so terrible about the nanny state, anyway? Guardian 2004; 26 May. http://society.guardian.co.uk/societyguardian/ story/0,7843,1224215,00.html (accessed 12 Jul 2004).
2. King's Fund. Public attitudes to public health policy. London: King's Fund, 2004. http://www.kingsfund.org.uk/pdf/publicattitudesreport.pdf (accessed 12 Jul 2004).
3. Furedi F. Therapy culture: cultivating vulnerability in an uncertain age. London: Routledge, 2004.