|
Volumn 94, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 379-380
|
Quo vadis? Ureteric reimplantation or ignoring reflux during augmentation cystoplasty
|
Author keywords
Augmentation cystoplasty; Bladder; Exstrophy epispadias; Infravesical obstruction; Neurogenic; Vesico ureteric reflux
|
Indexed keywords
ADOLESCENT;
ANTIREFLUX OPERATION;
ARTICLE;
BLADDER CAPACITY;
BLADDER EXSTROPHY;
BLADDER PRESSURE;
BLADDER RECONSTRUCTION;
CHILD;
CLINICAL ARTICLE;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
CYSTOURETHROGRAPHY;
EPISPADIAS;
FEMALE;
HUMAN;
INTERMITTENT CATHETERIZATION;
KIDNEY FUNCTION;
MALE;
NEUROGENIC BLADDER;
PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;
TREATMENT INDICATION;
URETER REIMPLANTATION;
VESICOURETERAL REFLUX;
CHILD;
CYSTECTOMY;
FEMALE;
FOLLOW-UP STUDIES;
HUMANS;
MALE;
REPLANTATION;
RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
URETER;
URINARY BLADDER, NEUROGENIC;
VESICO-URETERAL REFLUX;
|
EID: 4344630938
PISSN: 14644096
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.04965.x Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (33)
|
References (6)
|