Response strategies in aphasic sentence comprehension: An analysis of two cases

Aphasiology

Volumn 18, Issue 8, 2004, Pages 675-692

  Mitchum, Charlotte C ^a   Haendiges, Anne N ^a   Berndt, Rita Sloan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; APHASIA; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; COMPREHENSION; CONCEPT FORMATION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; MALE; SEMANTICS; SPEECH ANALYSIS; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 4344623287     PISSN: 02687038     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02687030444000255     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Berndt, R. S., Haendiges, A. N., & Wozniak, M. A. (1997). Verb retrieval and sentence processing: Dissociation of an established symptom association. Cortex, 33, 99-114.
2. Berndt, R. S., & Mitchum, C. C. (1997). Lexical-semantic organization: Evidence from aphasia. Clinical Neuroscience, 4, 57-63.
3. Berndt, R. S., & Mitchum, C. C. (1998). An experimental treatment for sentence comprehension. In N. Helm-Estabrooks & A. L. Holland (Eds.), Approaches to the treatment of aphasia (pp. 91-111). San Diego, CA: Singular Press.
4. Berndt, R. S., Mitchum, C. C., Burton, M. W., & Haendiges, A. N. (2004). Comprehension of reversible sentences in aphasia: The effects of verb meaning. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 21, 229-244.
5. Bever, T. G. (1970). The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In J. R. Hayes (Ed.), Cognition and language development (pp. 279-362). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
6. Black, M., Nickels, L., & Byng, S. (1991). Patterns of sentence processing deficit. Processing simple sentences can be a complex matter. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 6, 79-101.
7. Caplan, D. (1992). Language: Structure, processing and disorders. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
8. Caplan, D., & Futter, C. (1986). Assignment of thematic roles to nouns in sentence comprehension by an aphasic patient. Brain and Language, 27, 117-134.
9. Caramazza, A., & Zurif, E. B. (1976). Dissociation of algorithmic and heuristic processes in language comprehension: Evidence from aphasia. Brain and Language, 3, 572-582.
10. Carlson, G., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1988). Thematic roles and language comprehension. In W. Wilkens (Ed.), Thematic relations: Syntax and semantics (Vol. 21). New York: Academic Press.
11. Chatterjee, A., Maher, L. M., Gonzalez-Rothi, L. J., & Heilman, K. M. (1995). Asyntactic thematic role assignment: The use of a temporal-spatial strategy. Brain and Language, 49, 125-129.
12. Chatterjee, A., Southwood, M. H., & Basilico, D. (1999). Verbs, events and spatial representations. Neuropsychologia, 37, 395-402.
13. Cohen, J. D., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M. R., & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: A new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 25, 257-271.
14. Ferreira, F., Bailey, K. G. D., & Ferraro, V. (2002). Good-enough representations in language comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 11-15.
15. Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
16. Haendiges, A. N., Berndt R. S., & Mitchum, C. C. (1996). Assessing the elements contributing to a mapping deficit: A targeted treatment study. Brain and Language, 52, 276-302.
17. Inglis, A. L. (2003). Taking expectations to task in aphasic sentence comprehension: Investigations of off-line performance. Aphasiology, 17(3), 265-289.
18. Kay, J., Lesser, R., & Coltheart, M. (1992). The Psycholinguistic Assessment of Language in Aphasia (PALPA). Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
19. Linebarger, M. C. (1995). Agrammatism as evidence about grammar. Brain and Language, 49, 52-91.
20. Linebarger, M. C. (1998). Algorithmic and heuristic processes in agrammatic language comprehension. In E. Visch-Brink & R. Bastiaanse (Eds.), Linguistic levels in aphasiology. London: Singular Publishing Ltd.
21. Linebarger, M. C., Schwartz, M. F., & Saffran, E. M. (1983). Sensitivity to grammatial structure in so-called agrammatic aphasics. Cognition, 13, 361-392.
22. Mitchum, C. M., & Berndt, R. S. (1995). Treatment of thematic mapping in sentence comprehension: Implications for normal processing. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 12, 503-547.
23. Mitchum, C. M., Greenwald, M. L., & Berndt, R. S. (2000). Cognitive treatments of sentence processing disorders: What have we learned? Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 10, 311-336.
24. Rochon, E., Saffran, E. M., Berndt, R. S., & Schwartz, M. F. (2000). Quantitative analysis of aphasic sentence production: Further development and new data. Brain and Language, 72, 193-218.
25. Saffran, E. M., & Schwartz, M. F. (1988). Agrammatic comprehension it's not: Alternatives and implications. Aphasiology, 2, 389-394.
26. Saffran, E. M., Schwartz, M. F., & Linebarger, M. C. (1998). Semantic influences on thematic role assignment: Evidence from normals and aphasics. Brain and Language, 2, 255-297.
27. Saffran, E. M., Schwartz, M. F., Linebarger, M. C., Martin, N., & Bochetto, P. (1988). The Philadelphia Comprehension Battery. Unpublished battery.
28. Schwartz, M. F., Linebarger, M. C., Saffran, E. M., & Pate, D. S. (1987). Syntactic transparency and sentence interpretation in aphasia. Language and Cognitive Processes, 2, 85-113.
29. Schwartz, M. F., Saffran, E. M., & Marin, O. S. M. (1980). The word order problem in agrammatism: Comprehension. Brain and Language, 10, 249-262.
30. Slobin, D. J. (1966). Grammatical transformations and sentence comprehension in childhood and adulthood. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5, 219-227.