Brainstorming about next-generation computer-based documentation: An AMIA clinical working group survey

International Journal of Medical Informatics

Volumn 73, Issue 9-10, 2004, Pages 665-674

  Johnson, Kevin B ^a   Ravich, William J ^b   Cowan Jr , John A ^c  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

AMIA; Computer based documentation; Electronic health record

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; PROGRAM DOCUMENTATION;

COMPUTER-BASED DOCUMENTATION; DATA COLLECTION;

MEDICAL IMAGING;

ADULT; COMPUTER PROGRAM; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HOSPITAL BILLING; HUMAN; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE; MALE; MEDICAL CARE; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; ONLINE ANALYSIS; PATIENT CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

EID: 4344614397     PISSN: 13865056     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2004.05.009     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Ebell M.H. Computers in the examination room. J. Fam. Pract. 41(3):1995;293-294
2. McDonald C.J., Tierney W.M. Computer-stored medical records. Their future role in medical practice. JAMA. 17259(23):1988;3433-3440
3. McDonald C.J., Overhage J.M., Tierney W.M., et al. The Regenstrief Medical Record System: a quarter century experience. Int. J. Med. Inf. 54(3):1999;225-253
4. Sim I., Gorman P., Greenes R.A. Clinical decision support systems for the practice of evidence-based medicine. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 8(6):2001;527-534
5. Tang P.C., LaRosa M.P., Gorden S.M. Use of computer-based records, completeness of documentation, and appropriateness of documented clinical decisions. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 6(3):1999;245-251
6. The Computer-based Patient Record: An Essential Technology for Health Care, 2nd ed., National Academy Press, Washington, 1997.
7. Litvin C.B., Ornstein S.M., Anthony W.E. Jr., Tanner D. Quality improvement using electronic medical records: a case study of a high-performing practice. Top. Health Inf. Manage. 22(2):2001;59-64
8. Branston L.K., Greening S., Newcombe R.G., et al. The implementation of guidelines and computerised forms improves the completeness of cancer pathology reporting. The CROPS project: a randomised controlled trial in pathology. Eur. J. Cancer. 38(6):2002;764-772
9. Barahona P., Azevedo F., Veloso M., Estevao N., Gallego R. Computerising a guideline for the management of diabetes. Int. J. Med. Inf. 64(2-3):2001;275-284
10. Mikulich V.J., Liu Y.C., Steinfeldt J., Schriger D.L. Implementation of clinical guidelines through an electronic medical record: physician usage, satisfaction and assessment. Int. J. Med. Inf. 63(3):2001;169-178
11. R.N. Shiffman, Y. Liaw, D.D. Navedo, K.A. Freudigman, User satisfaction and frustration with a handheld, pen-based guideline implementation system for asthma, Proc. AMIA Symp. (1999) 940-944.
12. M.M. Morgan, J. Goodson, G.O. Barnett, Long-term changes in compliance with clinical guidelines through computer-based reminders, Proc. AMIA Symp. (1998) 493-497.
13. A.S. Tonnesen, A. LeMaistre, D. Tucker, Electronic medical record implementation barriers encountered during implementation. Proc. AMIA Symp. (1999) 624-626.
14. Berkowitz L.L. Breaking down the barriers. Improving physician buy-in of CPR systems. Healthc Inform. 14(10):1997;73-76
15. McDonald C.J. The barriers to electronic medical record systems and how to overcome them. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 4(3):1997;213-221
16. Kaplan B. Reducing barriers to physician data entry for computer-based patient records. Top. Health Inf. Manage. 15(1):1994;24-34
17. Frame P.S. Health maintenance in clinical practice: strategies and barriers. Am. Fam. Physician. 45(3):1992;1192-1200
18. Kahn C.E. Jr., Wang K., Bell D.S. Structured entry of radiology reports using World Wide Web technology. Radiographics. 16(3):1996;683-691
19. D.S. Bell, R.A. Greenes, Evaluation of UltraSTAR: performance of a collaborative structured data entry system. Proc. Annu. Symp. Comput. Appl. Med. Care. (1994) 216-222.
20. Kiuchi T., Kaihara S. Automated generation of a World Wide Web-based data entry and check program for medical applications. Comput. Meth. Programs Biomed. 52(2):1997;129-138
21. Rosenthal D.F., Bos J.M., Sokolowski R.A., et al. A voice-enabled, structured medical reporting system. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 4(6):1997;436-441
22. Shiffman R.N., Brandt C.A., Freeman B.G. Transition to a computer-based record using scannable, structured encounter forms. Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 151(12):1997;1247-1253
23. Johnson K.B., Cowan J. Clictate: a computer-based documentation tool for guideline-based care. J. Med. Syst. 26(1):2002;47-60
24. Borowitz S.M. Computer-based speech recognition as an alternative to medical transcription. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 8(1):2001;101-102
25. Devine E.G., Gaehde S.A., Curtis A.C. Comparative evaluation of three continuous speech recognition software packages in the generation of medical reports. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 7(5):2000;462-468
26. Schoenbaum S.C., Barnett G.O. Automated ambulatory medical records systems. An orphan technology. Int. J. Technol. Assess Health Care. 8(4):1992;598-609
27. Anderson J.G. Computer-based ambulatory information systems: recent developments. J. Ambul. Care Manage. 23(2):2000;53-63
28. Rogers E.M. A prospective and retrospective look at the diffusion model. J. Health Commun. 9(Suppl 1):2004;13-19
29. Harris J.M. Jr. COSTAR-a working computer system for ambulatory care. Mil. Med. 143(12):1978;880-882
30. Whiting-O'Keefe Q.E., Whiting A., Henke J. The STOR clinical information system. MD Comput. 5(5):1988;8-21
31. S.G. Langer, Impact of speech recognition on radiologist productivity. J. Digit. Imaging 15 (4) (2002) 203-209.
32. K. Johnson, A. Poon, S. Shiffman, R. Lin, L. Fagan, A history-taking system that uses continuous speech recognition, Proc. Annu. Symp. Comput. Appl. Med. Care. (1992) 757-761.
33. Fiesta J. Legal issues in the information age - part 2. Nurs. Manage. 27(9):1996;12-13
34. Grams R.R., Moyer E.H. The search for the elusive electronic medical record system-medical liability, the missing factor. J. Med. Syst. 21(1):1997;1-10
35. McKenzie D.J. Defending your data: minimizing risks in a networked environment. J. Ahima. 67(8):1996;62-64. quiz 65-66.
36. Walker N.S. An integrated clinical computer system: implications for a medical information services department. J. Ahima. 65(12):1994;41-43. quiz 39-40.
37. Bates D.W., Ebell M., Gotlieb E., Zapp J., Mullins H.C. A proposal for electronic medical records in US primary care. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 10(1):2003;1-10
38. Tierney W.M. Improving clinical decisions and outcomes with information: a review. Int. J. Med. Inf. 62(1):2001;1-9
39. Wager K.A., Lee F.W., White A.W., Ward D.M., Ornstein S.M. Impact of an electronic medical record system on community-based primary care practices. J. Am. Board Fam. Pract. 13(5):2000;338-348
40. Speech recognition systems. Are they up to the task? Health Devices. 31(2) Feb (2002) 65-71.
41. Aydin C.E., Anderson J.G., Rosen P.N., Felitti V.J., Weng H.C. Computers in the consulting room: a case study of clinician and patient perspectives. Health Care Manag. Sci. 1(1):1998;61-74
42. C.S. Gadd, L.E. Penrod, Dichotomy between physicians' and patients' attitudes regarding EMR use during outpatient encounters, Proc. AMIA Symp. (2000) 275-279.
43. Zafar A., Overhage J.M., McDonald C.J. Continuous speech recognition for clinicians. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 6(3):1999;195-204
44. Johannes R.S., Carr-Locke D.L. The role of automated speech recognition in endoscopic data collection. Endoscopy. 24(Suppl 2):1992;493-498