Nonlinear V1 responses to natural scenes revealed by neural network analysis

Neural Networks

Volumn 17, Issue 5-6, 2004, Pages 663-679

  Prenger, Ryan ^a   Wu, Michael C K ^a   David, Stephen V ^b   Gallant, Jack L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b University of California at Berkeley   (United States)

Author keywords

Multi layer perceptron; Natural vision; Nonparametric model; Prediction; Receptive field; Reverse correlation; Striate cortex

Indexed keywords

NATURAL SCENES; NEURONAL RESPONSES; VISUAL PROCESSING;

ALGORITHMS; CELLS; IMAGE PROCESSING; MAPPING; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

NEURAL NETWORKS;

ALGORITHM; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; MACACA; MALE; NERVE CELL; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NONHUMAN; POSITIVE FEEDBACK; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISION; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEEDBACK; HUMANS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); NEURONS; ORIENTATION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; SPACE PERCEPTION; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 4344612285     PISSN: 08936080     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neunet.2004.03.008     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Barron A.R. Universal approximation bounds for superpositions of a sigmoidal function. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. 39:(3):1993;930-945
2. Brenner N., Bialek W., de Ruyter van Steveninck R. Adaptive rescaling maximizes information transmission. Neuron. 26:(3):2000;695-702
3. Connor C.E., Gallant J.L., Preddie D.C., Van Essen D.C. Responses in area V4 depend on the spatial relationship between stimulus and attention. Journal of Neurophysiology. 75:(3):1996;1306-1308
4. Creutzfeldt O.D., Nothdurft H.C. Representation of complex visual stimuli in the brain. Naturwissenschaften. 65:(6):1978;307-318
5. David S.V., Vinje W.E., Gallant J.L. Natural image reverse correlation in awake behaving primates. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts. 25:1999;1935
6. Deangelis G.C., Ohzawa I., Freeman R.D. Spatiotemporal organization of simple-cell receptive-fields in the cats striate cortex. 1. General- characteristics and postnatal-development. Journal of Neurophysiology. 69:(4):1993;1091-1117
7. Emerson R.C., Citron M.C., Vaughn W.J., Klein S.A. Nonlinear directionally selective subunits in complex cells of cat striate cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology. 58:(1):1987;33-65
8. Field D.J. Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 4:(12):1987;2379-2394
9. Gur M., Snodderly D.M. Visual receptive fields of neurons in primary visual cortex (V1) move in space with the eye movements of fixation. Vision Research. 37:(3):1997;257-265
10. Hornik K., Stinchcombe M., White H. Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators. Neural Networks. 2:(5):1989;359-366
11. Jones J.P., Palmer L.A. An evaluation of the two-dimensional Gabor filter model of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology. 58:(6):1987;1233-1258
12. Jones J.P., Stepnoski A., Palmer L.A. The two-dimensional spectral structure of simple receptive-fields in cat striate cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology. 58:(6):1987;1212-1232
13. Lau B., Stanley G.B., Dan Y. Computational subunits of visual cortical neurons revealed by artificial neural networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 99:(13):2002;8974-8979
14. Lehky S.R., Sejnowski T.J., Desimone R. Predicting responses of nonlinear neurons in monkey striate cortex to complex patterns. Journal of Neuroscience. 12:(9):1992;3568-3581
15. Mackay D.J.C. Probable networks and plausible predictions: a review of practical bayesian methods for supervised neural networks. Network-Computation in Neural Systems. 6:(3):1995;469-505
16. Marmarelis P.Z., Marmarelis V.Z. Analysis of physiological systems: The white noise approach. 1978;Plenum, New York
17. Moller M.F. A scaled conjugate-gradient algorithm for fast supervised learning. Neural Networks. 6:(4):1993;525-533
18. Rumelhart D.E., Hinton G.E., Williams R.J. Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature. 323:(6088):1986;533-536
19. Spitzer H., Hochstein S. A complex-cell receptive-field model. Journal of Neurophysiology. 53:(5):1985;1266-1286
20. Theunissen F.E., David S.V., Singh N.C., Hsu A., Vinje W.E., Gallant J.L. Estimating spatial temporal receptive fields of auditory and visual neurons from their responses to natural stimuli. Network: Computation in Neural Systems. 12:(3):2001;289-316
21. Tolhurst D.J., Movshon J.A., Dean A.F. The statistical reliability of signals in single neurons in cat and monkey visual-cortex. Vision Research. 23:(8):1983;775-785
22. Touryan J., Lau B., Dan Y. Isolation of relevant visual features from random stimuli for cortical complex cells. Journal of Neuroscience. 22:(24):2002;10811-10818
23. Vinje W.E., Gallant J.L. Natural stimulation of the non-Classical receptive field increases information transmission efficiency in V1. Journal of Neuroscience. 22:(7):2002;2904-2915
24. Waibel A., Hanazawa T., Hinton G., Shikano K., Lang K.J. Phoneme recognition using time-delay neural networks. Ieee Transactions on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing. 37:(3):1989;328-339